Political Buzz

Talking WA politics.

NOTICE: Political Buzz has moved.

With the launch of our new website, we've moved Political Buzz.
Visit the new section.

Follow the Money: Outside groups spending big on Rossi

Post by lesblumenthal on Oct. 18, 2010 at 5:08 pm with 5 Comments »
October 18, 2010 6:05 pm

Independent groups have nearly doubled their spending in the Washington state Senate race in the past 10 days as Republicans especially realize control of the chamber could depend on the outcome of the race between Democratic Sen. Patty Murray and GOP challenger Dino Rossi.

Nearly $6.9 million in independent expenditures have now been spent in the Senate race with party committees, groups connected with GOP operative Karl Rove, the National Rifle Association and the American College of Surgeons among the recent top spenders, according to the Sunlight Foundation, a non-profit, non-partisan government watchdog group. (Search their database here.)

More than 60 percent of the money has been spent by groups opposing Murray. The independent expenditures have helped level the playing field for Rossi as Murray had about twice as much money in her campaign account at the end of September as her opponent.

And with the election two weeks away, the flow of independent dollars is expected to continue.

“My guess is this is not the end of it,” said Jennifer Duffy, a senior editor with the Cook Report.

Another analyst, Nathan Gonzales, political editor of the Rothenberg Report, said the race is attracting a lot of attention because neither candidate has established a solid lead.

“The Senate playing field comes down to Washington, California and West Virginia,” Gonzales said. “Washington is a must win state for Republicans if they want to get to the 10 they need to take control of the Senate.”

Republicans and other conservative groups know it.

The National Republican Senatorial Committee reported spending over $1 million on Oct. 12 and American Crossroads, a Karl Rove related group, spent nearly $275,000. When added to the spending of Crossroads GPS, another Rove related group, a total of more than $1 million has been injected into the Senate race by groups associated with the former political adviser to President George Bush.

Also in the past week or so, the NRA has spent $225,000 boosting Rossi.

Democratic aligned groups are not standing on the sidelines. The Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee reported spending more than $731,000 in recent days and the American College of Surgeons spent nearly $93,000 supporting Murray.

Groups opposing Murray have spent $3.3 million and those opposing Rossi $2.1 million.
Independent expenditures have also become a factor in three of the state’s congressional races:

■ In the open 3rd Congressional District Race more than $2.1 million has spent by independent groups, with roughly twice as much being spent opposing Democrat Dennis Heck than Republican Jamie Herrera. The National Republican Congressional Committee has spent almost $933,000 and the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee $642,000, according to the Sunlight Foundation. The district stretches from Olympia south to the Columbia River.

The American Future Fund, a conservative group which has focused on health care issues, has also spent $480,000 opposing Heck.

■ In the 2nd Congressional District in northwest Washington, independent groups have spent $1.2 million. All of the money, mostly from the American Future Fund, has been spent opposing incumbent Democratic Rep. Rick Larsen.

■ In the 8th Congressional District in east King and Pierce counties, independent groups have spent nearly $670,000, most of it supporting incumbent Republican Rep. Dave Reichert. The National Association of Realtors was the leading spender at $550,300.

Prior to a 5-4 Supreme Court decision in January there were strict limits on how much contributors could give and rules requiring the disclosure of contributors’ names. The court however, removed the curbs on how much independent groups could give and ruled the names of contributors, in many cases, don’t have to be disclosed. The independent groups can have no contact with the actual campaigns to coordinate their advertising message.

Critics say the decision has opened up the political process to secret, unlimited corporate contributions while defenders say it’s a freedom of speech issue.

The business community, unions and other interest groups and political committees have taken advantage of the ruling.

The independent spending supplements what the campaigns raise and spend on their own.
As of Sept. 30, Murray had raised $13.7 million, spent $14.6 million and had $3.2 in her campaign account, according to the latest Federal Election Commission filings. Of Murray’s contributions, about $10.2 million came from individuals and almost $3.4 million from political action committees.

President Barack Obama raised more than $700,000 for Murray during a campaign swing several months ago. Obama, Vice President Biden and former President Bill Clinton are expected to raise additional money for Murray during visits this week.

Rossi has raised $5.6 million since launching his campaign earlier this year, spent nearly $2.6 million and has $1.7 million in the bank, according to FEC reports.

Of Rossi’s contributions, $5.2 million came from individual contributors and $387,000 from PACs.

Leave a comment Comments → 5
  1. jollymon says:

    Thank you, Justice Roberts, for allowing this unbridled political spending. How could we ever have chosen a senator without it all.

  2. OldLefty says:

    Note the sudden silence from Rossi supporters……

  3. Sudden silence from Rossi supporters? What the heck does that mean? Rossi supporters are supposed to be ashamed that people (via groups that they support and donate to) are funding a campaign?

    Like the article states: “Murray had about twice as much money in her campaign account at the end of September as her opponent.” and “Democratic aligned groups are not standing on the sidelines.”

    Murry’s money obviously didn’t all come directly to her campaign a dollar at a time from ordinary “folks” any more than Rossi’s did.

    They are both raising money hand over fist.
    I think it’s a very bad thing that it takes that much money to get elected, but it’s the nature of the beast. This is why all politicians are “beholding” to someone or another after they get in office.

  4. Jonspach says:

    Given the headline of this article, I was kind of surprised to read in the last line that Murray is getting $3.4 million from political action committees against Rossi’s $387,000 — it’s clear that both Murray and Rossi are getting outside money, with Murray taking the lion’s share of the total dollar amounts.

    I’m curious why the editor decided to publish a headline suggesting this was a one-sided issue.

  5. Proconsul8 says:

    So Jumpin’ Joe is coming to town to boost Murray’s otherwise immaculate reputation as a “voice of the little man”, crusader for the children, saver of the tax dollar. Maybe he can tell us how well her votes worked on the stimulus bill that brought nary a job to Washington, or the health care bill that Boeing now says they must use the “McDonald’s exception” to avoid or pass the cost onto their employees. Don’t worry about where the money comes from, worry about where Patty and Company have already sent our money TO! At least the contributions are voluntary – taxes and penalties aren’t.

We welcome comments. Please keep them civil, short and to the point. ALL CAPS, spam, obscene, profane, abusive and off topic comments will be deleted. Repeat offenders will be blocked. Thanks for taking part and abiding by these simple rules.

Follow the comments on this post with RSS 2.0