Political Buzz

Talking WA politics.

NOTICE: Political Buzz has moved.

With the launch of our new website, we've moved Political Buzz.
Visit the new section.

Ferry unions reach contract deal with governor

Post by Jordan Schrader / The News Tribune on March 5, 2011 at 10:44 am with 5 Comments »
March 5, 2011 10:44 am

Gov. Chris Gregoire called it a “historical” level of sacrifice by ferry unions, who are giving up nearly $7 million in the form of 3 percent pay cuts and $13 million in other savings to the state over the next two years.

But there were few details about those other concessions at a press conference Gregoire held with ferry management and unions Friday. It’s all part of a deal that isn’t sealed until contracts are approved by the union rank-and-file, and Gregoire said she wanted those union members to hear the details before the public.

But she touted a total of $30 million in savings to the state ferry system, between the pay and benefit cuts that leaders of most ferry unions have agreed to and $10 million in cuts Gregoire says she is making to management and administrative overhead. (There are few details, but the cuts are in addition to previous efficiencies, and don’t include the reduction in ferry runs she says are necessary to solve a huge budget gap).

To some degree, both union concessions and management cuts are attempts to head off the changes that some lawmakers want to make in the ferry system.

For example, Rep. Larry Seaquist, D-Gig Harbor, wants a committee to take over the ferry system and prepare it for new management, he says. He blames management for the problems with the ferry system exposed by a KING 5 series.

And Sen. Mary Margaret Haugen, D-Camano Island, wants to treat ferry workers’ unions like other unions in bargaining. She wants to prohibit contracts from being more generous to ferry workers than other public employees on issues like overtime, vacations and travel time.

Haugen said it’s too soon to say whether Friday’s agreement makes her proposals unnecessary; Seaquist praised the unions for their sacrifices but dismissed management changes as a repeat of cuts that had been announced earlier.

Leave a comment Comments → 5
  1. I have a dream. That dream is that all elected and politically appointed government officials agree to accept a 3% pay cut. When that dream is realized, I’ll think again about whether or not union workers should accept such a cut.

  2. steilacoomtaxpayer says:

    zarar, 3% is zip. 10% for everyone and no OT abuse. Let Sontag’s office do constant audits.

  3. dster420 says:

    When is Gov. Grinch going to take a pay cut? No mention of that, no top level managers, just Teachers, Laborers,etc……..

  4. Were these the unions getting double-time for ALL overtime, or was that county or city – I am too lazy to actually check my facts – Actually, I’m thinking that might qualify me running for governer of this illustrious state. (I will accept 6 figures for ticket taker though)

    Damn! that job is already taken

  5. joe_public says:

    I dont think Washington state residence should have to pay for a program that is not self sustaining, Washington transit systems have yet to cover their own expenses, Private companies should be allowed to run these. They should be user supported, not taxpayer shouldered.

*
We welcome comments. Please keep them civil, short and to the point. ALL CAPS, spam, obscene, profane, abusive and off topic comments will be deleted. Repeat offenders will be blocked. Thanks for taking part and abiding by these simple rules.

Follow the comments on this post with RSS 2.0