Word on the Street

The latest news in and around Tacoma, Pierce County and South Puget Sound

NOTICE: Word on the Street has moved.

With the launch of our new website, we've moved Word on the Street.
Visit the new section.

Puyallup council revisiting annexation requirement

Post by Sara Schilling / The News Tribune on April 26, 2011 at 10:49 pm with 2 Comments »
April 26, 2011 10:49 pm

The Puyallup City Council may soon change a city rule that makes consenting to annexation a condition of receiving city water and sewer service outside city limits.

The council spent part of a two-hour study session tonight talking about that portion of city code. Although no action was taken, members seemed to agree that the annexation requirement should be removed.

“My position is that we should not have an annexation requirement,” said Councilman Don Malloy. “I believe when we annex property into the city, we should be annexing people that want to come, not that are obligated to come because of other services we have provided.”

The discussion came about a month after the council approved a $270,000 settlement agreement stemming from a lawsuit centered on exactly that issue.

Mike Stanzel, who owns a family recreation business in unincorporated north Puyallup, took the city to court after he was told he had to consent to annexation in order to get the water availability letter he needed to expand.

He won favorable rulings from a Pierce County Superior Court judge and the state Court of Appeals; last month the council approved the settlement.

The annexation requirement has been on the books since at least 2004, said Kevin Yamamoto, senior assistant city attorney. It’s permissible under state law, although the city doesn’t have to impose it, he said.

“It’s a discretionary decision of the council,” he said during the study session.

The proposed change will come back to the council at a future meeting for a decision.

The council also will look at some other possible changes to that part of code, including  adding incentives – in the form of lower usage rates –  for outside residents seeking water and sewer service who consent to annexation.

Right now, outside residents pay 1 ½ times as much for city water and sewer service as people living inside city limits.



Leave a comment Comments → 2
  1. Puyallup shouldn’t be annexing anything. They should start thinking about the 100 year old infrastructure under the city streets.

  2. “The council also will look at some other possible changes to that part of code, including adding INCENTIVES…… for outside residents seeking water and sewer service who consent to annexation.

    What a bunch of horse $#!+ The city has no business promoting annexation. We (current tax payers) should accept when citizens initiate and request to be annexed, but otherwise focus on maintaining services for those who are currently in the city and have been paying taxes and fees (that we are told aren’t really taxes) for years. Our current services have gone to hell in a feed bag due to overspending on outside legal council, staffing legal and planning departments beyond the need, building the Taj Mahal, trying to be in the retail business, blunders like the 9th/94th street issue, screw ups with the police and fire fighters that resulted in law suits against the city and on and on.

    Whoa you urban cowboy! Hee Haw!

We welcome comments. Please keep them civil, short and to the point. ALL CAPS, spam, obscene, profane, abusive and off topic comments will be deleted. Repeat offenders will be blocked. Thanks for taking part and abiding by these simple rules.

JavaScript is required to post comments.

Follow the comments on this post with RSS 2.0