Seahawks Insider

Trusting your evaluation key to selecting QB

Post by Eric Williams on Feb. 23, 2012 at 9:36 am with 10 Comments »
February 23, 2012 9:36 am
Tennessee head coach Mike Munchak talks with reporters at the NFL Scouting Combine in Indianapolis. (Eric Williams/TNT)

And we’re off.

I heard some interesting comments about evaluating the quarterback position as it pertains to the Seattle Seahawks.

Seattle likely will not have an opportunity to draft Stanford’s Andrew Luck or Baylor’s Robert Griffin III because they’re too far down in the first round at No. 11 or No. 12 overall, depending on the coin flip with Kansas City on Friday.

However, I talked to Tennessee general manager Ruston Webster about selecting Jake Locker with the team’s No. 8 overall pick in 2011. The Titans were in a similar situation last year as Seattle is in this year, with Cam Newton and Blaine Gabbert projected to go in the top five.

Newton of course went No. 1 overall to Carolina, but the Titans had the opportunity to select Gabbert and ultimately passed, selecting Locker instead even though several draft analysts had the University of Washington product as a late first-round pick.

Webster, a former Seahawks personnel executive, said it’s important to trust your evaluation process and not worry about what everyone else believes.

“We had Jake rated high,” Webster said. “And the one thing we’re going to always do is trust our scouts, and our own grades. And we feel like we put a lot of work into it, whether it’s the quarterbacks, defensive line or offensive line – whatever. We’re going to trust our own grades and go with what we know.”

Webster said overall the team was pleased with the way former Seahawks quarterback Matt Hasselbeck performed in his first season with Tennessee, helping to lead the Titans to a 9-7 record and just barely missing the playoffs.

“I thought he played really well,” Webster said. “And I thought he made a difference for us, just in his ability to run the team. He had some great games, especially early. When we lost Kenny Britt, had we not had him (Hasselbeck) I think it would have been really difficult.”

Now the Titans have a difficult decision. Hasselbeck is in the second year of a three-year, $20 million deal, while Locker is the quarterback of the future and needs to play.

Hasselbeck has a non-guaranteed base salary of $5.5 million 2012.

Tennessee head coach Mike Munchak said Hasselbeck will go into the upcoming season as the starter, but there will be an open competition.

“The negative side is you can’t play both of them at the same time, so you do you make two guys happy when they’re that competitive,” Munchak said. “I think that is the tough part. And neither one of them want the job handed to them. They want to compete for it, and we’ll try to do the best we can when we start in May and June and when we get to training camp, is to put them into situations where they truly are competing.
“And hopefully it becomes obvious who the best guy is to lead the team.”

So how do you balance a quarterback’s measurables like height, arm strength and athleticism versus someone with good intangibles like Boise State’s Kellen Moore?

“I think 32 teams are battling that right now right?” San Francisco general manager Trent Baalke said. “And you’re looking at the film, and you’re looking at the stats, the production and the winning. And what the most important thing for a quarterback to do – it’s to win games, find a way to win and lead their team to victory.

“And Kellen’s done it better than anybody in the history of college football. And so that has to mean something. What it means to me is different to what it means to the next person. But you’re certainly taking a look at what they’ve done in the past, because it’s usually a pretty good indicator of what they’re going to do in the future.”

Categories:
NFL Draft
Leave a comment Comments → 10
  1. Dukeshire says:

    Interesting stuff, Eric. This is why the Tod McShay’s don’t consult NFL teams.

  2. RDPoulsbo says:

    I’m always weary of the he’s a winner argument at draft time. David Greene was the winningest QB in NCAA history when Seattle drafted him and look how he turned out.

    Scouts are paid to make these draft boards while the Tod McShay’s pretend to be experts this time of year. There are very few national reporters I follow regarding the draft. If anything, there are just not enough hours in a day to be on TV while following all 32 NFL teams and college prospects to have any in depth knowledge. Team scouts are paid year round to evaluate players for their own team and nothing else.

  3. Reports out of Carolina that they have to cut salary to get under the cap have Jimmy Clausen getting cut. I know that Pete Carroll and John Schneider were interested in drafting him two years ago. Could he be on the Seahawks radar? Maybe they still see potential in that guy. Clausen to Tate once more?

  4. GeorgiaHawk says:

    I hope Kellen Moore does well in the NFL. It is always enjoyable for me to see players that may not have the desired measurables succeed over the ones that do because of their intangibles.
    Like Baldwin! They are just more fun to root for, imo.

  5. Dukeshire says:

    RD – You and I are I’m the minority. Far too many people put stock into their “expertise”.

  6. ESPN is like Access Hollywood and Entertainment Tonight, that’s why the McShay’s are out there. Unfortunately, for the small minority that actually have some insight and want to watch true anylsis without the hype and drama, the majority of America is full of people who crave the sensationalism and that’s what brings in the money. These shows are becoming more and more prevelant because of this and is probably one of the reasons the country is in the state that it is in, thanks McShay. As for Clausen rollin’ up here, that’s a joke right?

  7. Dukeshire says:

    “ESPN is like Access Hollywood and Entertainment Tonight,”…

    Amen to that, and why I really can’t stand ESPN.

  8. I used to be a big fan of the mother ship but they are so full of bs when breaking news that other people have actually put in the work. Most of their analysts are dbags ie Teddy the patriot way Bruschi, Trent thank god Ray Lewis got me a superbowl ring Dilfer, etc… The list goes on…

  9. “the majority of America is full of people who crave the sensationalism”

    I wonder if this is really true. I agree, the networks and the advertisers believe it. But is it really true? Alas Babylon.

  10. Obviously, if Seattle is in love with Tannehill and takes him, and he turns out to be a good NFL qb–like Hasselbeck–then he wont have been a reach at 11 or 12. Decent NFL qb’s are hard to come by.

    But its a big risk to take. In hindsight, I think Seattle might have taken Locker if he’d fallen that far. They admitted they liked Dalton, and considered drafting him. Locker fit their mobile, strong-armed qb mold even if he wasnt overly accurate in college.

    So it wouldnt shock me to see them pick Tannehill–if Tannehill isnt taken by Washington or Cleveland or anyone else.

*
We welcome comments. Please keep them civil, short and to the point. ALL CAPS, spam, obscene, profane, abusive and off topic comments will be deleted. Repeat offenders will be blocked. Thanks for taking part and abiding by these simple rules.

JavaScript is required to post comments.

Follow the comments on this post with RSS 2.0