Political Buzz

Talking WA politics.

NOTICE: Political Buzz has moved.

With the launch of our new website, we've moved Political Buzz.
Visit the new section.

The Lower Taxes Party and the Neither Party

Post by Jordan Schrader / The News Tribune on June 7, 2010 at 2:39 pm with 3 Comments »
June 9, 2010 9:27 am

Washington politicians can have their party affiliation listed on the ballot as just about anything.

So among candidates who filed today to run, we’ve already got a “Prefers Neither Party” (that would be Jon T. Haugen, running for the state House seat left vacant by Jaime Herrera’s decision to run for Congress) and a “Prefers Lower Taxes Party” (a group with exactly one member, Tim Sutinen, challenging Rep. Brian Blake).

Lots of candidates will be listed as “Prefers Democratic Party,” but at least two, Sen. Paul Shinn and Louise Chadez, prefer the “Democrat Party,” which strictly speaking, doesn’t exist any more than the Lower Taxes Party. You usually only hear “Democrat Party” from Republicans using it as a pejorative term.

And when speaking of parties that don’t exist, there’s always the “GOP Party,” which would be the Grand Old Party Party. It makes about as much sense as a “PIN number,” but it was a popular label in 2004 2008, when the Republican brand was suffering. Dino Rossi even used it.

My guess is he won’t this year, as polls show Republicans eroding Democrats’ advantage in party identification. So far in the filing, most Republicans are just Republicans. I only see one GOP member, Sen. Jerome Delvin.

The folks down at the secretary of state’s office – who are urging candidates to please, please use real party names – say anyone who wants to be identified on the ballot with the GOP should remember to put periods between the initials (G.O.P.). Otherwise they’ll be on the ballot as “Prefers Gop Party.”

Leave a comment Comments → 3
  1. I hope the Legislature, whoever is in control, takes up this issue next January and ends the practice of making up phony parties. It’s dishonest. The Supreme Court says they have the right to lie in their own literature, but we don’t have to pay for it in state funded ballots and voter pamphlet. This is just ridiculous.

  2. Jon Haugen may have filed as “prefers neither party,” be is just another tax happy Democrat.

    He ran unsuccessfully against Zarelli in 2008.

    In 2006, he fronted an initiative that was to change the three fifths majority needed to raise taxes to three sixths, basically what Democrats did this year that gave us a whole new slew of tax increases.

    He can call himself Independent if he chooses, but he obviously just another tax happy Democrat.

  3. You don’t have to be tax happy to believe in democracy. You might recall that the initiative passed with a small majority. Certainly not the 2/3 it required.

We welcome comments. Please keep them civil, short and to the point. ALL CAPS, spam, obscene, profane, abusive and off topic comments will be deleted. Repeat offenders will be blocked. Thanks for taking part and abiding by these simple rules.

Follow the comments on this post with RSS 2.0