As for a few years of FS in Lucas. I’m not sure what evidence there is that he can be anywhere near physical enough to play safety. At the very best (and that “best” would be a major long shot) he would serve as yet another stop gap until the position is addressed in earnest. Not interested.

There is really no way of knowing where the ‘Hawks are with relation to the cap. There will be players released, contracts will be reworked and all the signings of FAs and players brought up and resigned to the PS to sort out. I don’t think we’ll know where they stand until the end of the season, February or March.

I don’t get the Lucas demotion. While Wilson is a big time playmaker, he has shown little ability to cover while Lucas has been solid in coverage this year.

Today will answer our questions on Babineaux at FS and Wilson vs Lucas. Matching up with Arizona in Arizona is where reputations are made or destroyed.

If the Seahawks win this game, it will be because the secondary brings its A game to play. I don’t see much success for the Seahawks offense here.

In an unrelated note, if Wilson has beaten out Lucas it isn’t because Lucas is bad. He’s a good, solid CB. Why can’t Lucas have a good few years of FS in him? I know some former good CBs had done that with positive results. We certainly could use a FS. He’s big, physical enough. I know he’s a FA at the end of the year, but he could be the answer at FS. One thing I hate about FS like Brian Russell… they have NO ability to cover anyone one on one if they are asked to do so or caught in a specific situation that demands they do so. Lucas would bring flexibility to the position too. I don’t know. Maybe I’m way off base?