<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Projected Seahawks final 53-man roster</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.thenewstribune.com/seahawks/2009/09/01/projected-seahawks-final-53-man-roster/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.thenewstribune.com/seahawks/2009/09/01/projected-seahawks-final-53-man-roster/</link>
	<description>Where there is no off season</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 20:55:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: BobbyK</title>
		<link>http://blog.thenewstribune.com/seahawks/2009/09/01/projected-seahawks-final-53-man-roster/#comment-1901</link>
		<dc:creator>BobbyK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 21:31:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.thenewstribune.com/seahawks/?p=393#comment-1901</guid>
		<description>Yeah, I think some people here expect him to be a 15-20 sack guy.  I don&#039;t expect that, but I do think there&#039;s hope for him to eventually be a situational pass rusher who is capable of 8-9 sacks per season.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, I think some people here expect him to be a 15-20 sack guy.  I don&#8217;t expect that, but I do think there&#8217;s hope for him to eventually be a situational pass rusher who is capable of 8-9 sacks per season.
<div class="textalignright">
				<span id="reportcomment_results_div_1901" class="comments_report_span"><br />
					<a class="comments_report_anchor" href="" title="Report this comment" rel="nofollow">× <span>Flag comment</span></a><br />
				</span><br />
				<span id="reportcomment_comment_div_1901"></span>
			</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Palerydr</title>
		<link>http://blog.thenewstribune.com/seahawks/2009/09/01/projected-seahawks-final-53-man-roster/#comment-1888</link>
		<dc:creator>Palerydr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 18:21:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.thenewstribune.com/seahawks/?p=393#comment-1888</guid>
		<description>point taken I also like football players over posers I hope Reed turns out to be the guy everybody wants him to be which I believe would also include Mr .Reed himself. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>point taken I also like football players over posers I hope Reed turns out to be the guy everybody wants him to be which I believe would also include Mr .Reed himself. <img src='http://blog.thenewstribune.com/seahawks/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />
<div class="textalignright">
				<span id="reportcomment_results_div_1888" class="comments_report_span"><br />
					<a class="comments_report_anchor" href="" title="Report this comment" rel="nofollow">× <span>Flag comment</span></a><br />
				</span><br />
				<span id="reportcomment_comment_div_1888"></span>
			</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BobbyK</title>
		<link>http://blog.thenewstribune.com/seahawks/2009/09/01/projected-seahawks-final-53-man-roster/#comment-1887</link>
		<dc:creator>BobbyK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 17:54:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.thenewstribune.com/seahawks/?p=393#comment-1887</guid>
		<description>He&#039;s not an every down player.  He&#039;s situational (like Reed).  

Chuck Darby is/was good for us in &#039;05.  He was too small and slow as well.  Manuel, our secondary glue that year, was also too slow.  I&#039;ll take a good football player over a talented and roided Tony Mandarich any day.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He&#8217;s not an every down player.  He&#8217;s situational (like Reed).  </p>
<p>Chuck Darby is/was good for us in &#8217;05.  He was too small and slow as well.  Manuel, our secondary glue that year, was also too slow.  I&#8217;ll take a good football player over a talented and roided Tony Mandarich any day.
<div class="textalignright">
				<span id="reportcomment_results_div_1887" class="comments_report_span"><br />
					<a class="comments_report_anchor" href="" title="Report this comment" rel="nofollow">× <span>Flag comment</span></a><br />
				</span><br />
				<span id="reportcomment_comment_div_1887"></span>
			</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Palerydr</title>
		<link>http://blog.thenewstribune.com/seahawks/2009/09/01/projected-seahawks-final-53-man-roster/#comment-1879</link>
		<dc:creator>Palerydr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 15:45:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.thenewstribune.com/seahawks/?p=393#comment-1879</guid>
		<description>Hey Bobby I&#039;m not against keeping Reed and Dumervill(roughly 15 lbs heavier than Reed) and Harrison are exceptional EXCEPTIONS to the rules of size in the NFL I don&#039;t know if Dumervill plays every down I doubt it and Harrison is a line backer he has the lateral quickness to play the position(LB) that Reed lacks so it&#039;s really not a good comparison.  So again I say don&#039;t get so geeked up about a guy who has a limited skill set when you have needs in other areas of the team. (OL) put him on waivers and you&#039;ll see teams pass on him. Sign him to PS and bring him in if you get an injury. Also if he is claimed by another team he has to make the final roster not likely. Lastly if he is on the PS ANY team can sign him so don&#039;t think they won&#039;t be thinking along those lines and keeping their own nuggets.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Bobby I&#8217;m not against keeping Reed and Dumervill(roughly 15 lbs heavier than Reed) and Harrison are exceptional EXCEPTIONS to the rules of size in the NFL I don&#8217;t know if Dumervill plays every down I doubt it and Harrison is a line backer he has the lateral quickness to play the position(LB) that Reed lacks so it&#8217;s really not a good comparison.  So again I say don&#8217;t get so geeked up about a guy who has a limited skill set when you have needs in other areas of the team. (OL) put him on waivers and you&#8217;ll see teams pass on him. Sign him to PS and bring him in if you get an injury. Also if he is claimed by another team he has to make the final roster not likely. Lastly if he is on the PS ANY team can sign him so don&#8217;t think they won&#8217;t be thinking along those lines and keeping their own nuggets.
<div class="textalignright">
				<span id="reportcomment_results_div_1879" class="comments_report_span"><br />
					<a class="comments_report_anchor" href="" title="Report this comment" rel="nofollow">× <span>Flag comment</span></a><br />
				</span><br />
				<span id="reportcomment_comment_div_1879"></span>
			</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: earther</title>
		<link>http://blog.thenewstribune.com/seahawks/2009/09/01/projected-seahawks-final-53-man-roster/#comment-1861</link>
		<dc:creator>earther</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 07:06:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.thenewstribune.com/seahawks/?p=393#comment-1861</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;RedHawk66:&lt;/b&gt; &quot;&lt;i&gt;Reed has done well in the OTA’s, he has done well in camp and he has excelled in the preseason. He gives his all and he motivates those around him. What more can you ask of a rookie? &lt;/i&gt;&quot;

Nothing. That&#039;s exactly what you want to see in a rookie. He&#039;s demonstrated that he has a great motor and an excellent work ethic. Those are the kind of guys you want on your football team even if they&#039;ll never aspire to be much more than special teams players and rotational subs. 

You kind of have to temper your expectations though. So far he&#039;s demonstrated very early in his rookie season that he has potential. There&#039;s not a lot else you can really say about the guy at this point. I don&#039;t think he&#039;ll clear waivers because potential is good and other teams who have building to do along their front seven are going to notice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>RedHawk66:</b> &#8220;<i>Reed has done well in the OTA’s, he has done well in camp and he has excelled in the preseason. He gives his all and he motivates those around him. What more can you ask of a rookie? </i>&#8221;</p>
<p>Nothing. That&#8217;s exactly what you want to see in a rookie. He&#8217;s demonstrated that he has a great motor and an excellent work ethic. Those are the kind of guys you want on your football team even if they&#8217;ll never aspire to be much more than special teams players and rotational subs. </p>
<p>You kind of have to temper your expectations though. So far he&#8217;s demonstrated very early in his rookie season that he has potential. There&#8217;s not a lot else you can really say about the guy at this point. I don&#8217;t think he&#8217;ll clear waivers because potential is good and other teams who have building to do along their front seven are going to notice.
<div class="textalignright">
				<span id="reportcomment_results_div_1861" class="comments_report_span"><br />
					<a class="comments_report_anchor" href="" title="Report this comment" rel="nofollow">× <span>Flag comment</span></a><br />
				</span><br />
				<span id="reportcomment_comment_div_1861"></span>
			</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: freedom_X</title>
		<link>http://blog.thenewstribune.com/seahawks/2009/09/01/projected-seahawks-final-53-man-roster/#comment-1860</link>
		<dc:creator>freedom_X</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 05:56:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.thenewstribune.com/seahawks/?p=393#comment-1860</guid>
		<description>Actually I&#039;ll backtrack a bit on my Nick Reed comment. I don&#039;t know what the coaches think of his overall play. If they think he&#039;s got a decent all around game, he probably makes the squad even if special teams is so-so. But good special teams would seal his place on the 53 man roster.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually I&#8217;ll backtrack a bit on my Nick Reed comment. I don&#8217;t know what the coaches think of his overall play. If they think he&#8217;s got a decent all around game, he probably makes the squad even if special teams is so-so. But good special teams would seal his place on the 53 man roster.
<div class="textalignright">
				<span id="reportcomment_results_div_1860" class="comments_report_span"><br />
					<a class="comments_report_anchor" href="" title="Report this comment" rel="nofollow">× <span>Flag comment</span></a><br />
				</span><br />
				<span id="reportcomment_comment_div_1860"></span>
			</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: freedom_X</title>
		<link>http://blog.thenewstribune.com/seahawks/2009/09/01/projected-seahawks-final-53-man-roster/#comment-1859</link>
		<dc:creator>freedom_X</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 05:54:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.thenewstribune.com/seahawks/?p=393#comment-1859</guid>
		<description>Once again, last year it was Jason Babin who was getting a sack or more every game, and couldn&#039;t understand why Seattle kept Atkins over Babin. The exact same complaining people have now concerning Reed vs. Jackson.

The relative level of competition has been beaten to death - so what if the 3rd stringer is a 10 year vet. He&#039;s still 3rd string, which means the 1st string guy is that much better.

2nd, there&#039;s more to DE play than just rushing the passer. Even a guy whose only job is to rush the passer has to have some ability to read the play and defend the run/play action/screen, etc. Last year, Babin got the sacks but didn&#039;t hold his ground that well and wasn&#039;t much against the run. 

I love Reed&#039;s tenacity and endless motion to get free on the pass rush, but he takes himself out of the play too a lot. A lot of productive college pass rushers wash out of the league because all they can do is get a sack, at the cost of blowing up a big hole in the defense when they take themselves out of their assignment trying to get to the QB.

BTW Babin has done nothing since Seattle cut him, and regarding all these fan preseason favorites, I&#039;ve never seen any comments from actual professional football observers that the Seahawks are cutting great players in order to save face. Only fan fiction on that. 

Last year, everyone was mewling about Justin Forsett getting cut. The Colts did claim him because they suffered tons on injuries to their backs and return men. But they ended up releasing him in October, which is why he&#039;s back with Seattle now. For all the Forsett fan love, he wasn&#039;t that huge a talent. 

I repeat - if Nick Reed is playing well on special teams, he&#039;s on the team. If he can play as the 7th LB, he&#039;s on team. If Nick Reed can&#039;t, he&#039;s on the waiver wire. 

Some of you remind me of Steve Kelley writing in the Seattle times 15 years ago or so. Seattle had FA QB Sean Salisbury, who always lit it up in preseason. Seattle finally cut him, and Kelley wrote a piece on how Seattle just cut the QB that could get them to the Super Bowl, and that they&#039;d eternally regret it. Sound familiar?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Once again, last year it was Jason Babin who was getting a sack or more every game, and couldn&#8217;t understand why Seattle kept Atkins over Babin. The exact same complaining people have now concerning Reed vs. Jackson.</p>
<p>The relative level of competition has been beaten to death &#8211; so what if the 3rd stringer is a 10 year vet. He&#8217;s still 3rd string, which means the 1st string guy is that much better.</p>
<p>2nd, there&#8217;s more to DE play than just rushing the passer. Even a guy whose only job is to rush the passer has to have some ability to read the play and defend the run/play action/screen, etc. Last year, Babin got the sacks but didn&#8217;t hold his ground that well and wasn&#8217;t much against the run. </p>
<p>I love Reed&#8217;s tenacity and endless motion to get free on the pass rush, but he takes himself out of the play too a lot. A lot of productive college pass rushers wash out of the league because all they can do is get a sack, at the cost of blowing up a big hole in the defense when they take themselves out of their assignment trying to get to the QB.</p>
<p>BTW Babin has done nothing since Seattle cut him, and regarding all these fan preseason favorites, I&#8217;ve never seen any comments from actual professional football observers that the Seahawks are cutting great players in order to save face. Only fan fiction on that. </p>
<p>Last year, everyone was mewling about Justin Forsett getting cut. The Colts did claim him because they suffered tons on injuries to their backs and return men. But they ended up releasing him in October, which is why he&#8217;s back with Seattle now. For all the Forsett fan love, he wasn&#8217;t that huge a talent. </p>
<p>I repeat &#8211; if Nick Reed is playing well on special teams, he&#8217;s on the team. If he can play as the 7th LB, he&#8217;s on team. If Nick Reed can&#8217;t, he&#8217;s on the waiver wire. </p>
<p>Some of you remind me of Steve Kelley writing in the Seattle times 15 years ago or so. Seattle had FA QB Sean Salisbury, who always lit it up in preseason. Seattle finally cut him, and Kelley wrote a piece on how Seattle just cut the QB that could get them to the Super Bowl, and that they&#8217;d eternally regret it. Sound familiar?
<div class="textalignright">
				<span id="reportcomment_results_div_1859" class="comments_report_span"><br />
					<a class="comments_report_anchor" href="" title="Report this comment" rel="nofollow">× <span>Flag comment</span></a><br />
				</span><br />
				<span id="reportcomment_comment_div_1859"></span>
			</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: klm008</title>
		<link>http://blog.thenewstribune.com/seahawks/2009/09/01/projected-seahawks-final-53-man-roster/#comment-1855</link>
		<dc:creator>klm008</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 04:41:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.thenewstribune.com/seahawks/?p=393#comment-1855</guid>
		<description>Both Reed and Bennett are outplaying LoJac and Atkins.  They might keep 11 DL and keep everybody, which might be the best way to keep Hawks secondary from chasing opposing WRs into the end zone.   Reed can also double as an OLB, he has coverage skills as well as run-stopping skills.  Hawks have an embarrassment of riches at both DL &amp; LB.

Too much dead cap to cut Branch.  Maybe Branch plays the whole season this year?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Both Reed and Bennett are outplaying LoJac and Atkins.  They might keep 11 DL and keep everybody, which might be the best way to keep Hawks secondary from chasing opposing WRs into the end zone.   Reed can also double as an OLB, he has coverage skills as well as run-stopping skills.  Hawks have an embarrassment of riches at both DL &amp; LB.</p>
<p>Too much dead cap to cut Branch.  Maybe Branch plays the whole season this year?
<div class="textalignright">
				<span id="reportcomment_results_div_1855" class="comments_report_span"><br />
					<a class="comments_report_anchor" href="" title="Report this comment" rel="nofollow">× <span>Flag comment</span></a><br />
				</span><br />
				<span id="reportcomment_comment_div_1855"></span>
			</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RedHawk66</title>
		<link>http://blog.thenewstribune.com/seahawks/2009/09/01/projected-seahawks-final-53-man-roster/#comment-1854</link>
		<dc:creator>RedHawk66</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 04:26:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.thenewstribune.com/seahawks/?p=393#comment-1854</guid>
		<description>Reed has done well in the OTA’s, he has done well in camp and he has excelled in the preseason.  He gives his all and he motivates those around him.  What more can you ask of a rookie?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reed has done well in the OTA’s, he has done well in camp and he has excelled in the preseason.  He gives his all and he motivates those around him.  What more can you ask of a rookie?
<div class="textalignright">
				<span id="reportcomment_results_div_1854" class="comments_report_span"><br />
					<a class="comments_report_anchor" href="" title="Report this comment" rel="nofollow">× <span>Flag comment</span></a><br />
				</span><br />
				<span id="reportcomment_comment_div_1854"></span>
			</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RedHawk66</title>
		<link>http://blog.thenewstribune.com/seahawks/2009/09/01/projected-seahawks-final-53-man-roster/#comment-1853</link>
		<dc:creator>RedHawk66</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 04:22:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.thenewstribune.com/seahawks/?p=393#comment-1853</guid>
		<description>If you cut Nick Reed, the next time you see him will be when he is dragging Matt Hasselbeck or Seneca Wallaceto the turf.  Those of you who are quick to write off his accomplishments this preseason should look back at the preseason stats from 2008.   Or look at the stats from the regular season.  No one came close to replicating what Reed has done so far this year.   It has been pointed out that he has only done well against the 3rd and 4th string OT&#039;s but Shelton of SD is a 10 year vet with over 120 NFL starts.  Furthermore, Bradley is already working with Reed as one of the middle linebackers in a 3-4, just watch last weeks game.  He is fast, he is quick and he has an amazing nose for the play.  Granted he will make mistakes but his hustle willl put him in the middle of a lot of plays.  I think it is a mistake to cut him because the NFL scouts didn&#039;t think he fit the prototype and because he wasn&#039;t invited to the combine.  If it happens, it is a mistake that Seahawk fans will come to regret.

Reed has done well in the OTA&#039;s, he has done well in</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you cut Nick Reed, the next time you see him will be when he is dragging Matt Hasselbeck or Seneca Wallaceto the turf.  Those of you who are quick to write off his accomplishments this preseason should look back at the preseason stats from 2008.   Or look at the stats from the regular season.  No one came close to replicating what Reed has done so far this year.   It has been pointed out that he has only done well against the 3rd and 4th string OT&#8217;s but Shelton of SD is a 10 year vet with over 120 NFL starts.  Furthermore, Bradley is already working with Reed as one of the middle linebackers in a 3-4, just watch last weeks game.  He is fast, he is quick and he has an amazing nose for the play.  Granted he will make mistakes but his hustle willl put him in the middle of a lot of plays.  I think it is a mistake to cut him because the NFL scouts didn&#8217;t think he fit the prototype and because he wasn&#8217;t invited to the combine.  If it happens, it is a mistake that Seahawk fans will come to regret.</p>
<p>Reed has done well in the OTA&#8217;s, he has done well in
<div class="textalignright">
				<span id="reportcomment_results_div_1853" class="comments_report_span"><br />
					<a class="comments_report_anchor" href="" title="Report this comment" rel="nofollow">× <span>Flag comment</span></a><br />
				</span><br />
				<span id="reportcomment_comment_div_1853"></span>
			</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

