Inside Opinion

What's on the minds of Tacoma News Tribune editorial writers

NOTICE: Inside Opinion has moved.

With the launch of our new website, we've moved Inside Opinion.
Visit the new section.

Adam Smith on the ‘scary’ prospect of Bush-Cheney officials in a Romney administration

Post by Cheryl Tucker on July 13, 2012 at 5:41 pm with 6 Comments »
July 13, 2012 5:41 pm

Here’s an interesting piece by U.S. Rep. Adam Smith writing for Foreign Policy. It moved on the wire late this afternoon – too late for us to run over the weekend in the print edition. It might get in the paper next week.

Romney’s Embracing Cheney Is a Scary Thing Indeed

By Adam Smith
(c) 2012, Foreign Policy

A large majority of Americans agree that President Barack Obama has a strong record protecting our nation’s security and that he has the right vision for American leadership in the world. Former Massachusetts governor Mitt Romney’s proposals, in contrast, promise to return us to the discredited doctrines and reckless policies of the George W. Bush administration. We’ve seen that movie before, and it doesn’t end well.

That is why it’s particularly worrisome that on Thursday, Romney attended a GOP fundraiser hosted by former Vice President Dick Cheney at his home in Wyoming. It’s fitting, really, since Romney has called Cheney a “person of wisdom and judgment.”

As Romney considers possible running mates, it’s worth remembering that he pointed to Dick Cheney as the “kind of person I’d like to have” working with him. Likewise, the policies that Romney has advocated – like indefinitely leaving our troops in Iraq and Afghanistan, for example – are continuations of the Bush-Cheney doctrine, version 2.0.

It’s no secret that Cheney was the driving force behind the Bush administration’s failed foreign policies: starting the war in Iraq with no plan to finish it, bullying our allies around the world, and watching while Iran and North Korea moved forward with their nuclear programs because the Bush White House couldn’t bring the international community together to confront these threats.

Out of Romney’s 24 special advisors on foreign policy, 17 served in the Bush-Cheney administration. If Romney were to win, it’s likely that many of these people would serve in his administration in some capacity – a frightening prospect given the legacy of this particular group. The last time they were in government, it was disastrous.

For example, one of Romney’s top surrogates on the campaign trail is John Bolton, who served as President George W. Bush’s ambassador to the United Nations. Bolton embodies the reckless neoconservative thinking that was largely responsible for getting us into Iraq under false pretenses. Today, he openly roots for diplomacy with Iran to fail and is all-too-eager to send our men and women in uniform into war. Last year, for instance, Bolton said that, “It would be in our interest to overthrow this regime in Syria.”

The idea of Bolton and other Bush-Cheney officials serving in a Romney administration should be a scary prospect for all Americans.

Critics might object that employing former Bush staffers does not necessarily mean implementing all of their advice. But voters can only judge candidates by what they say they will do if in office, and the recklessness of Dick Cheney is clearly reflected in the foreign policies that Romney has advocated so far on the campaign trail.

Romney supported the invasion of Iraq and opposed ending the war last year. In December, as Obama welcomed home our troops from Iraq after almost nine years of conflict, Romney said, “It is my view that the withdrawal of all of our troops from Iraq is unfortunate. It’s more than unfortunate, I think it’s tragic.” Cheney echoed that sentiment, saying a few months before we ended the war in Iraq that “it would be a real tragedy if we leave too soon before they are ready to fend for themselves.”

On Afghanistan, though Obama and all of our international coalition partners have agreed on a timetable to transfer all security responsibility to Afghan control by the end of 2014, Romney contends that we should stay in Afghanistan indefinitely, with no strategy behind his rhetoric and no plan to bring troops home. Again, Cheney has said that we don’t “need to run for the exits” in Afghanistan.

And Romney, like Cheney, remains stuck in a Cold War mentality. Romney has called Russia our “number one geopolitical foe” – an outlandish statement that stunned foreign policy experts across the political spectrum. When former Secretary of State Colin Powell, who served under President Bush, was asked about Romney’s comments, he replied, “C’mon, Mitt, think. That isn’t the case.”

Romney’s rhetoric toward Moscow has the ring of comments Cheney made in 2008, asserting that Russia posed a “threat of tyranny, economic blackmail and military invasion” to its neighbor, Ukraine.

Obama has demonstrated that he is a strong and coherent leader on foreign policy issues. He kept his promise to end the war in Iraq responsibly. He refocused our efforts on crushing al-Qaida and ordered the bold raid to take out Osama bin Laden. He has repaired our alliances abroad and led the international community in putting the most crippling sanctions on Iran in history. During his tenure, he has also provided more security funding to Israel than any of his predecessors and always stood up for our friend in the international community.

A Romney presidency promises to take us back to something all too familiar: a Bush-Cheney doctrine – equal parts naive and cavalier – which eagerly embraces military force without fully considering the consequences. That “attack now and figure it out later” mindset had disastrous consequences for our country. We can’t afford to go back to the failed policies of the past, not when we’ve come so far and had so much success. America’s security depends on moving forward to confront the threats of the future. That’s what’s at stake in this election.

Rep. Adam Smith, D-Wash., is the ranking member on the House Armed Services Committee.

Leave a comment Comments → 6
  1. lovethemountains says:

    Oh Adam, that is scary. You know what else is scary? Obama could (shudder) be re-elected and continue to surround himself with liberal democrats that follow his direction toward oppressive government interference in the lives of Americans.

  2. BigSwingingRichard says:

    Adam, you DID vote for Obamacare, correct? This is why you should lose the next election.

  3. That is truly funny coming from a Democrat. If one remembers correctly, every nominee that Obama put up had some problem with taxes or other legal thing. Remember “Turbo Tax” Geithner? Now he heads up the money part of government. Smith is just parroting the liberal line.

  4. brett987654321 says:

    ‘Government interference’ according to right wing nut jobs: providing health care to the neediest citizens in society and requiring corporations to not pollute the air and water we all require to live.

    These idiots will however support any measure in the name of ‘security’.

    ‘You want to come in my house while I’m not home and take a look around and then not tell me ever? Well, That’s fine by me, I support the Patriot Act! Just don’t you go fixing my neighbor’s broken arm!’

    Conservatives do not care about Freedom. Their hearts are too full of petty greed and fear to know anything about Freedom.

  5. billybushey says:

    Conservatives chanting “freedom” has come to mean the complete freedom of corporations to engage in endless war, environmental rape, work protection and wage suppression and hatred of brown people. They rant about “Big Government” yet remain absolutely silent on things like the Trans Pacific Partnership, which will allow international corporations to dictate wages, environmental regulations (or lack thereof) international trade, labor organization and on and on, right here on US soil and in defiance of any Congressional or other regulatory law or effort. They rage against an alleged UN take-away of “gun rights” while insuring that US arms manufactures can continue to profit from international wholesale slaughter.
    Health care? Worker Protection? Middle class wages? Fugedaboudit! All it takes to get these mindless foot soldiers to fall in line is to promise that, in return for their dignity, real freedom, health and lasting security, they will accept a nice shiny gun and free Hank Williams/Ted Nugent tickets.

  6. klthompson says:

    Good grief! This is a joke, isn’t it?

We welcome comments. Please keep them civil, short and to the point. ALL CAPS, spam, obscene, profane, abusive and off topic comments will be deleted. Repeat offenders will be blocked. Thanks for taking part and abiding by these simple rules.

JavaScript is required to post comments.

Follow the comments on this post with RSS 2.0