Seahawks Insider Sponsored by xfinity

Seahawks Insider » General Seahawks » Mayock on Hawks’ draft: Don’t rule out Locker

Seahawks Insider

Mayock on Hawks’ draft: Don’t rule out Locker

Post by Eric Williams on Feb. 17, 2011 at 1:03 pm with 51 Comments »
February 17, 2011 1:04 pm
Washington quarterback Jake locker (AP file photo).

NFL Network draft guru Mike Mayock answered draft-related questions during a conference call for about an hour this morning.

I asked him about the Seattle’s draft needs at No. 25 heading into April’s draft, and Mayock said the Seahawks have to figure out what they plan to do at quarterback.

Mayock said he’s still is a believer in Washington quarterback Jake Locker, even though he had issues with accuracy. And he believes Seattle should do its homework on the Washington product as a possibility at No. 25, depending on whether or not they bring back Matt Hasselbeck in free agency, and believe in Charlie Whitehurst as a future franchise quarterback for the team.

“From a quarterback perspective they’ve got to make some decisions obviously right now,” he said. “Matt Hasselbeck is not getting any younger, and Whitehurst had an interesting season. He had some highlights, especially at the end of the season there. But I don’t think he answered all the questions. So the first thing that Pete Carroll and those guys have to decide is, are they looking at a quarterback there.

“And there’s a guy right down the street who’s got first-round ability, but hasn’t always shown that. So it’d be interesting to see what their evaluation of Jake Locker is, because that’s a really talented kid who has first-round potential, but who’s struggled in the pocket. And a lot of people are writing him off, and I’m not. I think you’ve got to do a bunch of homework on him.”

So should the Seahawks take a quarterback at No. 25?

“They’ve got to evaluate their two guys first, and if they’re not sure and there’s one there, they’ve got to take him,” said Mayock about the Seahawks, if the team believes a franchise quarterback is available when they select in the first round.

Right now, Mayock has Missouri quarterback Blaine Gabbert as his top-rated quarterback, followed Locker, Auburn’s Cam Newton, Ryan Mallet of Arkansas and Andy Dalton of TCU.

“I’ve probably seen at least seven of his games, and purely on tape he reminds of the guys who have done well in this league,” Mayock said about Gabbert. “He reminds me of (Sam) Bradford. He reminds me of Matt Ryan. And if you look at the last, three years, NFL teams have done a really good job with their first-round quarterbacks. There’s been like six hits in a row with no busts.”

Mayock said Gabbert, Locker, Newton and Mallet all have first-round talent, but he does not necessarily give them all first-round grades, saying Gabbert is the only top 10 pick out of the four.

And Mayock is not sold on Mallet as a first-round selection.

“The problem with this kid is every time I get excited, he does something from a decision-making or an accuracy perspective that bothers me,” Mayock said. “And I think the common denominator is when he goes bad, it’s because of pressure in the pocket – when he can’t step up, when he can’t see and doesn’t have clear vision, then I believe his production goes way down.

“So, having said all of those things, I would be very concerned about taking him in the first round.”

In his second-tier of quarterbacks, Mayock has Dalton, Florida’s Christian Ponder, Iowa’s Ricky Stanzi and Nevada’s Colin Kaepernick.

Mayock does not believe Florida interior offensive lineman Mike Pouncey will be available when Seattle selects at No. 25, but he mentioned Baylor’s Danny Watkins as fringe first-round guy who could satisfy the Seahawks’ needs for an interior lineman.

He liked Georgia’s Clint Boling as probably more of a second-round guy. And he said John Moffitt of Wisconsin and Rodney Hudson of Florida State as second-to-third-round guys.

Mayock also mentioned Marcus Cannon of TCU and William Rackley of Lehigh as potential mid-round guys who likely will be interior linemen at the next level.

In terms of offensive tackles, Mayock has five guys as potential first-round picks – Anthony Castonzo of Boston College, Colorado’s Nate Solder, Tyron Smith of USC, Wisconsin’s Gabe Carimi and Derek Sherrod of Mississippi State.

Mayock said this year’s draft is deeper in terms of talent in the first round than he’s seen in the past several years because of talent at defensive line. Right now, he has eight or nine guys at defensive line with first round grades, and noted that usually four defensive ends go in the first round in a typical year.

So what does that mean for Seattle? They could get a pretty good defensive linemen or offensive tackle in the first round because of the depth at those two positions.

“If you’re looking for a corner at the end of the first round, you might have a problem,” Mayock said. “If you’re looking for a defensive end, a defensive tackle or maybe an offensive tackle, you’re in luck. So it’s about whether your needs meet up with the strength of this year’s draft.”

Some tidbits:

* Mayock considers Patrick Peterson and Prince Amukamara the top two corners in the draft, but believes there is a significant drop off after that.

“I’m not sure of the kid from Texas, Aaron Williams. And I don’t like the Miami kid up there, Brandon Harris,” Mayock said.

* Mayock mentioned Missouri defensive end Aldon Smith, Temple defensive tackle Muhammad Wilkerson and possibly California defensive end Cameron Jordan as defensive line types who could still be around when Seattle drafts at No. 25.

* With the uncertainty of when free agency will take place, Mayock said teams still will treat the draft the same way, looking at it with a long-range vision instead of a way to fill short-term needs.

“I think you can get in trouble if you start putting the cart before the horse,” Mayock said. “You don’t even know what free agency is going to look like this year – four years, six years, what’s it going to be and who’s going to be available?

“So I think what you have to do is go back to the basics. … which is who fits are scheme and we’re going to go get them. I think if you start looking for Band-aids because the CBA is so uncertain this year, I think long term is going to hurt you.”

Categories:
General Seahawks
Leave a comment Comments → 51
  1. AaronCurryIsBUST says:

    I have no problem with Jake Locker at # 25. Why? Because he’s a value pick, someone who was once considered a top of the draft QB prospect. VALUE picks are better than REACHING on pieces of ship like Aaron Curry and Kelly Jennings and Chris Spencer who are GARBAGE football players who inflate their draft stock through the combine.

  2. SeahawkFan12 says:

    …and Whitehurst is NOT a franchise QB. I kinda doubt Locker will be there at 25, but if he is and Pouncey is not, I’d have very little heartburn over drafting Locker at 25 and having Hasselbeck mentor him to lead the franchise in 2 years.

  3. I’ve always had trouble with quarterbacks who didn’t complete at least 60% of passes, while in college, but Locker could potentially end up being the best quarterback in the draft, and with a year or maybe even two (maybe stretching it on that one) on the bench, he should be NFL ready. I could name five positions I’d rather have us picking though, but I’m warming up to the idea of Locker, he seems like a good kid.

    Speaking of quarterbacks, have you guys seen some of the latest mock drafts/discussions? Cam Newton #1 overall? That seems insane to me.

  4. chuck_easton says:

    ACIB,

    While you have alot more people on your side with your Curry matter I would not call taking him at #4 a REACH. In fact there was some talk that year that Curry could go #1.

    Did all the draft experts get it wrong? Looks like a big yes. Did Seattle REACH for him at #4? At the time it appeared to everyone who is paid to do this stuff for a living that it was the closest thing to a sure bet and Seattle was ‘lucky’ that he fell all the way to the #4 spot.

    Nobody envisioned him being the disappointment he’s been to date.

  5. In the limited exposure I saw from Locker, overall, I like what’s there in terms of him being Matt’s successor (in 2013). If he’s there at #25, I have no problem waiting until the 2nd round in drafting a left guard or right tackle. If Locker and Pouncey are available, I still go with the quarterback.

  6. Sarcasticus says:

    I love everything about Locker except his accuracy. I just don’t know enough about the mechanics at the quarterback position to know if what he is doing is correctable.

  7. Dukeshire says:

    I hope they pass on Locker, should he ben there. And it’s not because they’re set at QB either, that’s for sure. Athleticism aside, he hasn’t shown that he’s a very good QB, IMO.

    I love reading this from Mayock;
    “If you’re looking for a defensive end, a defensive tackle or maybe an offensive tackle, you’re in luck. So it’s about whether your needs meet up with the strength of this year’s draft.” I think Mayock’s one of the best talent evaluators around. I really value his opinion.

  8. Sticking with my last 2 years wants Big Ugglies first. OG, OT, C, DL, DE.
    Free Agency is tough this year and Mankins is already locked up. so 1st rounder needs to be a Big Uggly.
    Locker is mid to late 2nd rounder due to his accuracy problems.
    He’s a local kid and everyone wants to see him do well but reality is if you can’t hit your receiver you can’t play in the NFL where coverages are just a little bit tighter than in college. Since there is no wishbone offense in the NFL where Lockers feet would aid him I say no to drafting him in first round.
    2nd round, maybe were talking there.
    Without a decent O line any QB we have will be stuck in mediocracy because of no running game, teams will just play the pass and blitz the rooky blind. Build a solid line find a good trainee QB for Hass to teach a year or two.

  9. Chuck… good statement….
    Myself included, many felt Curry s/b the number one pick….. I was elated when we got him…. I’m not ready to throw in the towel on him yet, but he needs to step up…. THIS SEASON! Though he got here first, he’s the ‘Golden Tate’ on the defensive side….

  10. GeorgiaHawk says:

    No way Locker drops to 25! However I hope I am wrong. Pete would snag Locker up in a heart beat. In the four years that he played at Washington he proved beyond a doubt that he is a top qb! Oh but the naysayers say that he has accuracy issues. For most of his College career he had to play for one of the worst teams in the ncaa. Dropped passes, crappy o-line, lousy defense! Kinda reminds me of what Hasselbeck has had to deal with the last four years.

  11. GeorgiaHawk says:

    BobbyK- The Seahawks picking Locker would put a big smile on your face! Almost as big as if they were to get Hutch back!

  12. Well…. we all see the scenario of CW at QB…. everything that I’ve heard is, he practices poorly…. In games, he hasn’t been poor by any stretch… Not a franchise QB, but far from poor.
    Point is, the decisions surrounding him will be the same decisions, by the same decision makers, as will be made about Locker if he’s there at our pick… QB is sooooo key! Even if you draft wrong one year and go back the next for another, there’s still no guarantee you have the franchise guy!
    It would surprise me if we took him…. Something tells me we will trade our #1
    for multiple picks …. strengthening with OL & DL picks in the process….

  13. Dukeshire says:

    I’m curious, at what point does Locker bear some responsibility for those Husky loses? Everyone but him was awful? I just don’t see what he’s proved that warrants a 1st round pick. That said, there are enough teams inside the top 10 desperate enough for a QB, that he may just go that early.

    If he’s there at 25 and the Seahawks select him over Pouncey or Solder or Carimi or Kerrigan (should they be there) I’ll lose a lot of faith in Carroll / Schneider.

  14. AaronCurryIsBUST says:

    On the flip side Dukeshire I’d be infuriated if we passed on Locker for any of those players. Locker has the potential to be an elite starter at the most important position. Nate Solder sucks and has poor leverage, Carimi simply cannot pass protect well at all, Pouncey is not as good a prospect as his brother but is getting hyped because they share the same last name. Kerrigan looks too undersized in the NFL despite his production just like Nick Reed.

  15. No QB in the first round please. The Seahawks have other pressing needs. I’d trade up and pounce on Pouncey before I locked myself into Locker. In the second round, I might ponder Ponder.

  16. Dukeshire says:

    ACIB – If you think Solder sucks and Carimi is poor in pass pro, I’m curious how you justify Locker having “elite” capability?

    Kerrigan and Carimi dominated all season and at the Sr Bowl in nearly every drill, practice, and game (in Kerrigan’s case. Carimi sprained his ankle and couldn’t go.) Solder was dominant at RT all week as well.

    With due respect, the more you post off-topic of your namesake, the less credibility you have. And it’s not that you disagree with me, it’s that you support your argument with hyperbole.

    Is ACIB Snydro22? That last post is remarkably similar…

  17. Georgia – Losing Hutch made me mad to no end. I really still haven’t gotten over it and, I don’t care what anybody says, the Seahawks haven’t gotten over it either.

    If we pass on Locker to draft Pouncey (although I have my doubts either will actually be there), I’ll be fine with that. I’ll support it. I think Pouncey is a safer pick, it’s just that I value the QB position more than every other position by a large margin.

    Duke – you’re a big Mayock guy and he likes Locker. :)

  18. GeorgiaHawk says:

    I’m curious Dukeshire how much responsibility you think Locker bears for those Husky loses? Clutch play is what I look at as the most important attribute a QB can have. How many game winning drives has Locker lead the Huskies this year?
    So what is it exacly that you don’t see in Locker that doesn’t warrant a 1st round pick?

    I would gain more faith in Carroll/Schneider if they were to draft Locker at 25. It would be without a doubt the steal of the draft!

    Again I seriously doubt that Locker will last beyond the tenth pick, and it has nothing to do with teams being desperate. I just hope like hell that some teams have the same view that Dukeshire has on Locker.

  19. Dukeshire says:

    Bobby – He’s not sold on Locker at all. He’s said numerous times he can’t figure him out. Because he’s not “writing him off” doesn’t mean he sold either.

    And for the record (or hundredth time, whichever) I want to like Locker. He has everything one would want in a QB, with the exception of skill. I’m just skeptical he can develop into the player one would be expected, if taken in the 1st.

  20. GeorgiaHawk says:

    BobbyK- Hutch was probably in my top five Seahawk players of all time, and I will never get over losing him! You know I’m a huge Locker fan, however if we do pass on Locker for Pouncey then I will not be all that disapointed.

  21. Dukeshire says:

    Georgia – We just view him so differently. I say quite a bit. A college QB can effect his team in far greater ways than in the pros. I never saw any type of sustained, quality play from him. Over his career at U-Dub, I’ve seen a player that has hurt his team more than helped. To his credit, there is no quit in him and he’s led some (few) terrific comebacks, that I would argue would not have been necessary with competent play from the QB. His last game against Nebraska, for example. Yes, there were drops. But yes too, there was some terrible passes as well. That first half was atrocious. And again, to his credit, he doesn’t quit.

    Look, if the ‘Hawks end up with him, I’ll root my ass off for him. But my expectations will be very low, I’m afraid. If they take him and he tears it up, I’ll be the first to say I was terribly wrong. Gladly, I might add.

  22. AaronCurryIsBUST says:

    How do I justify Locker having elite capability? What kind of stupid question is that? He has everything you could want in a QB, powerful arm, experience in a pro-style offense, elite intangibles, excellent mobility and athleticism, perfect mechanics, and clutch ability. Is he inaccurate? No, if you take out UW WRs many blatant drops he has a completion percentage well over 60 percent!! He is inconsistent but that can be fixed.

    Carimi did not dominate all season, I watche him closely and he was completely abused at times. There’s a reason he is viewed as strictly a RT even though he was an LT his whole college career. I was more impresse with his fellow linemate LG John Moffitt!!!

  23. GeorgiaHawk says:

    Dukeshire- I am not 100% sold on any QB from College coming into the NFL. For what it is worth, after LSU played the Huskies two years ago some players on the LSUs defensive side said that Locker was better than Tebow. I know on paper that’s not saying much,however imagine if Locker played on a College team as talented as Florida! And imagine how Tebow would have done on arguably one of the worst teams in the country!

  24. maddog12 says:

    ESPN reporting NFLPA and owners to enter mediation.

  25. It’s not like either side can be made to do anything, but it’s definitely a step in the right direction. It’d be nice to get something done by March 3.

  26. maddog12 says:

    It sure would be nice to get something done by 3/3. Let hope they manage to get it done.

  27. Sarcasticus says:

    “No, if you take out UW WRs many blatant drops he has a completion percentage well over 60 percent!” Is this speculation on your part or has this been reported somewhere?

  28. GeorgiaHawk says:

    Sarcasticus- It’s true about the drops. And if you add to that the sacks it helps put everything into perspective as to what Locker had to work with in his College career. Especially his first 2 1/2 years. Just compare it all to what Luck had to work with.

  29. Dukeshire says:

    ACIB – He’s not inaccurate? Wow. Locker has “perfect” mechanics? Mayock and Charles Davis both criticized his footwork, drop from center and throwing motion repeatedly during the Sr Bowl week, for what that’s worth. The good news is that those things can be corrected. But the truth is, your perception of him simply does not equal the reality of his on field production. The only thing you said that I agree with is that I too like Moffett, but it’s only an opinion.

    Bobby / Maddog – second that!

    Georgia – God would never have let Tebow struggle with inferior talent. lol

  30. GeorgiaHawk says:

    You know what Dukeshire, I probably should get off of this Locker bandwagon, or at least distance myself from it before I Jinx him and/or the team for choosing him. After all I thought I was so sure about Curry when we picked him! lol.

  31. GeorgiaHawk says:

    Seriously though, or at least semi-seriously I think we should get all our minds collectively together and start to develope a strategy that can persuade Hutch into coming back and finishing his career as a Seahawk. Any ideas on how we can make that happen?

  32. Not sure how good a fit Hutch is in the ZBS.

    Mr Williams:
    If there isn’t a CBA by the time the draft rolls around, will teams be able to make draft pick trades including players currently on trading team’s rosters?

  33. Macabrevity says:

    Locker is a tough one for most hardcore Seattle football fans. He’s hard not to like, from his days at Ferndale, to the loyalty and poise he showed through some tough seasons at the UW. Great personality, great teammate, whoever you’re asking… and yes, tons of athletic ability, but accuracy is really such a huge issue. I kinda think the guy should stick with baseball, but who knows? It’s pretty rare that a low percentage thrower in college comes into the NFL and actually improves in that area, but Josh Freeman managed it. Maybe Locker could be the next Josh Freeman?

  34. maddog12 says:

    Several mocks I have seen have Locker going to SF in the first. They claim his skill set is more well suited to Jim Harbaugh’s offense. Which, when you couple recent critiques of his passing accuracy, makes it sound like Harbaugh needs a qb with good leadership skills who has an inaccurate arm. As a loyal Seahawks fan that is exactly what I want the 49ers to end up with an inaccurate passer who can march them down the field with hand-offs and then throw the interception.

    I don’t know if Locker’s accuracy thing is real or not. But I sure hear it alot from people who get paid to be objective critics. In any event, I think he will be gone by the Seahawks pick making this whole debate useless.

  35. Sarcasticus says:

    I watched the Huskies games. I know receivers dropped the ball. I in no way insinuated to the contrary. The comment was made that his completion percentage would be well over 60% if we counted those drops as completions.

    I am curious to know if someone has actually figured this out somewhere. Was there research done or are we just spouting hyperbole? I want to see Locker do well. I like him as a football player. I am concerned about his ability to complete the football. If someone has a link where this has been discussed and proven to be a fact that he was a very accurate qb to the tune of 60%+ (counting drops); I would like to see it. Otherwise, the statement is purely opinion and adds nothing to the serious discussion some are trying to have.

  36. “I want to like Locker. He has everything one would want in a QB, with the exception of skill.”

    LOL, that’s rich, Dukeshire!

    Pouncey, Carimi, Solder, Kerrigan, I’m with you on all those guys and would be very happy to have any of them as Seahawks. Much safer bets than Jake. And who in Seattle really needs to see another first round bust? Not that Locker is likely to be a total bust, he’s a quality person, but he’s unlikely to ever become a precision pocket passer similar to the NFL’s top QBs.

  37. Agree to a CBA, allow year 4 players to be FAs as was the case before ’10, get rid of the franchise tag and sign Mankins/Kalil so we can quit complaining so much about our offensive line!

  38. Dukeshire says:

    klm – Hutch has made 4 pro bowls with Minn and they run a zone.

  39. Sarcasticus says:

    Doug Farrar penned this a couple weeks ago, and I thought it was a good read. I like the quotes he got from Milloy and Rang.

    http://www.footballoutsiders.com/college-relevant/2011/cover-2-qbs-2011-draft-part-i

    I think the consensus is that Locker is just so hard to project.

  40. Dukeshire says:

    Good read. Thanks for passing along.

  41. Duke –
    Why do you always have to be right? Hutch (6-5/313, 33) has been to the ProBowl 4 times in MIN and was named All-Pro 3 times there. They lauded his abilities “pulling and zone-blocking”. Except for this, his 10th, season when he broke his thumb and landed on IR after 11 games, he’s been in the probowl as a starting LG every year there. And yup, Childress did run a ZBS and it looks like the new OL coach is there to try and improve their ZBing.

    Remember that Venn diagram (probably from Gibbs) that had “strength” as the top bubble, “athleticism” as the lower right bubble and “intelligence” as the lower left one? Gibbs wanted players that fit in the overlap space between the lower two bubbles. I always thought of Hutch as a road-grading power blocker (strong – like Mankins). But he also had great ability at pulling, footwork, attitude and smarts, athleticism, everything Gibbs could want for a ZBing LG.

    But many fans in MIN want their OL to drop the ZBS. They say they have personnel better fitted for a drive-blocking OL, http://bleacherreport.com/articles/336985-minnesota-vikings-offensive-line-woes said that “Steve Hutchinson (LG) plays with a well-known mean streak, driving his men into the ground and never letting anyone past him. Not this past season, though. “Hutch” is as pure as you can ask for in a “Man Drive Blocking Scheme.” He’s not a good “Read and React Zone Blocking” guard, and never will be.” I’ve seen this sentiment echoed in several Viking fans comments. Their HC said that ‘MIN’s OL will play whatever scheme gets AP the most yards.’ Then he went out and hired a ZBing OL AC.

    I haven’t watched enough Viking games and paid enough attention to see how well Hutch double teams with his adjacent tackle or center and passes off the defender and then gets to the LB at the 2nd level, or cut-blocks the DL guy to open a gap and let his adjacent OLer get to his 2nd level block, while leading the RB/FB, to know for myself how well Hutch actually fits the ZBS. ProBowl voters should though. Every time I think about Hutch it hurts. Dang Randal for talking up MIN to Hutch!

  42. freedom_X says:

    Most fans want drive-blocking. It’s easier to understand. People don’t like thinking about football in terms of science and cutsey schemes. They would rather think of line play as 5 warriors beating the tar out of the man in front of them, instead of a unit playing as a team. A ZBS scheme has 5 soldiers working together to win the battle. But drive blocking fits best to the image that most people conceive of with football.

    But if I am using military terms – there’s a big difference between a warrior and a soldier. On the real battlefield, 1 warrior usually beats 1 soldier, but 10 soliders can beat 20 warriors. And that’s why modern armies are comprised of soldiers, not warriors – soliders fight as a team, not as individuals.

  43. freedom_X says:

    Let’s move on from the past. Hutchinson is still good, but he’s declining. The past is the past, if Seattle did bring him back it would probably be just as Hutchinson is dropping off to mediocrity. That story has been repeated over and over in Seattle sports history.

    It’s true that Locker was affected by mediocre receiver play – I don’t criticize him for his terrible passing numbers in the Holiday Bowl. The Husky receivers were pushed around like junior high players by the Nebraska secondary. They were run out of bounds, knocked off their routes, and showed little taste for competing. Locker did the correct thing in not forcing throws.

    But, ultimately, receivers are IMHO a less critical element in the passing game than the QB by far. Deion Branch is mediocrity personified in Seattle – goes back to New England and looks like a star again. Seattle goes 13-3 and to the Super Bowl and later posts 4,000 yd passing seasons with no Pro Bowl receivers. Teams like New England, Indianpolis, and San Diego suffer waves of injuries or defections to their receiving corps and don’t miss a beat.

    I think it’s possible that if Locker can get 3-4 years to groove himself in the same system, he could be a top QB. I view him as a slow learner – not an instinctive, natural QB. He’s somewhat like McNabb. He won’t be able to bounce from system to system like other QB’s and pick things up quickly. But if he’s in a stable system for a while, that could unlock his physical gifts.

    Plus, from the fan standpoint, there’s always the risk of Locker being the next Tim Lincecum. (though all the pre-draft question marks and Locker’s mediocre season may defuse that.) Anyway, I have enough confidence in Schneider and Carroll that, if they think Locker can play, I’d be happy with the pick.

  44. MattandCindy says:

    klm008 says:
    February 18, 2011 at 9:52 am
    Duke -
    Why do you always have to be right?

    Hmmm….good question. If Duke answers it right, then I guess we’ll know for sure.

  45. This team should pick up Bob Sanders.

  46. I’ll take Bob Sanders in a heartbeat if I can be promised he’ll start 12-14 games. If not, then I’ll pass. I know anyone can get hurt, but he’s always got something wrong with him. There’s a pattern that I don’t like.

  47. GeorgiaHawk says:

    I hear you BobbyK, I cringe every time I see Trufant, Tatupu, Jennings, and even Earl Thomas have to make make a physical tackle. I just don’t want them to end up like Sanders. I hope we get some more bigger players up front.

  48. Dukeshire says:

    Lol… I wish I were always right. I’m just a guy who watches (and records then watches and re-watches) as many NFL games as possible (and watches and records as many college games as my girlfriend will tolerate) and still usually gets it wrong. My Christmas presents the past couple years have been of print books on football coaching (including Bill Walsh’s, Finding The Winning Edge and B.W. “Bernie” Bierman’s Winning Football. Pure gold…). I’m gunning for Eric’s job… lol! I can’t wait for Bill Belicheck to publish his books. They’re coming and they will be brilliant.

  49. HawkyHann says:

    The Great White Hype, homer Husky boy, will be extremely gross in the NFL as a QB. Don’t even consider this baseball throwing motion QB. You can’t fix it. He will be great at special teams though.

    Did we really pass on Colt McCoy for another WR shrimp, who cant produce-Golden No Brains Tate? He was right there for us. Good pick Holmgren.

  50. nighthawk2 says:

    I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again, Mayock is an idiot. I don’t know what his man-crush on Locker is, but Locker sucks. He blows chuncks. Locker stinks on ice. He not only isn’t a 1st round pick, he isn’t a 2nd round pick. If Seattle wastes a draft pick on this bum, especially the 25th overall, Carroll and Schneider should be dragged behind a car. I’d volunteer mine. Hell, I’ll supply the chains. Drafting that worthless waste of a roster spot would set this team back 5 years, well 5 more than the years Tim Numbskull already set us back.

  51. Dukeshire says:

    You’ve been wrong before and you’ll be wrong again… Mayock is at worst reasonable. He doesn’t have a “man-crush” on Locker. He’s stated time and time again he struggles to align Lockers talent to his poor play. What Mayock said was, that after Seattle evaluated both Hass and CW, they need to figure out if a QB is in their plans in the 1st. And if so, they need to “do their homework” on Locker. Could you be any more reactionary, nighthawk? Unlikely, especially for a self proclaimed liberal.

*
We welcome comments. Please keep them civil, short and to the point. ALL CAPS, spam, obscene, profane, abusive and off topic comments will be deleted. Repeat offenders will be blocked. Thanks for taking part and abiding by these simple rules.

JavaScript is required to post comments.

Follow the comments on this post with RSS 2.0