Inside Opinion

What's on the minds of Tacoma News Tribune editorial writers

NOTICE: Inside Opinion has moved.

With the launch of our new website, we've moved Inside Opinion.
Visit the new section.

Liquor prices didn’t drop? That shouldn’t be a surprise

Post by TNT Editorial Board / The News Tribune on June 4, 2012 at 5:29 pm with 4 Comments »
June 4, 2012 4:52 pm

This editorial will appear in Tuesday’s print edition.

Many shoppers checking out the prices of liquor stocked at supermarkets and other outlets seem to be confused. They don’t understand why they’re paying at least as much for most items as before privatization took effect on Friday and, in some cases, more.

Presumably at least some of those shoppers helped pass Initiative 1183 last November to privatize liquor sales. Even though that initiative was written and promoted at high cost by Costco – which spent more than $22 million getting it passed – many folks seem to think the higher costs were imposed by “the state” or “the Legislature,” even “the governor.”

No, the voters are responsible for those higher costs. That’s what they voted for when they marked “yes” on I-1183.

Preserving revenue that allows the state and local government to enforce liquor laws at thousands of new points of sale was written into I-1183 in order to get voter support.
Earlier privatization efforts failed in large part because they would have stripped away public safety funding and so were bitterly fought by law enforcement and local governments.

Many responsible for public safety still opposed I-1183 because they recognized the inherent danger in thousands of new outlets selling hard liquor, virtually around the clock. But others, seeing that their funding would not be cut, either stayed silent or were supportive of the ballot measure.

Not helping matters is the labeling used by stores that sell liquor. They show the before-tax price and the price “that includes state taxes,” not “that includes taxes preserved by voter-approved I-1183 as well as this store’s profit.”

Shoppers upset that they’re not getting the cheap booze they thought they were voting for were not paying attention. Opponents of I-1183 pointed out that higher prices were the inevitable result of preserving public safety funding plus making a profit for private sellers.

Now there’s talk of another initiative to strip away the liquor taxes. That would create the perfect storm: Cheap, readily accessible liquor with little funding for enforcing violations and dealing with the aftermath of more drunk driving, underage drinking and deadly accidents.

Approving that would only be compounding the mistake voters made when they voted for I-1183.

Leave a comment Comments → 4
  1. Tummler says:

    So if cheap booze is bad then I-1183 was a good thing and we should keep it? Seriously though, isn’t possible that people voted for I-1183 knowing full well that it might be a little bit more expensive but the convenience of doing one-stop shopping balanced it out for them. Maybe people voted I-1183 in on principle and figured that since now that the state stores are out of the way they can tweak the law and taxes later on. No matter, I for one am just glad to see trade freeing up, even if it is for something TNT finds detestable.

  2. stumpy567 says:

    It’s the “Preserving Revenue to enforce Liquor Laws” portion of this bill that bloats the cost of spirits. As usual, The state knuckleheads cannot accept the fact that private enterprise is always more cost efficient and have “preserved” themselves a little “revenue” to fund the LCB.
    States where spirits are much less expensive because of lower taxes have no more liquor related issues than Washington State.

  3. LOL. Do you really think mommy Gregoire and the party in power in Olympia (Democrats) would allow the voters to remove a tax from their feed troughs? If the voters tried to remove the liquor tax or any other tax they would be labeled “uninformed” and the initiative would be overturned.

  4. Lol, I think its funny all these juice heads thought they’d be getting cheaper booze if they took it away from the evil govt and gave it to Costco.

    You learned something did you. You learned that private industry can be just as corrupt and the government.

    Next time read before you vote. You got snookered, or do I mean schnokered, on this one.

We welcome comments. Please keep them civil, short and to the point. ALL CAPS, spam, obscene, profane, abusive and off topic comments will be deleted. Repeat offenders will be blocked. Thanks for taking part and abiding by these simple rules.

JavaScript is required to post comments.

Follow the comments on this post with RSS 2.0