Word on the Street

The latest news in and around Tacoma, Pierce County and South Puget Sound

NOTICE: Word on the Street has moved.

With the launch of our new website, we've moved Word on the Street.
Visit the new section.

Puyallup City Council discusses conduct of Planning Commissioners, council members as election season heats up

Post by Kari Plog / The News Tribune on July 17, 2013 at 11:58 am with 2 Comments »
July 17, 2013 11:58 am

In a long and heated discussion at Tuesday night’s regular meeting, the Puyallup City Council members exchanged barbs on the ethical behavior of city officials during an election season that’s in full swing.

The discussion started after Council members John Palmer and Kent Boyle requested an addition to the meeting agenda regarding controversial conduct involving two Planning Commission members and an applicant seeking to rezone land near Shaw Road.

Several residents have expressed concern that chairman Steve Hastings and vice chairman Chris McNutt attended a private meeting that included a senior representative from Schnitzer West, a developer that has an agreement with former daffodil bulb farmer Neil Van Lierop to purchase his old farmland for industrial development. (Read the full story here.)

The private gathering on June 5 raised concerns about appearance of fairness related to the state Open Public Meetings Act. In an email obtained by The News Tribune, Puyallup City Attorney Kevin Yamamoto wrote to Hastings and McNutt and advised them to recuse themselves from the rezone application process. Both commissioners did so at a public hearing last week.

Still, the commissioners’ conduct was met with more criticism at Tuesday’s council meeting. Resident Merv Swanson said the council should take a hard look at members of the commission and their involvement in the private meeting.

“I think that meeting was uncalled for and we need to have them removed from the Planning Commission,” he said.

One resident defended the commissioners’ actions. David Couch said council meetings shouldn’t be a place to air out political dirty laundry, and that the discussion was reminiscent of politically charged meetings of the past.

“We are hearing this from candidates who have sour grapes,” he said. “This is not a place for politics. This is a place to do business.”

The topic sparked a long-winded debate between council members about the ethics of all city officials.

Palmer and Boyle both said they wanted the council to address the conduct to avoid having a similar debate dropped in the council’s lap in the future.

“We have a responsibility as members of this community to do the right thing,” Boyle said. “You have enough ethics to turn around and walk out. You don’t do this kind of stuff.”

Councilman Steve Vermillion said there was no conflict with Hastings and McNutt and the controversy that has resulted is misplaced.

“Other council members that opt not to go to these things they miss out on a lot of dialogue and good deal of information,” he said.

Additionally, Vermillion accused Palmer of recruiting his supporters to attend last week’s public hearing to stir up negative public comment against Hastings and McNutt related to the private meeting. Palmer denied the accusation, and said he was unapologetic for encouraging people to speak out about such an important issue.

In an attempt to direct the council away from political bickering, Councilman Tom Swanson suggested the debate revealed a need for a procedural solution. The city needs to come up with a way for officials to know who has open applications for rezones and other city business, he said.

“How am I supposed to know to turn around and leave” if I don’t know who is conducting city business, he asked.

Kari Plog: 253-597-8682
Follow Kari on Twitter: @KariPlog

Leave a comment Comments → 2
  1. Yamamoto’s days as City Attorney may well be numbered.

    First, he moved the mayor’s wife’s criminal trial to District Court away from Puyallup’s Court so that Hansen could not pervert the course of justice. Excellent choice.

    Second, he advised McNutt and Hastings to recuse themselves from a secret meeting they had no business attending. Wise advice.

    His next action may be strike 3.

    After all, we have all seen how the gang of four, Hansen, Knutson, Hopkins and Jabba Vermillion act when their power is questioned. They fired the last City Manager for informing the media about Hansen’s sexual harassment activities at City Hall.

    Open government and sound ethics will get you fired from the payroll at Puyallup City Hall these days.

    Time to cleanse the council dais.

  2. IQ you took the words right out of my mouth!! We all have to make sure this stuff stays front and center up to and during the election. Change is definitely needed and the fact that Vermillion thinks that “there was no conflict with Hastings and McNutt” is completely LAUGHABLE and shows how out of touch he and the tea party horsemen really are!

We welcome comments. Please keep them civil, short and to the point. ALL CAPS, spam, obscene, profane, abusive and off topic comments will be deleted. Repeat offenders will be blocked. Thanks for taking part and abiding by these simple rules.

JavaScript is required to post comments.

Follow the comments on this post with RSS 2.0