Political Buzz

Talking WA politics.

NOTICE: Political Buzz has moved.

With the launch of our new website, we've moved Political Buzz.
Visit the new section.

UPDATED: Tacoma council members’ personal evaluations shed more light on Anderson’s firing

Post by Lewis Kamb / The News Tribune on Aug. 10, 2011 at 5:59 am with 11 Comments »
August 10, 2011 3:05 pm

(UPDATE 11:41 a.m. )

If anything, they offer an unvarnished look into what individual council members’ really think about the job performance of former Tacoma City Manager Eric Anderson.


The performance evaluations of Anderson written by individual Tacoma City Council members — obtained this week by The News Tribune under the state’s public records law — mostly attach names to the criticisms and praise for Anderson, and provide insight into council members’ personal opinions about his overall performance.

Several of the opinions offered in the personal reviews are far more abrasive than those that ultimately appeared in the council’s official report card for Anderson made public last month.  Some of the criticisms didn’t appear in the report at all.

The official performance review — an anonymous, collaborative document essentially authored by all nine council members — represents a toned-down amalgamation of the individual evaluations. Mayor Marilyn Strickland served as the editor who pulled together the final document for the council, which unanimously adopted it later.

Still, even the subdued evaluation presented publicly last month provided more varied and harsher criticism of Anderson than ever before during his six year run as Tacoma’s chief administrator.  (We previously wrote about the review of Anderson’s work over the past year here.) It provided the basis for the council’s 6 to 2 vote to terminate Anderson’s employment with the city.

During the council’s consideration on whether to extend Anderson’s contract, those voting to oust him largely offered generalizations and platitudes, saying Anderson had served Tacoma well, but the city is heading in a new direction.

But some of their personal criticisms seem to tell a different story.

Some opinions seemingly de-emphasized in the final evaluation were strongly worded criticisms by Jake Fey, Ryan Mello and David Boe, all of whom generally described Anderson as having an overly controlling nature that left staff members afraid to speak out and other government agencies and private businesses and developers frustrated to work with the city.

Written evaluations from Boe, Victoria Woodards and Spiro Manthou do not include their names. But Boe said today his anonymity on the review form wasn’t intentional; he and other members directly submitted the forms as part of the collaborative evaluation process, he said.

“I wrote those to inform my fellow council members, not really for public consumption,” Boe added.  “If we write them as if they are for public consumption, we might not write them with the same intensity.  So, I just answered them straight up.”

Now that the records are public, “I’m not going to say they’re not mine,” Boe said.

In her own evaluation of Anderson, Strickland largely stuck up for the city manager’s work,  at one-point even criticizing some of her fellow council members for criticizing him:

“At times, it feels as though some council members forget that Tacoma has a City Manager form of government, try to play `gotcha’ with the City Manager and sometimes get bogged down in process instead of focusing on ideal outcomes for the city,” she wrote.

The News Tribune obtained the personal evaluations under a public records request to the city. City Attorney Elizabeth Pauli initially withheld the records, citing an exemption from disclosure for “draft”  records. But Pauli later agreed to disclose the records after the TNT appealed, based on legal advice from Tim Ford, Open Government Ombudsman for the Washington Attorney General’s Office.

To read the full 70-pages of records, including members’ personal drafts and evaluations of Anderson, click  here.  Here are some examples of the more opinionated criticisms that were either toned down, revised or edited out of the final evaluation for Anderson:

Jake Fey:

“The ethical issues in the Human Rights and Human Services, Finance and especially the Police Departments are very unsettling. While the Councilmember acknowledges that mistakes in judgment can and do happen from time to time, the lack of good judgment by employees involved makes him wonder if the City Manager is setting the proper tone. The Councilmember finds it incomprehensible that he would consider the withholding of extremely critical facts by the Police Chief in the Zina Linnick (sic) matter `not a lie.’ If the City Manager truly believes that then this Councilmember believes the City Manager has very serious issues to address. Councilmember fails to understand the logic in the City Manager’s failure to take disciplinary action for the withholding of information.”

“This Councilmember is also concerned that the City Manager has put the city in a very difficult position through the utilization of one-time withdrawals from pension funds and restructured borrowing. The City is quickly running out of budget options to balance budgets and, absent a recovered economy, will require the City Manager and the City Council to make more adverse budget cuts in future years.”

“The pattern of conflict with peer governmental managers continues. Councilmember acknowledges the calming of previous friction with some peers but is very concerned with the cavalier attitude toward the Director of Public Utilities that manifested itself during the budget process. The `I get to decide’ philosophy is just not acceptable.”

David Boe:

“The whole Cheney Stadium Upgrade has been, for this Council Member, badly managed — from the lease agreement (what is IN and what is OUT of the project)  to the project procurement itself (and this Councilmember has heard that in the Design/Build Industry the reputation of the City of Tacoma has been seriously damaged by the handling of this project). Standing behind a clause in the contract documents in order to relieve the city of following good project procedures is, for this Council Member, unacceptable on how to run a $30 million public/private project partnership.”

“The City Organization seems to be painfully slow at adopting new technology — with the City’s website being embarrassingly poor (significantly behind other municipalities in this regard).”

“This Council Member has heard repeated concerns from stakeholders in the community who feel a lack of trust with the City.”

“While the City Manager has always been personally accessible, the general response for new ideas for consideration from this Councilmember is that he runs the `Office of No.’  The impression for this Councilmember is that he allows Council Members to have small projects to keep them busy so that he is able to run the city unfettered.”

“Still much work to be done in attaining an open and engaged goverment. Many in the business community have expressed to this Council Member that they perceive the Municipal Building as a citadel of control rather than an open and engaged advocate for growing existing businesses.”

Ryan Mello:

“I continue to receive complaints and frustrations from other agencies about how difficult the City is to work with, how we do not treat other agencies as partners and often approach disagreements as `our way or the highway.’ This is very concerning and the attitude needs to change to be a more positive partner in the delivery of public services.”

“Several issues have been incredibly frustrating to work on with the Manager over the past year including the Sauros site, Point Ruston redevelopment and most recently the Broadway Center contract renewal. Time and time again, decisions are made at the very last possible minute, misinformation is used in the discussion and external parties are not treated as partners with respect and a `can do’ attitude. These are just some examples where it has seemed incredibly difficult to make any headway on issues — the goal post keeps moving on how to get the projects complete and parties on the other side are dealt untruthful or constantly moving information instead of straighforward, respectful conversation.”

“I hear regular criticism from the general business community and development community about how there is lack of trust with the Manager and significant lack of understanding of what the business and development community need to thrive. They do not see a culture of `yes’ being developed in the City and often see the City as an obstacle and obstructionist. We seem to make things much more difficult than they need to be after analyzing several situations. I also often hear that stakeholders are told one thing while the Council is told another. This is not appropriate nor does it promote a culture of trust and transparency.”

“Unfortunately, I hear regular feedback about how difficult the Manager is to work with from other jurisdictions and service providers…The Manager needs to do more to be respectful and helpful to other agencies, not cause headaches and speed bumps unnecessarily to others.”

Marty Campbell:

“We still fall very short on Economic development planning and execution. Our current strategy does not seem to be working well. Tacoma is not perceived to be a good place to do business. There is more to economic development than free parking and subsidies. In my time on the council, I have seen very little innovation in the economic development department. We are having the same problem as other cities, and when it comes to competing with them we need to be more innovative to regain competitiveness.”

“We need to have a better monitoring process to maintain prudent use of taxpayer money and transparency. We have been in the media too many times over issues of oversight and management errors.”

“I think Eric generally presents well with the media… With all that said, I think the Eric has made some media mistakes. I think the perceptions around truthfulness are at a low point and I don’t think that Eric has resolved it in the eyes of the council, the media or the public.”


Twitter: @lkamb

Leave a comment Comments → 11
  1. auwing1978 says:

    Bravo the Council Members with the Intestinal fortitude to put their name to their comments. A solid “Wimp” rating for those that did not.

  2. Anonymous statements made by council members should be discarded and not kept in public records or documented at all in the first place. Public figures at any level need to be accountable and accept responsibility for the things they say. Period.

  3. pumaintacoma says:


    We elected LEADERS, not wimps who can’t put a name to an evaluation. This is negligence in the corporate world and would be ripe for firing a manager at any level.

    Dear anonymous council members: If you can’t put your name on an evaluation in which is an “essential function of your job,” then you should resign. Unbelievable lack of leadership.

  4. psycodug says:

    So, Anderson didn’t like to be micro managed.. ?? Is that what this is saying here? Who hired that guy?? Should they be held accountable ?

    The council complains about transparency but remain anonymous. ?

    People who do not want to be held accountable are doing something wrong.

  5. dster420 says:

    Peace out, anderson. I hope the next city to get you will research you BEFORE they hire you!! Don’t come back now, ya hear?

  6. What bothers me about this city council is they decided last year and the year before that he was doing a good job to recieve a salary increase. Now he is doing poorly enough to get sacked. I don’t believe his performance change but the perception did.
    I suggest the council and the mayor look towards themselves to determine why the perception changed. We have Cheney Stadium, Sound Transit, billboard, wage increases and many other actions by the Anderson administration that the council and mayor had direct impact.

  7. Anonymous reviews should never be used in any process for removal from office. To those cowards that did not put their names to paper — man/woman up!!!
    Now that these reviews went public…when will the mayor release her annual reviews of each city council member?

  8. psycodug says:

    I know that I have noticed some improvements to the city that I appreciated during his term. I havent dealt directly with anderson but as a manager myself I really hate it when someone tries to tell me how to do my job and then threatens me with it when I do it the way I decide. A decision made from a managment perspective just may differ from one coming from another angle. Which one is best. Time will tell. Not sure what times says about Andersons term, havent really bothered to look because things seemed to be improving. Now, the council is a different story. Members being paid for meetings they do not attend is a concern, thier effectiveness is a concern, Micro-Managing the City Manager they loved a minute ago is a concern, and I am sure if we all looked into it we would find concerns over every council member and demand they be dismissed.

  9. tacoman1 says:

    While un signed evaluations trouble me , and I tend to agree specifically on the Zina Linnick issue. The bottom line is he was a contract employee and subject to annual renewal. I however must give him credit for the clean and safe initiatives as it pertains to crime prevention, and shady landlords. The city workers / staff in those positions have excelled and served us well , working in difficult situations.

  10. some bad a$$ detective work linking the anonymous council member comments about the Cheney stadium fiasco to Mr. Boe. Louis Lamb has earned herself another journalism award.

    HERE IS ANOTHER SCOOP: Superman is Clark Kent.

  11. I just went through all 70 pages of the transcripts. It doesn’t matter to me who signed and who didn’t, but here’s the impression that I DID get: Most of the Council spent their time trying to say what a great job the guy did. I think that Lauren Walker may actually be related by blood to the man, for crying out loud!!!
    The guy raided pension funds, borrowed money for everyday spending and burned up savings like maui wowie in a bong.
    Here’s the scoop, folks (Council and voters, alike). WE, the Citizens of Tacoma elect (hire) the Council. The Council, then, hires the Manager. Now, ADD the word F-I-R-E to both subjects! If he doesn’t do the job, we fire THEM. And they had better start making every one of those evaluations public. Not 12 months ago, we heard how great he was because he balanced the budget without tax increases or layoffs AND gave a HUGE pay increase. Now, we here that it was “voodoo economics”.
    3 seats will be up for grabs in November. Pay attention, people. It’s gonna get nasty.

We welcome comments. Please keep them civil, short and to the point. ALL CAPS, spam, obscene, profane, abusive and off topic comments will be deleted. Repeat offenders will be blocked. Thanks for taking part and abiding by these simple rules.

Follow the comments on this post with RSS 2.0