Political Buzz

Talking WA politics.

NOTICE: Political Buzz has moved.

With the launch of our new website, we've moved Political Buzz.
Visit the new section.

Report: Pierce taxpayers not hurt by missed property inspections

Post by David Wickert on March 31, 2009 at 8:34 am with No Comments »
March 31, 2009 8:34 am

There is no reason to believe property owners were harmed because the Pierce County Assessor-Treasurer’s Office skipped tens of thousands of property inspections in recent years, a new report concludes.


The report, submitted to the County Council Monday (here’s a PDF copy), also finds Pierce County appraisers have a high workload compared to their peers elsewhere in the state. But it concludes there is no need to increase the number of appraisers at this time.


Assessor-Treasurer Dale Washam plans to address the report’s findings at this afternoon’s council meeting. His initial reaction: "It’s not a good report. It’s not accurate."


The report by the council’s performance audit staff comes three weeks after Washam announced the office had failed to inspect at least 181,000 residential properties and tens of thousands of commercial properties as required by state law.


Assessor’s documents and interviews with assessor’s office employees indicate the missed inspections occurred over six or more years under Washam’s predecessor, Ken Madsen.


The law allows local assessors to use statistical methods to assess properties annually for tax purposes. But it requires them to physically inspect every property at least once every six years.


Those inspections can catch significant improvements or deterioration that can affect property values. And they allow appraisers to update property descriptions used in the statistical methods that determine values most years.


Washam told the council recently there is no way of knowing how taxpayers were affected by the missed inspections. The performance audit report reaches a different conclusion:


"There is no reason to believe that individual property taxpayers were harmed by missed physical inspections of their homes in the past," the report states.



If there was any impact, the report concludes it was likely that Pierce County collected less property tax revenue from some taxpayers than it might have had physical inspections been done.


"Parcels with unpermitted construction likely received lower property assessments than would have occurred if every property scheduled for physical inspection had actually been inspected," the report finds. "The loser in such instances was Pierce County, not the individual taxpayer."


The report acknowledges that the owners of properties that deteriorated may have been affected by skipped inspections. "Such taxpayers, however, had the opportunity to appeal if they considered their assessment was unfair," the report concludes.


Among the report’s other findings:


&bull Pierce County property appraisers have the highest workload among six counties studied. There are 8,932 parcels for each Pierce County appraiser, nearly 1,000 parcels higher than Snohomish County and far higher than the 5,442 parcels per appraiser in King County.


&bull While the county may need to increase the number of appraisers in the long run, the assessor’s office has enough staff to meet state requirements. The report finds there is no need to increase the number of Pierce County appraisers for now because the state Department of Revenue will not require the assessor’s office to immediately inspect properties that were skipped last year, as required by law. Instead, the department wants Pierce County to submit a new six-year inspection plan that would start in 2010.


&bull The assessor-treasurer’s office could absorb a budget reduction of $150,000 without resorting to layoffs. The savings would come from not filling a vacant deputy assessor’s job, from lower-than-budgeted software maintenance costs and other savings.


The last finding is a key one, as the County Council today will decide how much to cut the assessor’s budget as it tries to cover an $8 million revenue shortfall. Various departments – from law enforcement to planning and land services – are taking a hit as the council tries to balance the budget.


County Executive Pat McCarthy originally proposed to cut the assessor’s budget by $324,000, or 3 percent. But Washam said such a cut would force him to lay off appraisers and hinder his ability to address the backlog of uninpsected properties.

Categories:
Pierce County
Leave a comment Comments
*
We welcome comments. Please keep them civil, short and to the point. ALL CAPS, spam, obscene, profane, abusive and off topic comments will be deleted. Repeat offenders will be blocked. Thanks for taking part and abiding by these simple rules.

Follow the comments on this post with RSS 2.0