Political Buzz

Talking WA politics.

NOTICE: Political Buzz has moved.

With the launch of our new website, we've moved Political Buzz.
Visit the new section.

Seattle v. Tacoma in billboard wars: How about billboards on top of skyscrapers?

Post by Peter Callaghan / The News Tribune on Aug. 9, 2010 at 9:35 am | 1 Comment »
August 9, 2010 8:43 am

Over at Crosscut, architect Mark Hinshaw writes about a so-far under-the-radar move by some Seattle bureaucrats to legalize building-top billboards.

The pathway would be an amendment to the city sign code that was slowed down only when an activist noticed and started sounding the alarm.

This little amendment would allow any commercial tenant to affix four lighted signs, each 350 square feet (roughly the size of two parking stalls) to the top of its building. City staff estimate there are 10 buildings with tenants large enough to qualify. And get this: the City has issued a statement declaring there would be no significant impact.

Hinshaw is an architect and urban planner who drafted Tacoma’s Destination Downtown urban development code.

Tacoma’s city council recently approved a settlement of a lawsuit by Clear Channel that sets the stage for an ordinance permitting digital video billboards. The digital signs would come in trade for the removal of static billboards that had been banned by a 1997 city ordinance.

The News Tribune now uses Facebook commenting on selected blogs. See editor's column for more details. Commenters are expected to abide by terms of service for Facebook as well as commenting rules for thenewstribune.com. Report violators to webmaster@thenewstribune.com.