Word on the Street

The latest news in and around Tacoma, Pierce County and South Puget Sound

NOTICE: Word on the Street has moved.

With the launch of our new website, we've moved Word on the Street.
Visit the new section.

Rally to oppose Camp Murray gate proposal on Monday

Post by Christian Hill / The News Tribune on July 28, 2011 at 12:21 pm with 4 Comments »
July 28, 2011 12:24 pm

The Tillicum community will hold a rally at the Lakewood City Council meeting on Monday night to oppose a revived proposal to move the main gate serving Camp Murray.

The Tillicum Woodbrook Neighborhood Association and related Tillicum Action Committee will use the gathering to demonstrate to the City Council the community opposition to the proposal due to concerns about a lot of traffic driving down a major residential street.

The meeting begins at 7 p.m. in the council chambers of Lakewood City Hall, 6000 Main St. SW.

David Anderson, the neighborhood association’s president, pledged that the group would exhaust its appeals if the project moves forward.

“We only have one approach to this: no gate move at all,” he said. “It makes no sense.”

City Manager Andrew Neiditz said the city is receptive to moving the gate to the location it initially objected to after a recent traffic analysis showed little difference in traffic impact between moving the gate there or to the city’s preferred alternative — a block south at the end of Grant Avenue.

He said moving the gate would be “non-starter” for the city without mitigation the military department will pay for to deter pass-through motorists on the residential street, Portland Avenue, which connects to the Interstate 5 interchange serving North Thorne Lane.

“The status quo, leaving the gate as it is, is just not acceptable,” he said.

The Washington State Military Department, headquartered at Camp Murray, has proposed moving the main gate from the intersection of Berkeley Street and Union Avenue to the intersection of Boundary Street and Portland Avenue. Officials there said the current gate’s proximity to a busy intersection, Interstate 5 interchange and a rail line that could see increased use is unsafe for its citizen-soldiers, employees and visitors.

Neighbors worried that the new location would be unsafe for their community. The most recent traffic analysis estimates an additional 900 vehicles a day would travel down Portland if the gate were moved either to Boundary/Portland or Grant.

In September, talks collapsed after the military department was unable to commit federal money budgeted for the project by the end of the federal fiscal year because the city of Lakewood declined to issue a right-of-way permit for the Boundary/Portland location. The city said it would issue a permit for the end of Grant Avenue — a block to the south — if the state agency complied with numerous conditions. The permit is required to connect the new gate to the public street.

The state department was able to move the federal money  into the current federal fiscal year, which ends Sept. 30.

The National Guard Bureau had been awaiting for an agreement between the city and military department to complete the environmental review process, required for the project to move forward.

Last week, the city announced a proposal enabling the military department to move the gate to the Boundary/Portland location after it agreed to provide $1.2 million in traffic improvements to the area to address the anticipated increase in traffic.

Neiditz said the city still preferred Grant after learning the traffic impacts were about the same whether the gate moved to Boundary/Portland or Grant, but the military department said that location couldn’t work. Camp Murray indicated its security protocols required a minimum distance between waiting vehicles and existing buildings and parking lots, and a Grant Avenue gate wouldn’t meet those standards without reconfiguration, the city manager explained.

The city also felt the extensive mitigation, including five raised crosswalks on Portland and designating a school zone along the corridor so police officers can issue stiffer fines, would serve as a deterrent for pass-through motorists.

The analysis used to justify the move also concluded that leaving the gate where it is “provides the least overall improvement in Camp Murray access and general traffic operations in the Tillicum neighborhood, even assuming approximately $1.3 million in improvements at the Union Avenue SW/Berkeley Street SW intersection.”

The two agencies are finalizing the proposal. Once finalized, the military department can complete the environmental review, leading the city to issue the permit.

Issuance of the permit doesn’t require City Council approval, but Neiditz said he “is not going to propose something if the City Council doesn’t think it’s reasonable.”

City Council members were noncommittal in discussing the new proposal during a presentation last week, indicating that they have more questions about moving the gate.

Leave a comment Comments → 4
  1. The bottom line here is not so much “reasonableness” as representation. The City Council has as its chief responsibility not the rationalization for some course of action but whether in fact, or not, the preferred course protects the people, and preserves and even enhances the vitality, livability, economy, and values of those people and their property. When those governing values are in place, the “overall improvement of Camp Murray access” is found wanting. “Hoped-for” through-traffic slowdowns of Camp Murray employees as they traverse the town through the permanent installation of traffic calming devices when traffic tickets on occasion would accomplish that purpose likewise fails to fit a duly-elected official’s role. Furthermore, as well-articulated by Assistant City Manager Dave Bugher in shredding Camp Murray’s plan last year while then advocating admirably for the neighborhood, Camp Murray’s proposed traffic patterns worsen – not improve – those conditions and positions previously held. The fact of the matter is, Camp Murray doesn’t vote. The people do. The City Council needs to represent the people and make its decision against the standard for which they were elected.

  2. briandenne says:

    Brian Dennery

    This coming Monday evening, August 1 at 7:00 PM will show the Lakewood City Council and the Commander at Camp Murray that we Tillicum residents are not going to take this for a second year. I guess our opposition to the proposed gate last year at this same time did not catch the attention of Camp Murray and the Lakewood city planners. Please listen very carefully to us this coming Monday evening. Please listen to all of our comments at the council meeting. We have listened to all of Camp Murray’s why’s. Now listen to all of our why not’s. Lakewood City Council, please do not forget that you represent us, not Camp Murray.
    Thank you in advance for your anticipated cooperation and working with all of us Tillicum residents.

  3. Noticing all the permits, approvals, and general butt smooching listed in the article as required for a simple gate, I wonder if we could have won World War II if all these agencies and regulations had been in place.

    In that different and alien world, the military simply told the locals what was going to happen and then fired up the bulldozer. The military was generally a good neighbor and didn’t need to be told how to do things here. Now the eco-freaks own the bureaucracy and it doesn’t take any more than that group to defeat the greatest military in the history of the world.

  4. jenmjustice says:

    Hey pgroup,

    I would like to help you become more informed about the issue at hand. This is NOT an Eco-freak (your words) group blocking the military. What is really going on is that the Washington National Guard is trying to buy the city of Lakewood (and the residents of Lakewood) off with $1.2M to force the movement of its gate from the current location at Union Ave SW and Berkeley Ave SW into a residential neighborhood. While many people think the Tillicum neighborhood is a “throw-away” area, there are many involved and concerned citizens to which a grave injustice is about to be perpetrated. What they say are “no significant impacts” to the traffic pattern will in reality cause many problems to a residential area. Sadly, too many that are in favor of this move are out of touch with the neighborhood even though they have spent time here over the last couple of years working on the installation of the sewers and wonderful street improvements. The fact remains – None of them live here! Their traffic studies don’t tell the whole story. It will be a travesty if this action is allowed to move forward. The only winner in this will be the National Guard at the expense of the citizens of Tillicum.
    pgroup….please get informed about the issues.

*
We welcome comments. Please keep them civil, short and to the point. ALL CAPS, spam, obscene, profane, abusive and off topic comments will be deleted. Repeat offenders will be blocked. Thanks for taking part and abiding by these simple rules.

JavaScript is required to post comments.

Follow the comments on this post with RSS 2.0