Political Buzz

Talking WA politics.

NOTICE: Political Buzz has moved.

With the launch of our new website, we've moved Political Buzz.
Visit the new section.

Is a U.S. Supreme Court showdown on Proposition 8 inevitable? Talking Points Memo says maybe not

Post by Peter Callaghan / The News Tribune on Feb. 8, 2012 at 8:45 am |
February 8, 2012 8:48 am

This piece by Jillian Rayfield in today’s Talking Points Memo takes a much different approach to the Tuesday decision that California’s Proposition 8 banning gay marriage is unconstitutional.

Convention wisdom is that the case will surely be appealed and that the court will make the final decision. Rayfield agrees that it will be appealed but quotes some court experts saying the U.S. Supreme Court justices might not agree to review the decision, mostly because they don’t have to.

The 9th Circuit ruling repeatedly stated that the ruling applied only to California. That is because California courts granted the right to marry to same-gender couples and then took it away.

“This unique and strictly limited effect of Proposition 8 allows us to address the amendment’s constitutionality on narrow grounds,” wrote Judge Stephen Reinhardt for the court’s 2-1 majority.

Rayfield wrote: “Several California law professors speculated to TPM that this “narrow” focus of the ruling could mean that the Supreme Court will decline to hear the case, since the ruling is so limited to California.”

*
The News Tribune now uses Facebook commenting on selected blogs. See editor's column for more details. Commenters are expected to abide by terms of service for Facebook as well as commenting rules for thenewstribune.com. Report violators to webmaster@thenewstribune.com.