An Ed’s Diner patron asked a You Plate Special question about food-related reading.
Another patron recommended Jim Harrison’s “The Raw and the Cooked: Adventures of a Roving Gourmand.”
The book, published in 2001, collects Harrison’s food essays and columns, many of which I read in their original publications in the ’90s.
Harrison comes up again today, in a New York Times story.
Sure, the guy over-indulged with Jack Nicholson and went fork-to-fork with Orson Welles, but that’s not why Harrison’s worth reading. Here’s why Harrison’s worth reading:
Mr. Harrison, a self-described “food bully,” has very particular ideas about cooking. He thinks rosemary should be banned. He has no use for huge restaurant-style ranges: “Why should I spend $7,000 for a stove when I could spend $7,000 on food?” And he doesn’t believe that game, birds especially, should be tarted up with elaborate sauces. “As the French say, game birds taste best at the point of the gun,” he said.
… Then he declared: “Food is a great literary theme. Food in eternity, food and sex, food and lust. Food is a part of the whole of life. Food is not separate."
Read more »