The Prep Blog

The Prep Blog » WIAA » WIAA: Rep Assembly amendments revealed

The Prep Blog

Covering high school sports in Tacoma, Pierce County and the South Sound

WIAA: Rep Assembly amendments revealed

Post by Doug Pacey / The News Tribune on Feb. 2, 2012 at 12:14 pm with 2 Comments »
February 2, 2012 12:14 pm

The Washington Interscholastic Activities Association released the 2012 Rep Assembly amendments today.

Click here to view the amendments.

Only one of the 16 amendments piqued my interest. Amendment No. 1 deals with how schools are classified. Here’s how it reads:

DEMONSTRATION OF DECLINING ENROLLMENT – Schools in the 2B, 1A and 2A
classifications able to demonstrate (via the P223) that enrollment in their school district
for the next two-year classification cycle is below the cutoff point determined by the
classification process for both years will have the option to participate in the lower
classification. Movement by a school will not force another school into a higher
classification to replace the school with declining enrollment. Utilizing this procedure
would override 4.2.0 for the two classifications affected.

NOTE: All subsequent subsections of Article 4 would be renumbered.

Issues:
1. The current classification system does not address declining enrollment.

2. The current classification system counts two graduating classes that never participate
during the following two-year cycle.

3. Many schools have been forced to play in the higher classification or play an
independent schedule when they know that they will have fewer students in their
school during the upcoming cycle. For example, even though Medical Lake knew the
military base would be undergoing a reduction in force and that significantly fewer
students would be attending the school during the current cycle, its appeal to be
classified as a 1A school was denied since their P223 numbers indicated it was a 2A
school. At this date, Medical Lake High School has 416 students in grade ten through
twelve, almost 100 students below the 512 2A cutoff. The next smallest school in the
league has 535 students.

4. Safety is a prime concern when a school has declining enrolment and plays contests
against schools of much greater enrollment. Disparity is school size is a prime
concern particularly in football.

Pros:
1. This new rule would eliminate the appeal process which can be an expensive trip for
schools not located near the WIAA office.

2. This new rule would allow schools to participate in their actual classification based on
the number of students actually attending that school during the two-year cycle.

3. This provides a positive experience for kids to compete with other teams nearer their
size.

4. League stability would not be an issue because schools that played in the lower
classification would be committed to that classification for two years.

Cons for HS Amendment #1:
1. Scheduling would be an issue because schools that played in the lower classification
would be committed to that classification for two years.

2. Schools may not be divided equally into each classification. This amendment is not
written with the idea to push a school into a different classification if another school
chooses to implement the Declining Enrollment Rule. The current classification
system is not designed to balance the number of schools in each classification during
the second two-year cycle.

Proposed by Kettle Falls High School, Northwest Christian School-Colbert, Mary Walker High
School, Northport High School, Medical Lake High School, Cusick High School, and Odessa
High School.

Rep Assembly amendments will be voted on in the spring.

Leave a comment Comments → 2
  1. Sideshow_Bill says:

    I think the amendments having to do with use of football equipment out of season is far more critical than classification waivers. That would mean no contact during Spring football or Summer camps – instantly turning spring ball into plays on air and summer into nothing but 7-on-7 passing leagues. Not to mention shut down all the team camps that the universities use to fund their programs.

    I see the amendment was proposed by a group of Snohomish County north schools (Jackson, Everett, Cascade, Marysville Getchell, and Marysville Pilchuck). Not sure why this small cadre of schools is pushing for this?

  2. kc82byu says:

    In regards to the football amendments, when a school like Skyline can get 60 to 70 or more players to attend a football camp at 250 dollars each(Huskies and Ducks charge 400) and another school with a large percentage of its student enrollment on free and reduced lunch is unable to get 20 kids to the same camp, the question of a level playing field comes up. How do you level the field. For the most part as you look at the teams that continually win at the bigger school level, having a lot of money for their program has a major impact.

    It should be pointed out that the players can still go to the college camps and receive all the training they want but not with school equipment. Many colleges offer equipment for rental. I am sure that many Head Coaches would think that not having to push, pull or prod athletes to fundraise throughout the off season, while at the same time competing with other sports, might be a good thing.

    Lastly, why should High School coaches, because that is where the burden falls, spend large amounts of time away from their families to help fund college programs?

*
We welcome comments. Please keep them civil, short and to the point. ALL CAPS, spam, obscene, profane, abusive and off topic comments will be deleted. Repeat offenders will be blocked. Thanks for taking part and abiding by these simple rules.

JavaScript is required to post comments.

Follow the comments on this post with RSS 2.0