Seahawks Insider

Did we see the Sherman Effect in the first round?

Post by Todd Dybas / The News Tribune on May 9, 2014 at 12:43 pm with 15 Comments »
May 9, 2014 12:43 pm
Richard Sherman hoists the Lombardi Trophy at the Seahawks' championship parade. / AP photo
Richard Sherman hoists the Lombardi Trophy at the Seahawks’ championship parade. / AP photo

There was a record set in the Thursday’s first round.

Nine defensive backs were selected, the most of any first round in NFL Draft history.

Is this the Richard Sherman (or more so Seattle Seahawks) Effect? Well, sort of.

Let’s back up to the 2011 draft when Sherman fell to the fifth round. What does he remember about it? You won’t be surprised by his answer.

“Being angrier and angrier every pick,” Sherman said. “You don’t expect to get picked in round one. Nobody has talked about me, nobody has said anything.. But, teams have called and said, ‘Oh, we’re thinking about taking you this pick in the second round, this pick in the third round.’ You’ve got several teams telling you that and you expect to get picked then.

“After that day passes, you get frustrated. You feel like, ‘Is every team just lying?’ It takes a long time to get from day two to day three. That’s a long waiting period. You sit by your phone literally for hours and hours and hours at a time, waiting for some kind of message, some kind of reassurance that you’re going to get drafted. Then, day three starts and still no phone call.

“Then the fourth round passes and that’s when it’s like, ‘Dang, I might not get picked.’ That’s when it starts going downhill. Your emotions … you start thinking, ‘Is this it for football?’ Then, you get a call at the end of the fifth round and Seattle makes the best decision they could make (laughs).”

Once Sherman (6-foot-3) was paired with Brandon Browner (6-4), the Seahawks had an enormous duo at corner. Both ended up going to the Pro Bowl and heads were turned.

“It’s a lot different than when I came out,” Sherman said. “When I came out, nobody wanted this model. You’re too tall, too stiff, you don’t run well, you don’t get out of your breaks. For me to change the prototype for what a corner is, is a great thing. The game has always been changing, getting bigger, better, faster stronger receivers who are Calvin Johnson’s size, A.J. Green, Julio Jones, some of the best receivers in the league are huge.

“You still have the DeSean Jacksons who make a tremendous impact, but you also have the Josh Gordons who need bigger corners to corral them sometimes. You give them a chance. I think Brandon, and myself and (Dominique Rodgers-) Cromartie (who is 6-2), who are playing well and being tall, rangy corners are changing that.”

When Sherman was drafted in 2011, three cornerbacks were picked in the first round: Patrick Peterson went fifth overall, Prince Amukamara went 19th and Jimmy Smith went 27th. Overall, 39 cornerbacks were selected.

In 2012, again three corners in the first round: Morris Claiborne went sixth, Stephon Gilmore went 10th and Dre Kirkpatrick went 17th. Overall, 31 corners were picked.

Last year, four corners went in the first round: Dee Milner went ninth, D.J. Hayden 12th, Desmond Trufant 22nd and Xavier Rhodes went 25th. Overall, 29 corners were selected.

That moves us to Thursday’s first round with the record-setting total of nine defensive backs three months after the Seahawks won the Super Bowl. The previous record of seven occurred three times (1998, 2006 and 2013).

Of the five cornerbacks among that record-setting lot of defensive backs, two are six-feet tall: Justin Gilbert (Cleveland Browns) and Kyle Fuller (Chicago Bears). The rest are shorter, all the way down to 5-9.

The overall pursuit of bigger, stronger, faster is going to continue at every position. As is the need to obtain better players to counter the massive amount of passing in the league.

Pete Carroll and John Schneider contend their base model is not revolutionary. Carroll said he has been after big corners since working at North Carolina State in the early 1980s. Reality is, they’re hard to find.

But what happened in the first round yesterday sends a clear message that drafting priorities have shifted and part of the reason for that is the Seahawks being Super Bowl champions. That’s how you end up with nine defensive backs and zero running backs on day one of the draft.

The record-setting nine defensive backs drafted in Round 1:

Justin GilbertCleveland (8)Oklahoma State
Kyle FullerChicago (14)Virginia Tech
Calvin PryorN.Y. Jets (18)Louisville
Ha Ha Clinton-DixGreen Bay (21)Alabama
Darqueze DennardCincinnati (24)Michigan State
Jason VerrettSan Diego (25)Texas Christian
Deone BucannonArizona (27)Washington State
Jimmie WardSan Francisco (30)Northern Illinois
Bradley RobyDenver (31)Ohio State

Leave a comment Comments → 15
  1. GeorgiaHawk says:

    I think It’s the Kam/Thomas effect too.

  2. TallyHawk says:

    Agreed Georgia, having the safeties that the Hawks have sure allows it’s corners to play the way they do.

  3. HawkfaninMT says:

    Shhhh….Dont tell the rest of the league that!

  4. pabuwal says:

    So are we saying that Richard Sherman redefined the CB position?

  5. Macabrevity says:

    I’ve always loved defenses based on strong secondaries, but there’s really never been one that shut people down like ours. Traditionally it was always dominant LB-led defenses and/or overwhelming D-line play that completely crushed people. I really love this defense, and am very optimistic about the 2013 draft class and what those guys are going to do to even improve on last year.

  6. GeorgiaHawk says:

    What happened to the 7-10 WRS that were projected to go in the first round?

    Kiper,& most of the other mock draft experts didn’t pay attention to the Super Bowl like most of the GMS did when the LOB put the boom on all those 1,000 yard WRs.

  7. HawkfaninMT says:

    Meh, I do not begrudge mock drafters at all. They do what they do because we click on their pages. They give their opinions and get flamed for them when they are wrong. I think they were basing their projections more on the quality of wrs and not so much on the fit or tendencies of the NFL.

    I thought 5-7 wrs would get drafted, no trade out of 32 ,and the Hawks would pick Easley. 1/3 aint bad I guess!

  8. GeorgiaHawk says:

    I’ve seen this many CBs taken in the first round but I don’t recall this many Safeties taken.

    Wow that safety from WSU hits like a hammer!

    Darn Arizona! Lol.

  9. montanamike2 says:

    The whole NFC WEST is getting overly ridiculous tough, I can’t wait until next year when we get a bunch of picks. This draft is deep, deep with a lot of really raw prospects. If we get a few hits and especially with that extra 4th, then this will be great, there’s also a bunch of angry/hurt UDFA’s coming in and i bet we get the cream of the crop. And yes Pabs i think Sherman is redefining the CB position.

  10. banosser says:

    The potential next Sherm is still out there. .. WR turned CB.. 6-3 220 4.6

    Stanley Jean-Baptist

  11. montanamike2 says:

    Good call banosser, intriguing prospect.

  12. HawkfaninMT says:

    An intriguing prospect for sure… Will he be there at 64? Do the Hawks feel like him over Maxwell or Lane is the largest upgrade available? I doubt it, but it would be exciting!

  13. montanamike2 says:

    Id take him just to keep him away from other teams.

  14. I’ve decided to call the 64th pick the first pick of the 3rd round. What do you think? One ahead of Houston at 65. So the Seahawks have the 8th pick in the 2nd, 1st in the 3rd, and 12th (108) and the last in the 4th (132 I hear). Is that right? Not sure how that works.

  15. SRVHawk says:






    How exactly did we decide that bigger corner backs are going in the first round? Jean-Baptiste didn’t go in the first round. So how exactly did we see a Sherm effect?

We welcome comments. Please keep them civil, short and to the point. ALL CAPS, spam, obscene, profane, abusive and off topic comments will be deleted. Repeat offenders will be blocked. Thanks for taking part and abiding by these simple rules.

JavaScript is required to post comments.

Follow the comments on this post with RSS 2.0