Inside Opinion

What's on the minds of Tacoma News Tribune editorial writers

NOTICE: Inside Opinion has moved.

With the launch of our new website, we've moved Inside Opinion.
Visit the new section.

Tag: 2010 census

March
8th

Looking for homes in all the wrong places

This editorial will appear in tomorrow’s print edition.

As a reality check on hopes for growth management, the new census numbers are roughly the equivalent of a whack on the head with a two-by-four.

The still-crucial goal of the 1990 Growth Management Act was to channel the state’s expanding populations into areas that were already urbanized or suburbanized. The idea was to protect farmlands, wetlands and critical wildlife habitat – and not so incidentally, the taxpayers’ pocketbooks.

Uncontrolled growth – letting suburban development overrun the countryside in every direction – is a guarantee of wasteful government spending on a stupendous scale.

Orting is a good example. Pierce County and the city’s own officials have allowed it to grow rapidly over the last two decades. The problem is, you can only get to and from the Orting area on a two-lane road – which is now routinely jammed.

Major road and other infrastructure projects siphon fortunes out of the public treasury, fortunes that might be saved if growth were contained to areas that already had roads and other urban infrastructure.

But it’s been obvious for years that the state’s attempts at growth management were in trouble. The 2010 Census shows how much trouble.

The big and middling-sized cities where most newcomers were supposed to live have been growing far more slowly than Puget Sound’s planners hoped for, the census confirms. Lakewood actually shrank over the last decade, as did much of Tacoma.
Read more »

Feb.
25th

Census may throw county a curve

Reader Emelyn McKay of University Place had an interesting question after reading our editorial about legislation that would force Pierce County to go to all-mail voting.

The editorial grudgingly concedes that economic realities make it less feasible to keep the polls open and noted that the county is expecting an additional expense after the 2010 Census results are in: “In 2011 the county likely will have to make election materials available in Korean and Spanish due to growth in those populations.”

McKay asks:

Requirements for citizenship state that applicants must be able to read, write, speak and understand English words in ordinary use. Also, an applicant must demonstrate knowledge of the fundamentals of U.S. history and certain principles of U.S. government. If these qualifications are met, why would a native language ballot be necessary?

I asked Auditor Julie Anderson to respond. Here’s what she had to say: Read more »