Political Buzz

Talking WA politics.

NOTICE: Political Buzz has moved.

With the launch of our new website, we've moved Political Buzz.
Visit the new section.

WA’s 8th District: It’s gonna be a mud-bath (and already is…)

Post by Lewis Kamb / The News Tribune on Oct. 14, 2010 at 5:35 pm with 3 Comments »
October 15, 2010 10:12 am

Got a rain slicker and a good pair of boots?

Not to be outdone by the Patty Murray-Dino Rossi raunch-fest, but the mud is also flying fast and furiously in Washington’s 8th Congressional district — with the campaign of three-term Republican incumbent Congressman Dave Reichert (and supporters) striking back in force this week.

After the campaign of Democratic challenger Suzan DelBene has peppered the airwaves for the past few weeks with ads attacking Reichert on his record (think deep voice-overs intoning gloom over ominous background music, with bad headshots of Reichert – if that’s at all possible), Reichert’s campaign came back with some negative campaign mojo of its own.

(Some of DelBene’s offerings …)

Earlier this week, the former top cop’s Congressional campaign set up the “Who is Suzan DelBene” website, replete with a grainy black and white photo of the opponent, and a growing list of “25 Ways Suzan Is Wrong” that visitors are encouraged to re-visit on a daily basis for the latest installment. (Any website that posts red-lettering on a black background field can’t claim to target the glass half-full set, can it?)

Also throughout this week, individuals tweeting their support for Reichert and Red County, the right-leaning blog, have repeatedly questioned why DelBene could have omitted from her campaign website biography (and her wikipedia entry) her long-running affiliation with Portland-based Reed College’s Board of Trustees. Here’s Red County’s spin:

Why then does this laudable credential not appear on DelBene’s campaign bio or the entry for her in Wikipedia? Perhaps because during DelBene’s tenure on the board, Reed College’s comfy reputation as a playground for chemical experimentation began to clash with the harsh realities of a pair of heroin overdoses and a challenge from Oregon’s U.S. District Attorney to shape up, or else.

(Red County and Reichert supporters have been quick to characterize Reed as a bastion for Godless commies in their posts and tweets associating the college with DelBene. Absent though has been any mention that Reed also has consistently rated among the best and most diverse small colleges in the nation, according to Newsweek’s annual higher ed rankings; or the fact that the college is DelBene’s alma mater).

On balance, the Red County offering seems to counter-act — or, at least attempts to — previous postings first published on the left-leaning Slog and Horse’sAss blogs that questioned Reichert’s fitness for office due to a recent brain injury.

And today, the Reichert camp unleashed its latest spot: A guilt-by-association number that pits DelBene and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi as one in the same — and invokes the L-word: They’re “down-the-line liberals” who together will steer the nation right into the financial gutter, the ad suggests (Oddly, Reichert purports to be good friends with Pelosi, since his princely recovery of her shoe in 2005. But how’s the old addage go? With friends like that …).

With nearly three more weeks to go til Election Day, it can’t get much muddier — can it?

Leave a comment Comments → 3
  1. newshound100 says:

    Please get out of the TV studios and actually meet and talk with voters . I could not point Susan DelBene out of a line up. What does a Microsoft multi millionaire have in common with me ? Does she even know what a double-wide is ?
    Please rich folks find another hobby I’m tired.

  2. cliffallo says:

    Does the TNT’s Editorial Board still relish Dave Reichert’s “refreshingly congenial and bipartisan temperament?”

    Does Reichert know or care how much of the accumulated debt was borrowed under Presidents Reagan, Bush, and Bush? And that he voted for much of the deficits!

    The Reichert spot screams about 13 trillion in federal debt but ignores that the fact that 70% of that total was borrowed under Reagan, Bush, and Bush and that Clinton even had a budget surpluses in each year of his second term.

    Recognizing that the President’s first nine months in office are largely under the previously adopted budget, I’m using the debt level (not annual deficit) at the end of the first September for each President so that we’re looking at the budgets he signed rather than inherited.

    09/30/1981 * 997,855,000,000.00 End of Carter Start of Reagan
    09/30/1993 4,411,488,883,139.38 End of G. H. W. Bush Start of Clinton
    09/30/2001 5,807,463,412,200.06 End of Clinton Start of G. W. Bush
    09/30/2009 11,909,829,003,511.75 End of G. W. Bush Start of Obama
    09/30/2010 13,561,623,030,891.79 End of Obama’s first year

    Debt incurred prior to Reagan–not quite one trillion dollars.
    Debt incurred under Reagan Bush & Bush 9.52 trillion dollars
    Debt incurred under Clinton & Obama 3.05 trillion dollars

    It takes time for Democrats to clean up after borrow and spend Republicans. George W. Bush out-did his father in leaving a damaged economy.

    Again it is extraordinary for Reichert to slam DelBene when Reichert was in Congress while 58.5% of the entire total was borrowed. And he brags about being on the appropriations committee.

  3. cliffallo says:

    My error: Although Representative Reichert sought appointment to the House Appropriations Committee, he did not receive that assignment.

We welcome comments. Please keep them civil, short and to the point. ALL CAPS, spam, obscene, profane, abusive and off topic comments will be deleted. Repeat offenders will be blocked. Thanks for taking part and abiding by these simple rules.

Follow the comments on this post with RSS 2.0