Political Buzz

Talking WA politics.

NOTICE: Political Buzz has moved.

With the launch of our new website, we've moved Political Buzz.
Visit the new section.

Tag: Paul Wagemann


Musical chairs continue in House races

Paul Wagemann is nothing if not flexible.

The Lakewood Republican announced he would challenge state Rep. Tami Green, then decided to run for Rep. Troy Kelley‘s seat instead when Kelley’s departure left it open. Now that Steve O’Ban has announced for Kelley’s seat, Wagemann has returned to his earlier plan of challenging Green, House Democrats’ floor leader.

It’s possible this won’t be the last of the musical chairs. There’s another Republican in the race against Green, Malcolm Russell, and it seemed like one of Russell’s main calculations in choosing his target was allowing Wagemann to have first pick.

Read more »


Paul Wagemann renews bid for Legislature

Republican Paul Wagemann survived a spirited primary in 2010 but couldn’t unseat Democratic state Rep. Tami Green. He’ll try again this year.

Wagemann, a Lakewood real-estate developer with a business and military background, filed his candidacy for the House months ago but made it official today. His announcement comes just two months after he won re-election to the Clover Park School Board.

It also comes days after the Redistricting Commission released reconfigured maps of political districts, including the 28th Legislative District represented by Green. The district stretching from west Tacoma through University Place and Lakewood to DuPont grew southeast to

Read more »


Political Smell Test: False claim that $3 billion in waste was ignored

Deficits in Olympia and Washington, D.C. pose monumental challenges to whoever is in charge next year. Politicians have ideas for how to reduce the deficits, but some of them don’t add up. This is the second claim I’m looking at.

WHAT CANDIDATES SAY: A number of Republican candidates for the Legislature are citing State Auditor Brian Sonntag, a Democrat, in making the case that the Democrat-controlled Legislature failed to curb waste in state government.

They say Sonntag identified more than $3 billion worth of potential savings to state government in his audits, only to have the Legislature ignore his proposals.

At a candidate forum last week, 28th District House candidate Steve O’Ban said:

Brian Sonntag, a Democrat who I support because he’s doing his job well, has come out with $3 billion of savings for our state government, efficiencies, redundancies, not just in the ferry system but across the board, and virtually none of those have been adopted by the Legislature, even though the Legislature’s controlled by his party.

At another candidate forum months ago, 26th District Senate candidate Marty McClendon said: “When we were facing a $2.6 billion deficit, no other options were on the table except for raising taxes … Brian Sonntag found $3.8 billion worth of waste. (That) was not addressed.”

It’s an attractive talking point because it gives candidates an answer when asked where they would cut, without having to name specific programs.

In interviews, 26th District House candidate Doug Richards and 28th District candidate Paul Wagemann have both cited Sonntag. Richards said a projected deficit of $4.5 billion could be mostly solved by cutting “$3.2 billion” in waste and inefficiencies found by Sonntag: “That’s three-quarters of the problem right there.” Wagemann said Sonntag has issued more than 700 recommendations in his audits: “Our Legislature has virtually ignored these recommendations.”

THE FACTS: You can see all of Sonntag’s performance audits here. Their benefits do indeed add up to nearly $4 billion, and Sonntag highlighted the total in a December 2009 report that looks at the status of 705 recommendations:

From February 2007 through June 30, 2009, performance audits identified nearly $3.6 billion in cost savings, unnecessary expenditures and economic benefits.

The key phrase there is “economic benefits.” By far the largest savings, $3 billion, comes from a report he issued on reducing congestion in Puget Sound. It’s the amount that would be saved over five years — in economic impact to drivers and businesses.

In other words, it’s not savings to government. The recommendations don’t help state legislators balance their budgets.

The $3.6 billion number isn’t being described correctly, Sonntag said in an interview. “That captures a whole lot more than just what could be saved in a current state budget,” he said.

Read more »