<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Friday practice report: Hawks ready for Cowboys</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.thenewstribune.com/seahawks/2009/10/30/friday-practice-report-hawks-ready-for-cowboys/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.thenewstribune.com/seahawks/2009/10/30/friday-practice-report-hawks-ready-for-cowboys/</link>
	<description>Where there is no off season</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 21:28:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: costamjest</title>
		<link>http://blog.thenewstribune.com/seahawks/2009/10/30/friday-practice-report-hawks-ready-for-cowboys/#comment-260337</link>
		<dc:creator>costamjest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2011 21:13:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.thenewstribune.com/seahawks/?p=1083#comment-260337</guid>
		<description>Usually I do not read post on blogs, but I would like to say that this write-up very forced me to try and do so! Your writing style has been surprised me. Thanks, quite nice article.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Usually I do not read post on blogs, but I would like to say that this write-up very forced me to try and do so! Your writing style has been surprised me. Thanks, quite nice article.
<div class="textalignright">
				<span id="reportcomment_results_div_260337" class="comments_report_span"><br />
					<a class="comments_report_anchor" href="" title="Report this comment" rel="nofollow">× <span>Flag comment</span></a><br />
				</span><br />
				<span id="reportcomment_comment_div_260337"></span>
			</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dukeshire</title>
		<link>http://blog.thenewstribune.com/seahawks/2009/10/30/friday-practice-report-hawks-ready-for-cowboys/#comment-7256</link>
		<dc:creator>Dukeshire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 16:49:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.thenewstribune.com/seahawks/?p=1083#comment-7256</guid>
		<description>What&#039;s not clear was the point you were trying to make.  Arguing that you need to be strong on the line (either offense or defense) is a bit like arguing the sun will rise in the east.  No s**t.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#8217;s not clear was the point you were trying to make.  Arguing that you need to be strong on the line (either offense or defense) is a bit like arguing the sun will rise in the east.  No s**t.
<div class="textalignright">
				<span id="reportcomment_results_div_7256" class="comments_report_span"><br />
					<a class="comments_report_anchor" href="" title="Report this comment" rel="nofollow">× <span>Flag comment</span></a><br />
				</span><br />
				<span id="reportcomment_comment_div_7256"></span>
			</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BobbyK</title>
		<link>http://blog.thenewstribune.com/seahawks/2009/10/30/friday-practice-report-hawks-ready-for-cowboys/#comment-7233</link>
		<dc:creator>BobbyK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 07:20:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.thenewstribune.com/seahawks/?p=1083#comment-7233</guid>
		<description>I wonder what&#039;s going to happen today?  We&#039;re going to &quot;upset&quot; the Cowboys?  We&#039;re going to get slaughtered?  At least we don&#039;t have to wait too much longer to find out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder what&#8217;s going to happen today?  We&#8217;re going to &#8220;upset&#8221; the Cowboys?  We&#8217;re going to get slaughtered?  At least we don&#8217;t have to wait too much longer to find out.
<div class="textalignright">
				<span id="reportcomment_results_div_7233" class="comments_report_span"><br />
					<a class="comments_report_anchor" href="" title="Report this comment" rel="nofollow">× <span>Flag comment</span></a><br />
				</span><br />
				<span id="reportcomment_comment_div_7233"></span>
			</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BobbyK</title>
		<link>http://blog.thenewstribune.com/seahawks/2009/10/30/friday-practice-report-hawks-ready-for-cowboys/#comment-7231</link>
		<dc:creator>BobbyK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 05:57:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.thenewstribune.com/seahawks/?p=1083#comment-7231</guid>
		<description>One writer writes that most SB winners the last 10 years didn&#039;t have very good OLs.  My analogy was to dispute that you DO need a good OL.  But most SB winners are USUALLY pretty good all around. 

USUALLY 

Not sure what part is isn&#039;t understood?  Every team in the history of mankind has had strengths/weaknesses... but the champions normally have more strengths than weaknesses and the weaknesses usually don&#039;t suck that bad (but some do).  And, no, I&#039;m not going to define &quot;suck.&quot;  

All I know is that I&#039;d rather have a good OL than a good group of LBs, DBs, WRs, etc.  I&#039;m not going to do the reseach to dispute, in the last 10 years, who had good units of this or that of the teams who have won SBs.      

Ahh, f-it... lets just get slaughtered tomorrow and draft some DBs and LBs next April.  That would be fun.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One writer writes that most SB winners the last 10 years didn&#8217;t have very good OLs.  My analogy was to dispute that you DO need a good OL.  But most SB winners are USUALLY pretty good all around. </p>
<p>USUALLY </p>
<p>Not sure what part is isn&#8217;t understood?  Every team in the history of mankind has had strengths/weaknesses&#8230; but the champions normally have more strengths than weaknesses and the weaknesses usually don&#8217;t suck that bad (but some do).  And, no, I&#8217;m not going to define &#8220;suck.&#8221;  </p>
<p>All I know is that I&#8217;d rather have a good OL than a good group of LBs, DBs, WRs, etc.  I&#8217;m not going to do the reseach to dispute, in the last 10 years, who had good units of this or that of the teams who have won SBs.      </p>
<p>Ahh, f-it&#8230; lets just get slaughtered tomorrow and draft some DBs and LBs next April.  That would be fun.
<div class="textalignright">
				<span id="reportcomment_results_div_7231" class="comments_report_span"><br />
					<a class="comments_report_anchor" href="" title="Report this comment" rel="nofollow">× <span>Flag comment</span></a><br />
				</span><br />
				<span id="reportcomment_comment_div_7231"></span>
			</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: princeaden</title>
		<link>http://blog.thenewstribune.com/seahawks/2009/10/30/friday-practice-report-hawks-ready-for-cowboys/#comment-7228</link>
		<dc:creator>princeaden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 04:06:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.thenewstribune.com/seahawks/?p=1083#comment-7228</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m hoping with all this talk about the o-line, the line we are going with tomorrow comes with some attitude. Maybe DMac brings some Nasty and it will rub off on Sims and Spencer and co. (for the record, Willis already has plenty of Nasty) and we can suprise some people. If they can knock the Cowboys off the ball a little and have a little running room, it will open the seams for the receivers and Matt and the offense could enjoy some success. Of course, the Defense will need to play with some serious enthusiasm. A couple TO&#039;s and a bounce or two our way and this could be a turning point. We&#039;re as healthy as we&#039;ll probably be all year(Locklear not withstanding) so there&#039;s no better time than now to start turning this around. Kool-Aid............ Anyone???????????</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m hoping with all this talk about the o-line, the line we are going with tomorrow comes with some attitude. Maybe DMac brings some Nasty and it will rub off on Sims and Spencer and co. (for the record, Willis already has plenty of Nasty) and we can suprise some people. If they can knock the Cowboys off the ball a little and have a little running room, it will open the seams for the receivers and Matt and the offense could enjoy some success. Of course, the Defense will need to play with some serious enthusiasm. A couple TO&#8217;s and a bounce or two our way and this could be a turning point. We&#8217;re as healthy as we&#8217;ll probably be all year(Locklear not withstanding) so there&#8217;s no better time than now to start turning this around. Kool-Aid&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230; Anyone???????????
<div class="textalignright">
				<span id="reportcomment_results_div_7228" class="comments_report_span"><br />
					<a class="comments_report_anchor" href="" title="Report this comment" rel="nofollow">× <span>Flag comment</span></a><br />
				</span><br />
				<span id="reportcomment_comment_div_7228"></span>
			</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: oceanic</title>
		<link>http://blog.thenewstribune.com/seahawks/2009/10/30/friday-practice-report-hawks-ready-for-cowboys/#comment-7226</link>
		<dc:creator>oceanic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 01:08:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.thenewstribune.com/seahawks/?p=1083#comment-7226</guid>
		<description>I really hate the zone blocking system.  I would rather the Hawks bring in bigger, drive blocking O linemen and have them take tighter splits.

OT  Trent Williams, Kyle Calloway,  Bryan Bulaga

OG  kMike Lupati, Jon Asamoah, Mitch Petrus

center  JD Walton, Ted Larsen</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really hate the zone blocking system.  I would rather the Hawks bring in bigger, drive blocking O linemen and have them take tighter splits.</p>
<p>OT  Trent Williams, Kyle Calloway,  Bryan Bulaga</p>
<p>OG  kMike Lupati, Jon Asamoah, Mitch Petrus</p>
<p>center  JD Walton, Ted Larsen
<div class="textalignright">
				<span id="reportcomment_results_div_7226" class="comments_report_span"><br />
					<a class="comments_report_anchor" href="" title="Report this comment" rel="nofollow">× <span>Flag comment</span></a><br />
				</span><br />
				<span id="reportcomment_comment_div_7226"></span>
			</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nightwulf</title>
		<link>http://blog.thenewstribune.com/seahawks/2009/10/30/friday-practice-report-hawks-ready-for-cowboys/#comment-7220</link>
		<dc:creator>nightwulf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 21:57:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.thenewstribune.com/seahawks/?p=1083#comment-7220</guid>
		<description>Bobby, I don&#039;t think we need much in the way of &quot;building&quot;...The D is pretty much there, (we&#039;ll always be a piece or two away from perfection) The Receiving corps is there, the QB is there, the backfield is an unknown...the only place where we need a lot of work is the O line...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bobby, I don&#8217;t think we need much in the way of &#8220;building&#8221;&#8230;The D is pretty much there, (we&#8217;ll always be a piece or two away from perfection) The Receiving corps is there, the QB is there, the backfield is an unknown&#8230;the only place where we need a lot of work is the O line&#8230;
<div class="textalignright">
				<span id="reportcomment_results_div_7220" class="comments_report_span"><br />
					<a class="comments_report_anchor" href="" title="Report this comment" rel="nofollow">× <span>Flag comment</span></a><br />
				</span><br />
				<span id="reportcomment_comment_div_7220"></span>
			</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dukeshire</title>
		<link>http://blog.thenewstribune.com/seahawks/2009/10/30/friday-practice-report-hawks-ready-for-cowboys/#comment-7219</link>
		<dc:creator>Dukeshire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 21:14:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.thenewstribune.com/seahawks/?p=1083#comment-7219</guid>
		<description>&quot;Super Bowl winners are good top-to-bottom or else they wouldn&#039;t have made it that far. They are usually good at all positions.&quot;  That is in direct conflict with your Super Bowl champions o-line break down above.  And speaks to my points earlier in reference to that list.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Super Bowl winners are good top-to-bottom or else they wouldn&#8217;t have made it that far. They are usually good at all positions.&#8221;  That is in direct conflict with your Super Bowl champions o-line break down above.  And speaks to my points earlier in reference to that list.
<div class="textalignright">
				<span id="reportcomment_results_div_7219" class="comments_report_span"><br />
					<a class="comments_report_anchor" href="" title="Report this comment" rel="nofollow">× <span>Flag comment</span></a><br />
				</span><br />
				<span id="reportcomment_comment_div_7219"></span>
			</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BobbyK</title>
		<link>http://blog.thenewstribune.com/seahawks/2009/10/30/friday-practice-report-hawks-ready-for-cowboys/#comment-7214</link>
		<dc:creator>BobbyK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 19:36:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.thenewstribune.com/seahawks/?p=1083#comment-7214</guid>
		<description>The Raiders come to mind with Upshaw and Shell on their left side.  

Super Bowl winners are good top-to-bottom or else they wouldn&#039;t have made it that far.  They are usually good at all positions.  

We all have different philosophies on how we would build a winner.  Mine is franchise QB and good OL.  From there, I&#039;d mix and match with trying to be good all over but realizing it can&#039;t always happen.  I just don&#039;t think you can skimp.

No matter how hard we try, we&#039;ll never have a left side better than Walt/Hutch, but that doesn&#039;t mean we can&#039;t get good players.  And we certainly can improve from the right side of what we had in &#039;05.  And the natives are going to come out in full force with their hatchets on this one, but Robbie wasn&#039;t a &quot;real&quot; Pro Bowler all by himself in &#039;05.  He was an above average C who played on a team who had a runner with great stats and road the coattails of Walt/Hutch and Shaun&#039;s numbers to the Pro Bowl.  He was a fine player and I&#039;m glad he was on our side (the continuity was huge b/w our linemen) but if he would have played the exact same way that year for a 5-11 team, there&#039;s no way he would have sniffed the Pro Bowl.  Kind of like Tez in the 90s.  That guy was the best for a period of time but he never got talked about like he would have if:  A. He played in New York or:  B. The Seahawks would have won.  And I&#039;m used to people taking what I say and using it in a way that I didn&#039;t mean, so I&#039;ll wait for the &quot;I can&#039;t believe you think Robbie sucked&quot; comments and know there&#039;s no way in hell I thought he was a bad player.  

I&#039;ve been watching the Iowa game to see Bryan Bulaga and he looked fine (so did their RT).  I&#039;d love to have him at LT in &#039;10.  I only saw it on commercials of the Nebraska game though so it&#039;s not like I watched his every snap.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Raiders come to mind with Upshaw and Shell on their left side.  </p>
<p>Super Bowl winners are good top-to-bottom or else they wouldn&#8217;t have made it that far.  They are usually good at all positions.  </p>
<p>We all have different philosophies on how we would build a winner.  Mine is franchise QB and good OL.  From there, I&#8217;d mix and match with trying to be good all over but realizing it can&#8217;t always happen.  I just don&#8217;t think you can skimp.</p>
<p>No matter how hard we try, we&#8217;ll never have a left side better than Walt/Hutch, but that doesn&#8217;t mean we can&#8217;t get good players.  And we certainly can improve from the right side of what we had in &#8217;05.  And the natives are going to come out in full force with their hatchets on this one, but Robbie wasn&#8217;t a &#8220;real&#8221; Pro Bowler all by himself in &#8217;05.  He was an above average C who played on a team who had a runner with great stats and road the coattails of Walt/Hutch and Shaun&#8217;s numbers to the Pro Bowl.  He was a fine player and I&#8217;m glad he was on our side (the continuity was huge b/w our linemen) but if he would have played the exact same way that year for a 5-11 team, there&#8217;s no way he would have sniffed the Pro Bowl.  Kind of like Tez in the 90s.  That guy was the best for a period of time but he never got talked about like he would have if:  A. He played in New York or:  B. The Seahawks would have won.  And I&#8217;m used to people taking what I say and using it in a way that I didn&#8217;t mean, so I&#8217;ll wait for the &#8220;I can&#8217;t believe you think Robbie sucked&#8221; comments and know there&#8217;s no way in hell I thought he was a bad player.  </p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been watching the Iowa game to see Bryan Bulaga and he looked fine (so did their RT).  I&#8217;d love to have him at LT in &#8217;10.  I only saw it on commercials of the Nebraska game though so it&#8217;s not like I watched his every snap.
<div class="textalignright">
				<span id="reportcomment_results_div_7214" class="comments_report_span"><br />
					<a class="comments_report_anchor" href="" title="Report this comment" rel="nofollow">× <span>Flag comment</span></a><br />
				</span><br />
				<span id="reportcomment_comment_div_7214"></span>
			</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stevos</title>
		<link>http://blog.thenewstribune.com/seahawks/2009/10/30/friday-practice-report-hawks-ready-for-cowboys/#comment-7213</link>
		<dc:creator>Stevos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 19:16:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.thenewstribune.com/seahawks/?p=1083#comment-7213</guid>
		<description>and the only way to judge the team Ruskell built is comparing it to the team we had in 2004.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>and the only way to judge the team Ruskell built is comparing it to the team we had in 2004.
<div class="textalignright">
				<span id="reportcomment_results_div_7213" class="comments_report_span"><br />
					<a class="comments_report_anchor" href="" title="Report this comment" rel="nofollow">× <span>Flag comment</span></a><br />
				</span><br />
				<span id="reportcomment_comment_div_7213"></span>
			</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

