| 2012 Stats | Hawks | Cardinals |
| 2012 Record | 7-5 | 4-8 |
| Total Yards Gained | 3,943 | 3,349 |
| Total Offense (NFLRank) | 328.6(24) | 279.1(32) |
| Rush Offense | 141.3(7) | 81.5(31) |
| Pass Offense | 187.2(30) | 197.6(27) |
| Points Per Game | 20.2(22) | 15.5(32) |
| Total Yards Allowed | 3,761 | 3,896 |
| Total Defense | 313.4(4) | 324.7(7) |
| Rush Defense | 110.6 (12) | 128.6 (24) |
| Pass Defense | 202.8(5) | 196.1(3) |
| Points Allowed/Game | 16.8(3) | 19.5(7) |
| Possession Avg. | 31:30 | 29:30 |
| Sacked/Yds. Lost | 23/145 | 48/304 |
| Sacks Made/Yds. Lost | 30/187 | 33/198 |
| Interceptions By | 10 | 18 |
| Penalties/Yds. | 82/636 | 78/669 |
| Punts/Avg. | 54/46.9 | 83/46.6 |
| Turnover Differential | +1(13) | +7(T8) |
*
The Cards may only be 4-8 and we are 7-5, but I wish they were 3-9 and we were 8-4. And except for a few dropped passes that would have been the case.
Here is hoping they go to 4-9 and we go to 8-5.
× Flag comment
Wasn’t aware their pass defense was ranked that well. Looks like a “Beast Mode” Sunday!!!!
× Flag comment
Helenahawk? As in Helena, MT? The Insider is getting quite the Montana following here! Maybe stores will actually start selling some Seahawks gear around here!
× Flag comment
HawkfaninMT- Could be Helen Ga too, or my aunt Helen. Maybe not. Lol.
× Flag comment
I guess this shows that you can win the TO battle significantly and still suck.
These stats also show the fallacy of using passing yards per game as a major set of data to judge a teams’ passing attack, as some on here have done repeatedly. They’re rated 3 spots above us, but their passing attack is not even in the same ballpark as ours IMO. 2 of their QBs are just PATHETIC and, Kolb is decent but never healthy for more than 3 games in a row.
× Flag comment
8 straight losses is all we need to know.
At home. Statistically better. Divisional opponent or not, if we don’t have this game in the bag by halftime, something is wrong.
× Flag comment