Congressman Smith: Afghanistan not another Vietnam
Posted By John Henrikson on September 9, 2009 at 3:28 pm
Share this
This just in from D.C. correspondent Les Blumenthal.

Rep. Adam Smith, D-Tacoma
“This is ground zero for al-Qaida,” Smith said. “They are still there, they are still plotting against the West. We have to deal with that threat. As much as we would like to avoid it, we can’t.”
Smith’s comments came as the Pentagon worked on a new military strategy for Afghanistan and the White House, in the next few months, will have to decide whether to deploy additional troops. Army Gen. Stanley McChrystal, the top commander in Afghanistan, has said the situation is “serious,” but the war is still winnable. McChrystal has not said how many additional soldiers he will ask for, but such a request is considered likely.
The United States and NATO have more than 100,000 soldiers deployed, including the 3,900-member 5th Brigade, 2nd Infantry Division and other units from Fort Lewis. Obama has already boosted U.S. troop strength in Afghanistan by 21,000 since taking office.
There is growing unease among Democrats about the course of the war. But with health care dominating the political landscape, the war in Afghanistan has received only scant attention.
As a member of the House Intelligence Committee and the chairman of the House Armed Service subcommittee that oversees special operations forces, Smith has become a rising force in national security issues on Capitol Hill.
“In many cases people want to believe we can painlessly pull out of there,” Smith said. “This is not Iraq. Iraq never had the Taliban.”
The congressman said the Taliban provide “aid, comfort and support” to al-Qaida.
But the Taliban has little support among the Afghan people, who remember their harsh treatment when they were last in power, Smith said.
“The Afghan people hate the Taliban,” Smith said, but adding the Taliban “fill the vacuum’ as the government of President Hamid Karzai struggles to gain control and provide security.
Smith on a trip sponsored by his Terrorism and Unconventional Threats subcommittee, said he and two other congressmen met with McChrystal and his staff, other military leaders, the U.S. ambassadors, members of the Afghani parliament, cabinet-level Pakistani officials and other diplomats.
Smith warned against unfounded comparisons to Vietnam or even to previous foreign involvement in Afghanistan.
The Taliban are not nearly as popular with the people of Afghanistan as Ho Chi Minh was with the Vietnamese, he said.
“He was going to win and we were on the wrong side,” Smith said. “The Taliban are on the wrong side in this war.”
The British, Soviets and other foreign nations sought to conquer Afghanistan to use it as an “economic outpost,” Smith said. The U.S. just wants to block al-Qaida from gaining a safe haven and withdraw as soon as possible, the congressman said.
“We don’t want to occupy or control it,” he said.
The current dispute over the presidential election in which Karzai has been accused of electoral irregularities is a setback for the United States, said Smith. But America needs to be careful not to pick sides or pick winners, he said.
Smith said he wants to see what McChrystal recommends before deciding whether he would support sending additional U.S. troops.
Les Blumenthal: 202-383-0008
lblumenthal@mcclatchydc.com







"...The Taliban are not nearly as popular with the people of Afghanistan as Ho Chi Minh was with the Vietnamese, he said..."
Has he lost his mind?
This is a slap in the face of those South Vietnamese that fought the communist invasion from the north.
"...“He was going to win and we were on the wrong side,”..."
I think he should reserve a room at Western State hospital and take a little time off. He has gone way over the edge!!!
“He was going to win and we were on the wrong side,” My God. Does this man even understand his history? I doubt he understands Afghanistan any better. He thinks we should have supported the Communist North Vietnamese, China, and the Soviet Union?
Please TNT ask for clarification.
I am a veteran with two tours in Vietnam, and I don't know if Congressman Smith is out of his mind, but I would like to know what he's been smoking.
His learned and authoritarian pronouncements about the popularity of Ho Chi Minh may have some validity in what was once North Vietnam. I hesitate to question such an authority on the Vietnam War as Congressman Smith, but when I was patrolling around Saigon during and after Tet 1968, I was moved by the reception that my unit received from the citizenry. It was clear that they rejected the communists and the communist leader, Ho Chi Minh. Of course, I was only there and my views may have been flawed. Mr. Smith has the advantage of not having been there, but he seems quite convinced that he can speak more authoritatively than those of us who were. I'm quite amazed by his declaration that I and my comrades "fought on the wrong side." I suppose that I shouldn't be surprised at such a statement coming from a member of a party dominated by an ideology reminiscent of that of Ho Chi Minh.
Mike Brown
Proud Vietnam Veteran (1967-1968/1971-1972) who'd serve on the same side again!