Inside Opinion

What's on the minds of Tacoma News Tribune editorial writers

NOTICE: Inside Opinion has moved.

With the launch of our new website, we've moved Inside Opinion.
Visit the new section.

Will the Republican House please join this government?

Post by TNT Editorial Board / The News Tribune on Dec. 25, 2012 at 5:35 pm |
December 26, 2012 3:50 pm

This editorial will appear in Thursday’s print edition.

In Congress, America needs a rational, functional Republican Party. As the fiscal cliff dispute is demonstrating, it doesn’t have one.

For years now, the bickering over the nation’s dangerous deficits has revolved around whether to keep Bush-era tax cuts in place for everyone – the official Republican position – or let them expire only for the wealthiest Americans, as most Democrats favor.

Marginal tax rates for the rich are only part of the nation’s overall deficit problem, but you’d never know it from the noise emanating from the capital. House Republicans and President Obama can’t agree on that question, so they haven’t been able to move on to other necessary action – including averting the “fiscal cliff” that threatens the economy if a slew of tax breaks all expire at once.

Many economists believe America’s increasingly healthy economy would be thrown into recession without at least a short-term budget deal. One number illustrates the threat: According to the respected Tax Policy Center, middle-class households with incomes running from $50,000 to $75,000 would see their taxes jump $2,399 next year, a severe loss of spending power.

Under sequestration – the mutual-assured-destruction pact Republicans and Democrats signed last year – the economy will also be slammed by a barrage of harsh spending cuts. The theory behind sequestration was that the cuts would be so intolerable to everyone, Congress would be forced to do something.

The Republican House majority has now done something. It has collapsed.

A deal appeared in the offing earlier this month. Obama had offered to let the tax cuts expire for Americans with incomes exceeding $400,000 a year (the earlier Democratic talking point had called for $250,000). Majority Leader Boehner countered with an offer to allow the increase to fall on people with incomes exceeding $1 million.

Both positions were drenched with partisan maneuvering and cynical calculation. But they were offers, and thus might have led to counter-offers.

On Thursday, though, Boehner’s standing was sabotaged by the tax cranks of his own caucus. They wouldn’t abide a penny of new taxes, even for Americans making $1 million a year, even to help fix a $16 trillion national debt. Now there’s talk of running an anti-tax purist against him when his position comes up for a vote in January.

Boehner, whatever his faults, is a patriot: He doesn’t want to see the country slide into sinkhole, and he’s willing to bargain with a political adversary to make sure that doesn’t happen.

Many of the Republicans behind him, it appears, want a speaker who merely postures and rants about Obama. That translates into a Republican majority without leadership and without the ability to deal with the duly elected Democratic president and Senate.

If the House majority can’t tolerate even a leader as conservative as Boehner, there are all too many cliffs in America’s future.

*
The News Tribune now uses Facebook commenting on selected blogs. See editor's column for more details. Commenters are expected to abide by terms of service for Facebook as well as commenting rules for thenewstribune.com. Report violators to webmaster@thenewstribune.com.