Inside Opinion

What's on the minds of Tacoma News Tribune editorial writers

NOTICE: Inside Opinion has moved.

With the launch of our new website, we've moved Inside Opinion.
Visit the new section.

Tag: Initiative 960


Legislature decides taxes; voters decide Legislature

This editorial will appear in Friday’s print edition.

Washington does three kinds of democracy: direct, representative and constitutional. Direct democracy came up short in Thursday’s state Supreme Court ruling on taxes; the other two came out ahead.

Several times since 1993, voters have approved initiatives that require a two-thirds supermajority in the Legislature to approve new taxes without a vote of the people. Nearly 64 percent of the electorate went for the last two initiatives, in 2012 and 2010. The 2012 version, I-1185, carried with nearly 1.9 million votes.

This is a partisan issue in the Legislature, where most Democrats want the latitude to collect more taxes for education, social services and public payrolls. Among Washington Republicans, opposition to taxes appears to have become the only unifying principle.

Things don’t break down so neatly in the electorate itself. Washington doesn’t have 1.9 million Republicans. Most independents, presumably, and a lot of Democrats have been voting for those supermajority initiatives. Washingtonians seem quite content to elect Democrats majorities to the House and Senate; they just don’t want to give them any spending money.

Washingtonians won’t be able to have it both ways under the high court’s 6-3 ruling.

The majority opinion, written by Justice Susan Owens, argued that the framers of the Washington Constitution knew what they were doing when they required supermajorities for some decisions – such as overriding a governor’s veto – but simple majorities for others.

If you take the logic of extra-constitutional supermajorities far enough, a problem becomes obvious. What’s to stop, for example, an initiative from demanding a three-quarters majority before taxes can be enacted? Four-fifths?

An initiative could conceivably prevent the Legislature from doing anything at all about taxation – which happens to be one of its core constitutional responsibilities.
Read more »


Tim Eyman follows the money

Tim Eyman may be as aggravating as hell, but he’s not dumb. The guy can spot a potential payday a mile away. How else to explain his rush to be first in line to oppose the raft of tax increases passed by the Legislature this week? As TNT reporter Jordan Schrader reported on Political Buzz, Eyman faxed documents to the Secretary of State just after midnight, before lawmakers had even adjourned.

You’d think Eyman would have enough work on his hands getting the restoration of Initiative 960 – which required a two-thirds vote by legislators to raise taxes –

Read more »


Preserve I-960’s transparency, if nothing else

This editorial will appear in Tuesday’s print edition.

Democrats taking aim at Initiative 960 should fire discriminately. Whether to suspend the initiative’s two-thirds vote requirement during this financial crisis may be up for debate, but I-960’s public disclosure provisions are not.

The state budget is undeniably in a bind. The Legislature faces a $2.6 billion gap between projected revenue and the cost of maintaining existing programs. It also faces a time crunch, with 16 months at most to recoup the money.

Spending cuts should be the first order of business. But barring a big bailout from the feds, the Legislature’s attention will inevitably turn to taxes – and I-960.

Read more »