Political Buzz

Talking WA politics.

NOTICE: Political Buzz has moved.

With the launch of our new website, we've moved Political Buzz.
Visit the new section.

Lack of signatures kills foreclosure bill

Post by Jordan Schrader / The News Tribune on Feb. 12, 2010 at 12:37 pm with 4 Comments »
February 16, 2010 1:34 am

Sometimes the ayes don’t have it.

As the Senate Ways and Means Committee rushed to beat a deadline earlier this week for bills to advance,  it quickly approved Senate Bill 6648, aimed at reducing foreclosures by requiring large banks to enter mediation with homeowners before foreclosing. At least that’s what it sounded like the committee did.

There were a few “ayes” and at least one “no,” and Chairwoman Margarita Prentice declared the bill passed, moving it on to the Rules Committee.

But it was the end of the line for the bill.

Just four senators signed the majority report, not enough to give it a majority of the committee’s support.

The bill’s cost concerned Sen. Debbie Regala, she told me, so she signed without recommendation. “We’re desperately trying to figure out how to balance our budget, so no matter how wonderful some new idea might be, this is not the time,” she said.

The bill would cost nearly $20 million over the next three years, according to projections. But the cost would be paid by fees on lenders and the borrowers who choose mediation, said Statewide Poverty Action Network director Beverly Spears, who pushed the bill.

The poverty network’s lobbyists left the meeting thinking they had scored a win, but soon learned their bill was dead without the signatures of Regala and Sens. Rodney Tom, Ed Murray and Steve Hobbs, Spears said.

“Once again, big banks win out over taxpayers and people in trouble,” she said.

Leave a comment Comments → 4
  1. plmbrdude says:

    2.8 billion to the banks yes! 20 mil-to help out home owners no! you all suck.

  2. bigbarb43 says:

    And this is what they call representing the people that elect them?

  3. jthammett says:

    note the political party ascribed to by the “naysayers”.

  4. Sarajane46th says:

    I find it outrageous that the committee chair cannot round up the signatures of those who voted by voice vote to pass this consumer bill that has no budget impact. Something is deeply wrong here. Those who voted Aye or failed to vote Nay should be held accountable. Period.

*
We welcome comments. Please keep them civil, short and to the point. ALL CAPS, spam, obscene, profane, abusive and off topic comments will be deleted. Repeat offenders will be blocked. Thanks for taking part and abiding by these simple rules.

Follow the comments on this post with RSS 2.0