Seahawks Insider Sponsored by xfinity

Seahawks Insider » Jim Mora Press Conference » Mora press conference: OT Locklear takes field

Seahawks Insider

Mora press conference: OT Locklear takes field

Post by Ryan Divish on Nov. 4, 2009 at 11:26 am with 28 Comments »
November 4, 2009 12:06 pm

Here’s some notes from Jim Mora’s Wednesday press conference.

The biggest question will be is to see how Sean Locklear reacts to practicing for the first time since suffering a high ankle sprain.  He’ll be limited in practice, but he will be out there.

“I need to see him function at a high level by Friday. We’ll work him into it rather slowly. Today he’ll be individual stuff, installation stuff, maybe get him a few snaps here or there.  Ramp it up tomorrow, ramp it up on Friday. It will be good to get him back on the field in a team environment then on the side.”

Mora said that if Locklear is able to go, he would likely play left tackle, and Damion McIntosh would go to the bench.

LB Will Herring won’t practice today. He had an injection (shoulder) and won’t practice today, but should be ready to go on Sunday. Today he’ll be individual stuff, installation stuff

WR Ben Obomanu “seems to be doing pretty well” and the strained oblique is responding to treatment and “there’s a good chance” he should be ready on Sunday.

CB Ken Lucas will be limited but will get some reps.

S Jordan Babineaux is a little banged up and will be limited.

QB Matt Hasselbeck, who was hit a plethora of times on Sunday, is a little stiff and sore will practice, but will be limited in some aspects.

Other than LB Will Herring, we’ll have everyone out there doing something other than Will Herring.

Mora addressed the player moves and even though he mentioned sending a message to his team, the three moves weren’t sending a message.

“These were football related moves,” Mora said.

He was asked specifically why he cut Edgerrin James now, and not earlier or later …

“In our attempt to get Louis Rankin some plays and a look and see if we can utilize the speed he has, see if he’s a legitimate possibility as a running in the NFL, you have to put someone down,” he said.

Rather than ask Edgerrin James and man of his stature in this league to be inactive and relegate to a position on the scout team during the week, I felt the honorable thing was to let him go.”

For all the things that Mora praised James about – professional, good in the locker room, hard worker at practice – the results just weren’t there. Edge didn’t produce on the field. He rushed for 125 yards on 46 carries and his longest run was 10 yards.

So what will Rankin’s roll be? That hasn’t been determined. He’s going to return kicks that’s for certain. While Rankin has very limited kick returning experience at least at the NFL level – six returns for 108 yards and a long of 23 yards for Oakland this season – Mora still thinks he can be effective there.

“It’s more of a hunch. I see his speed and I recognize his elusiveness when he’s running on  the scout team,” Mora said. “He looks like a guy with some open space that a kick off returner has can make some things happen.

Momentary interjection of my personal opinion: Is he talking about the same guy, who was cut by the Raiders, and the same guy I didn’t exactly see as a game changer when he played for the Huskies? Honestly, is this where the depth and talent level of the this team, particularly the running back position has fallen that they are getting this excited about Louis Rankin? Ok back to the press conference.

When asked about the running back rotation works and will either Rankin or Justin Forsett get the one series of snaps each half that James was getting, Mora was non-commital.

“That has not been decided yet,” he said. “I thought Julius Jones played his best game for us Sunday. I liked the way he hit the hole. I though he hit it with aggressiveness, broke some tackles. I thought his vision was good. If he’s running well, then he might continue to be the guy. So we haven’t decided that yet. But we want to see Louis get some touches.”

Mora said we will be seeing more of Nate Burleson at punt return. Forsett has had his issues in recent weeks, but Mora said it’s more of getting Burleson more opportunities to touch the ball (providing he doesn’t fumble it or drop it like last week).

“We think he has the potential to make game-changing plays as the punt returner,” Mora said.

Mora was asked to comment about the emotional outbursts of T.J. Houmandzadeh and Deion Branch, he said he talked to both and is “comfortable with where they are at.”

Would be making as big of a deal out of this stuff if the Hawks were 5-2 instead of 2-5, probably not. But when things are going wrong, this stuff get noticed and scrutinized a little more. It’s understandable. Mora of course just kind of labeled it as competitive behaviors.

“It’s frustration. I think they are both very competitive people. When you are dealing with 53 plays, there is  diverse personalities. What you are always striving for and what we’re striving for and trying to ingrain in this team is a sense of selflessness. Because I think that’s what the best teams have. We’re always searching for that. It’s never going to be perfect and it’s hard to get it perfect, especially when you are going through a rough patch. You certainly keep your eye on situations like that. Because if you ignore them it could lead to a critical error. But I also think it’s important that you don’t overreact to them. You monitor them, and we certainly do that.

“I know this about both of those men. They work hard. They compete. Tehy care about the team. When you pull out the comments and look at them on their own, sometimes they don’t look great, but when you look at everything they say, they are competitive guys that care about winning.”

UPDATES in progress

Leave a comment Comments → 28
  1. longco44 says:

    Howcome Damion McIntosh wouldn’t be able to be in on the right side?

  2. NickLicatasucks says:

    Mora does not impress me with his comments during the press conferences. I wish he would say less. Hopefully Rankin is able to do well returning kicks, but I’m not going to count on it. He’s faster than Forsett though, so one would think he’d get the ball back further.

    McIntosh- not to be moved. We all know than Locklear will be hurt again, so why bother moving him? Willis has been Hawks most consistent lineman this year. That is pathetic.

  3. Since we’re signing Rankin to the active roster, we could instead pluck a practice squad guy from anywhere in the league. Maybe this is just my personal bias, but I’m skeptical of signing anyone who was cut by the Raiders. Aren’t there better options out there and especially since our running game has been so miserable lately? If we could find a diamond in the rough at the rb position this season, it would give us a huge headstart on next year.

  4. Horse pucky. The reason Mora is tolerating Douchemanzadeh and Branch is because Douche was just signed by Ruskell and Branch has a shite contract (which they recognize but wont admit).

    Not that this shocks me…it’s how sports seem to work. But I think it sets a bad precident.

    What kind of statement would it have made if Mora called them out?

    Whoever gave the chicken salad analogy…amen. Hors**t that Mora thinks Branch was just being competetive…pft.

  5. What’s the over /under on how long it takes Locklear to sprain a hangnail and to be out for few more weeks? 4days/2 days?

    Nice work if you can get it sitting in trainer’s rooms.

  6. well, we’ll see how it plays out if Lock starts – but I kept an eye on McIntosh on a bunch of plays last week – and he did a good job of keeping Ware off of Hasselbeck. I know he was just picked up off the street and Lock is former starter, but i’m a little nervous about the switch.

    The James cut bugged me a bit for reasons already stated – but, ultimately, it’s really a non-issue on the field, he wasn’t getting much PT, and i’m happy to see his carries go to Forsett.

  7. variable575 says:

    “Nate Burleson will return more punts this week. He has been used sporadically in that spot this year. He will replace Justin Forsett as the primary returner.”

    ARE YOU KIDDING!?!?!?!? Putting your leading receiver(who has a bum knee) as primary punt returner………..desperation of the coaches will kill any talent we have in every possible way. Nate will be injured filling that capacity and then what……..”OOPS, we need a new receiver”.

    Accountability for players is all I hear from the coaches, i want to hear Paul Allen surprise everyone with a statement for the media that reads something like this……”We’ll be looking at the accountability/responsibility of our GM and head coach for another losing season”.

  8. variable575 says:

    maybe we picked up Chris chambers, because putting nate back there makes no sense.

  9. IBGoofy says:

    If Burleson is our best punt return option (and I believe he is), I say use him! We seem to have low expectations’ for special teams…. one play and they can turn a game upside down! This happens to be one of our more solid team positions for depth (for a change….)… We need to win this next game… Just think what happens if we don’t…. Everyone seems to be looking beyond this game… like it’s a cake walk… C’mon… At this point, what do we gain by holding anything back???

  10. Audible says:

    If we lose to Detroit at home this weekend, there’s going to be a firestorm on this blog. I think we’ll win, but I sure as hell wouldn’t bet my life on it.

  11. variable575 says:

    Burleson has more impact at WR were he makes catches that extent the offensive drive.

    One big play of him returning a punt for a TD doesn’t do as much as one might think, far less than what he provides as a receiver. Remember a browns game a few yrs ago? sure we need sparks were we can get them but not this way because it’s a huge breakdown if you lose nate to an injury from PR.

    I know some might come on saying a PR for a TD changes a lot, and sure it does, but don’t put your leading receiver back there who could have a blowout yr with matt at some point. Besides nate seems to have lost his edge returning punts since coming back, i haven’t seen anything that would say put him back there ad it’s a game changer. He never was a devin hester at PR.

  12. longco44 says:

    I will give everyone on this blog $50 if the Hawks lose to the Lions….

  13. Audible says:

    That’s very generous of you and especially so since we would need a lot of booze to ease the pain from that loss.

  14. torinaga says:

    Getting my name out there just in case. I think we will win on Sunday, but if we don’t I could use the extra scratch.

  15. I agree. It would get quite nasty on here if we lost at home to the Lions.

    Eric – your personal analysis of Rankin was funny as heck. And, yes, it is sad that that’s where we are at with our “talented” depth.

  16. The positives on losing to the Lions is that we’d have a legit chance of drafting Suh.

    Of coarse, there’s no way in hell I want to lose to the Lions at home.

  17. Audible says:

    Hey BobbyK,

    I really hate to be the bearer of bad news, but after last weekend, Suh is no longer Ruskell material:

    http://www.huskerextra.com/articles/2009/11/02/football/doc4aee03a2efb28256344859.txt

  18. Good thing Ruskell won’t be making the pick:)

    He has been a good guy throughout his college career though. Prior to that, it’s all been very positive. Not that I condone drinking/driving (I don’t) but it’s not like he was loaded, or even halfway close to the legal limit. I can guarantee that 95% of us of legal age have gone out and had 2-3 beers in a nite and driven home at a .035% limit… knowing full well that we are definitely under the legal limit (maybe he could council Lofa on waiting until you’re not loaded anymore before driving anywhere).

  19. Audible says:

    Sure, but he almost ran over a poor little kitty. That would move him up on my board, though (no sweetheart, I’m just kidding around:).

  20. bird_spit says:

    If we loose to the Lions, then TR is gone..no doubt. I can see Peterson pointing to his back now. By the way, JP will be all over this game.

  21. IBGoofy says:

    BobbyK: “Good thing Ruskell won’t be making the pick:)”

    Good one Bobby! …. Good one!!! LOL!!

  22. longco44 says:

    Well, the least I could do is offer up everyone a few good drinks if the Hawks lose to the Lions!! Shoot, I suppose we should also be wondering about the game in St. Louis too…

  23. Uh, BobbyK, that was my analysis of Rankin … though Eric tends to agree with me…. His comment to me “I remember a lot of East-West running and dancing in the hole when he was at UW.”

  24. torinaga says:

    If it makes you feel better Ryan, I had assumed that Eric wrote this post until I got to that line. I knew that wouldn’t have come out of Eric.

    (we lazy readers don’t read bylines)

  25. I’m not afraid to inject some personal opinion or a fair amount of sarcasm into a post.

  26. torinaga says:

    I certainly appreciate that.

  27. IBGoofy says:

    LOL!!! … Ryan… all one needs to do is tune into the game chat and they’d quickly see no fear!!! You’ve made that very entertaining and open… great job!

  28. Okay… gotcha… good one, Ryan…

*
We welcome comments. Please keep them civil, short and to the point. ALL CAPS, spam, obscene, profane, abusive and off topic comments will be deleted. Repeat offenders will be blocked. Thanks for taking part and abiding by these simple rules.

JavaScript is required to post comments.

Follow the comments on this post with RSS 2.0