Comments on: Official injury report http://blog.thenewstribune.com/seahawks/2007/10/31/official-injury-report-9/ Where there is no off season Mon, 20 May 2013 03:55:32 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1 By: PapaHawk http://blog.thenewstribune.com/seahawks/2007/10/31/official-injury-report-9/#comment-56353 PapaHawk Thu, 01 Nov 2007 22:22:10 +0000 http://blog.thenewstribune.com/seahawks/2007/10/31/official-injury-report-9/#comment-56353 Bobbyk03,

Holmgren said in his press conference yesterday that Branch was “50-50″. If he is being coy, then he would hold him out of at least one practice, maybe two. We’ll know if he’s playing by whether or not he practices today and tomorrow. Holmy doesn’t play guys who haven’t practiced on a month.


× Flag comment

]]> By: bobbyk03 http://blog.thenewstribune.com/seahawks/2007/10/31/official-injury-report-9/#comment-56352 bobbyk03 Thu, 01 Nov 2007 22:06:59 +0000 http://blog.thenewstribune.com/seahawks/2007/10/31/official-injury-report-9/#comment-56352 WTF – I thought Branch was good to go? Just being cautious?


× Flag comment

]]> By: luisc http://blog.thenewstribune.com/seahawks/2007/10/31/official-injury-report-9/#comment-56351 luisc Thu, 01 Nov 2007 16:58:57 +0000 http://blog.thenewstribune.com/seahawks/2007/10/31/official-injury-report-9/#comment-56351 Wasn’t Ted Washington put on injured reserve to make room for Colclough?


× Flag comment

]]>