Political Buzz

Talking WA politics.

NOTICE: Political Buzz has moved.

With the launch of our new website, we've moved Political Buzz.
Visit the new section.

County Council eliminates Hecht’s seat to save money

Post by David Wickert on Nov. 3, 2009 at 3:57 pm with 6 Comments »
November 9, 2009 2:25 pm

The Pierce County Council has eliminated the Superior Court seat held by Judge Michael Hecht just a day after he resigned.

The council unanimous approved an emergency ordinance eliminating Hecht’s position at its regular meeting Tuesday.

Council members said the move would save money as the county struggles to balance its 2010 budget. The remaining $19,000 of Hecht’s 2009 compensation will be used to hire pro-tem judges so cases will continue to be heard.

“At some point you have to consider lots of different things that you wouldn’t consider in the past,” Council Chairman Roger Bush, R-Graham, said in an interview after the meeting.

The move came with no public notice and apparently took County Executive Pat McCarthy by surprise. A spokesman for McCarthy said she had been in meetings all day and needed more time to study the council’s decision.

Presiding Superior Court Judge Bryan Chushcoff could not be reached for comment.

Prosecuting Attorney Mark Lindquist learned of the proposal on Tuesday before the council vote. He said failing to fill Hecht’s seat would aggravate a backlog of Superior Court cases that he and judges have been working to address.

“The community has suffered for nine months because (Hecht’s seat) has been empty,” Lindquist said. “We shouldn’t have to suffer another year with an empty department.”

The council’s action is the latest twist involving Hecht, who was elected last year but has spent most of 2009 on paid leave in light of alleged criminal conduct. He was convicted last week of felony harassment and paying a man for sex.

Hecht resigned on Monday, and Gov. Chris Gregoire was preparing to begin a search for his replacement.

The County Council’s decision apparently puts that search on hold.

Superior Court judges are part county, part state employees. State law authorizes Pierce County to have up to 24 Superior Court judges, though the council has authorized only 22 positions until now.

Tuesday’s actions would reduce the number of Pierce County Superior Court judges to 21. By comparison, King County is allotted up to 58 Superior Court judges, but currently employs only 53.

Bush said the council’s staff has not found another example of a county reducing the number of Superior Court judges.

The move comes as the council is pouring over McCarthy’s 2010 budget in search of additional savings.

In the face of declining revenue, McCarthy has proposed a $792 million budget – 8 percent lower than this year’s already reduced budget.

But in recent budget hearings council members have expressed concern that McCarthy’s revenue assumptions may prove optimistic. They’re considering additional spending cuts.

“We have yet to hear good (budget) news,” Bush said. “We keep hearing negative news.”

For the rest of 2009, the remaining $19,000 Hecht was to be paid will be used to pay for pro-tem judges who can hear cases. Bush said that will amount to an increase in Superior Court funding this year, as Hecht has been on paid leave since March and has not been hearing cases.

The council hasn’t made a final decision on whether the post will be included in the 2010 budget.

Councilman Dick Muri, R-Steilacoom, said it probably won’t be included initially.

He said the council could reinstate the post at any time if revenue improves. He expects the council to revisit the issue early next year.

Lindquist said he has encouraged council members to pay for the position effective March 1. He said he’s optimistic “they will see the wisdom of funding the position in 2010.”

Bush said he’s been thinking about eliminating Hecht’s position since August. But he said the council could not legally eliminate a Superior Court post held by a sitting judge.

He said the opportunity to eliminate the post came after Hecht resigned on Monday.

State and county laws require public notice and hearings before the council can act on an ordinance. But there is an exception for emergency circumstances.

The council cited declining county revenues and the need to act quickly in order to spend the rest of Hecht’s 2009 salary on pro- tem judges.

“The emergency is, we’re running out of money,” Muri said. “And any time we see an opportunity that requires quick action, we’re going to take it.”

Hecht, 59, defeated incumbent Superior Court Judge Sergio Armijo last year. But in January The News Tribune reported that Tacoma police and state authorities were investigating Hecht on possible criminal charges.

On Oct. 28 a jury found Hecht guilty of buying sex from a male prostitute and threatening to kill a man after Hecht found out he was talking about their alleged previous sexual relationship.

Hecht is scheduled to be sentenced on Nov. 19.

Here’s the press release from the Pierce County Council:

Nov. 3, 2009

In light of Pierce County Superior Court Judge Michael Hecht’s felony conviction and subsequent resignation, the County Council today unanimously passed an emergency ordinance eliminating Hecht’s soon-to-be vacant seat to save money in a still-worsening budget environment.

The ordinance dissolves Department 9 of Superior Court effective Nov. 16 – when Hecht’s resignation takes effect – and shifts the department’s $19,000 in remaining 2009 funds to hiring pro-tem judges so cases will continue to be heard. The move may help realize savings in the 2010 budget, which will need severe reductions due to a continued drop in county revenue.

“We want to put this unfortunate episode behind us and move quickly to ensure there’s no interruption in judicial services in our county,” Council Chairman Roger Bush said. “Eliminating this vacant position prevents us from making more drastic budget reductions later on.”

The council took the unusual step of declaring an emergency, Bush noted, because ever-dropping revenues are putting the county’s public-safety departments at imminent risk of reductions during the remainder of 2009. Reallocating the funds in Department 9 will free-up money for pro-tem judge help that was unavailable while Hecht was drawing a salary from Pierce County but unable to carry out his duties.

“The intent is to drive more money into the court this year and save additional revenue next year and into the future,” Bush said.

State law sets the maximum number of Superior Court judges in each county. Pierce County’s maximum number is 24; there will be 21 after the council ordinance takes effect. By comparison, King County is allotted a maximum of 58 Superior Court judges but currently employs 53, and Spokane County is allowed a maximum of 13 judges but has 12.

The County Council will continue to review the proposed 2010 budget until Nov. 10, when councilmembers are scheduled to adopt the final budget at their regular 3 p.m. meeting in the Council Chambers (930 Tacoma Ave. S., Room 1045, Tacoma). A complete schedule of remaining budget hearings is available on the council’s budget Web page, www.piercecountywa.gov/pc/abtus/ourorg/council/budget.htm <http://www.piercecountywa.gov/pc/abtus/ourorg/council/budget.htm> .

CONTACT: Brad Chatfield, Council Communications Manager, 253-798-6626

Leave a comment Comments → 6
  1. You mean we could have been saving over 100K a year?

  2. mcgyver says:

    How much money can a toilet seat save?

  3. Mudhen200 says:

    At least the (thankfully) former Judge Armijo wont be able to weasel his way back into the job he was voted out of, despite his son’s efforts.

  4. DannnyG says:

    I think the story, based on the other story, meant to say that we will be saving the money from his seat…

    To pay for health care benefits for the remaining judges!

  5. There is no “emergency.” This was a move to eliminate the position before the governor could vote on the matter.

    Here is an email I received on the matter:


    Family Law Section Members:

    As the president of this Section. I write to you with some “breaking news” that I find utterly astounding and deeply concerning.

    Late this afternoon our courthouse was abuzz with the stunning announcement that the Pierce County Council has decided, in its alleged wisdom, to pull the funding from Department 9, Pierce County Superior Court, upon the date of the resignation of Judge Michael A. Hecht later this month. Apparently, the Council “reasons” (and I use the term loosely) that, as Department 9 was effectively inoperative since Judge Hecht went on leave earlier this year, our Superior Court can apparently manage quite well with only 21 of our 22 Departments doing the people’s judicial business in this county.

    I do not know if the Council intends this bold and unprecedented action to be temporary or permanent. In a very real sense that does not matter. It is still a completely unacceptable situation so far as I am concerned.

    The ramifications of this shocking decision by our County Council are disturbing and profound at many levels. Two dedicated Court employees, a Judicial Assistant and a Court Reporter, will presumably become unemployed.

    On a more “macro” level, the legendary case backlogs in our Superior Court can only, of course, become even greater as we see our Court shrink rather than expand. Also, as many of you have probably begun to consider already, there is a very intriguing legal question as to whether Washington law, or even our state Constitution, would permit a county legislative body, acting alone, to effectively eliminate one of our Superior Court departments, any more that it might be legal for one of our Superior Court judges to Order and Decree the elimination of, say, a position or two on the Pierce County Council.

    I ask that you consider in the coming days devoting some of your time and energy to communicating with County Council members, state Legislators, and the Pierce County public as a whole, regarding this interesting development, and expressing your thoughts as to the same. Truly, folks, our Superior Court has been pushed to the limit by the other branches of county government. This assault on our judicial system must be challenged and reversed.

    Thank you.

    Michael Scholl

  6. davidbritton says:

    Pierce County’s official announcement of the move states that the remaining $19,000 from the Department 9 budget will be “shifted” to the pro tem judge program, which is currently suspended due to lack of funding. But the same announcement also quotes County Council Chair Roger Bush as saying the elimination of Department 9 will save money. My guess is we’re not getting our pro tem judges back any time soon. If ever.

    If “justice delayed is justice denied,” the Council has just denied justice to a lot more people in this County. By virtually guaranteeing that it will continue to be impossible to have a civil case tried in this county, the Council is ending a message to all that justice is a very low priority here.

We welcome comments. Please keep them civil, short and to the point. ALL CAPS, spam, obscene, profane, abusive and off topic comments will be deleted. Repeat offenders will be blocked. Thanks for taking part and abiding by these simple rules.

Follow the comments on this post with RSS 2.0