Political Buzz

Talking WA politics.

NOTICE: Political Buzz has moved.

With the launch of our new website, we've moved Political Buzz.
Visit the new section.

Bill would fix dispute over county ballot titles

Post by Peter Callaghan / The News Tribune on Dec. 14, 2009 at 2:41 pm with 5 Comments »
December 14, 2009 2:41 pm

Lakewood Democrat Tami Green and Tacoma Democrat Troy Kelley have pre-filed a bill to fix a gap in how local governments prepare ballot titles.

It emerged last year when supporters of term limits wanted to contest the way Pierce County attorneys had written the statement for a charter amendment extending term limits.

Opponents of Amendment No. 1 thought the statement was argumentative in support of the measure. But by the time they objected, the 10-day period to protest had passed.

Those same opponents said they had complained within 10 days of the deadline for filing the ballot title. But the law says objections must be filed within 10 days of the title’s completion. Since county lawyers beat the deadline by many days, the time to object had come and gone before most knew it had even been written.

So Green and Kelley would use House Bill 2405 to clarify that local government ballot titles can be objected to within 10 days of the filing deadline, regardless of how quickly county attorneys complete the work.

In the end, Amendment 1 failed badly, regardless of the ballot title, and Pierce County retained its two-term limit on office holders.

Leave a comment Comments → 5
  1. khaughton says:

    It would be nice if the Prosecuting Attorney’s office was required to run ballot titles by the duly appointed voters pamphlet committees before sending their proposed titles to the Auditor. Right now, the Prosecuting Attorney’s office requires volunteer committee members to spend their own money to sue to have any say whatsoever in the process. That is not good government.

  2. crusader says:

    Legalize it. Tax it.

  3. S_Emerson says:

    Ahhhhh. That nasty lawsuit may have paid off. Please, voters, urge your state representative(s) to support this bill!

  4. smcelhiney says:

    Need to put in the same “one item” limit as well. The mixing of unrelated items in an attempt to get what they wanted passed was disturbing.

  5. bigbarb43 says:

    The council’s attempt sneak in the back door by changing the term limits was an example of how the wording can be confusing. Each title should cover one item and only one item and have no reference as to how any other city or county conducts their business.

We welcome comments. Please keep them civil, short and to the point. ALL CAPS, spam, obscene, profane, abusive and off topic comments will be deleted. Repeat offenders will be blocked. Thanks for taking part and abiding by these simple rules.

Follow the comments on this post with RSS 2.0