Political Buzz

Talking WA politics.

NOTICE: Political Buzz has moved.

With the launch of our new website, we've moved Political Buzz.
Visit the new section.

House Democrats eyeing tax vote for spring ballot

Post by Jordan Schrader / The News Tribune on Sep. 9, 2011 at 9:49 am with 1 Comment »
September 9, 2011 10:55 am

As they wait for details of the revenue forecast, lawmakers are divided on whether to return to Olympia right away or hold off until January.

Opinions don’t divide along party lines.

Senate Democrats are eyeing the possibility of a November or December return, while Senate Republican leaders are lining up behind Sen. Joe Zarelli, who says more time is needed to figure out a plan that can pass bipartisan muster.

In the House, Democrats don’t agree with their Republican counterparts on much — certainly not on the budget that passed this winter with no GOP votes — but some leaders on both sides say time is of the essence.

House Democrats have a unique reason for haste: they may try to put a ballot measure in front of voters next spring. Their leaders are considering the idea of asking voters to stave off the deepest of the cuts by raising tax revenue.

Their leaders bounced around ideas for revenue at a meeting Wednesday, with potential targets ranging from the sales tax to tax exemptions like the ones banks receive for mortgage interest, Pierce County state Rep. Tami Green said.

It’s unlikely lawmakers could summon the supermajorities required to pass a tax increase unilaterally, so they would have to turn to voters. But even the simple majority it takes to include taxes in the equation is far from politically simple. The votes weren’t there this winter.

Green said another big drop in revenue might change that. She said this time it may be the other way around: House Democrats may not have the votes to reach a deal without new taxes.

The Senate’s majority Democrats met Thursday to talk about their options. Budget chairman Ed Murray said a deal might come together in time for a special session in November or December but probably not sooner. Murray said he wants new tax revenue as part of an agreement, but isn’t speaking for his caucus.

Leave a comment Comments → 1
  1. If lawmakers are going to send voters a proposed tax referendum they should also put a constitutional amendment enforcing the four-time voter approved 2/3 vote requirement for tax increases on the ballot (especially since some are already talking about suspending it again and others are suing to have it overturned). The legislative vote for both measures could be clearly framed as not an endorsement of the policies but instead an opportunity for the citizens to decide.

    Though not identical, this is similar to what lawmakers said they were doing in 2005 when they placed a constitutional amendment on the ballot to reduce the vote threshold needed for voter approved school levies. At the time several lawmakers said they didn’t necessarily support the policy but the voters should have the opportunity to be heard. This would provide voters the opportunity to weigh in on both proposals while finally putting to rest once and for all the debate about the 2/3 vote requirement.

We welcome comments. Please keep them civil, short and to the point. ALL CAPS, spam, obscene, profane, abusive and off topic comments will be deleted. Repeat offenders will be blocked. Thanks for taking part and abiding by these simple rules.

Follow the comments on this post with RSS 2.0