Inside Opinion

What's on the minds of Tacoma News Tribune editorial writers

NOTICE: Inside Opinion has moved.

With the launch of our new website, we've moved Inside Opinion.
Visit the new section.

Click ads at odds with residents’ anti-billboard fervor

Post by TNT Editorial Board / The News Tribune on May 29, 2012 at 5:30 pm with 3 Comments »
May 29, 2012 5:10 pm

This editorial will appear in Wednesday’s print edition.

For many Tacomans, big billboards are anathema, a blight on the city. At packed meetings, residents pleaded with city officials to continue fighting the major billboard company, Clear Channel Outdoor, which wants to replace its static signs with digital ones that change the message on a regular basis.

So what about all that makes Tacoma Public Utilities officials think that the public would be happy about advertising its city-owned Click Network on billboards?

In December – four months after the City Council voted to update its outdoor sign ordinance by banning digital signs and getting rid of 190 nonconforming ones – Click contracted with Clear Channel to advertise on many of those same nonconforming signs. Its one-year contract funnels $105,415 to Clear Channel for at least 13 billboards and accompanying production costs.

For budgetary reasons, the city isn’t enforcing its tough new sign ordinance. Clear Channel has threatened to wage an expensive court battle, and City Manager T.C. Broadnax doesn’t want to incur those costs until after the end of the year, if then.

Even so, the law is on the books and public sentiment is more than clear. So Click’s decision to proceed with the contract is baffling – especially when it benefits a company that has shown its contempt for residents’ wishes and its willingness to wage a scorched-earth legal battle to have its way.

Metro Parks also advertises on Clear Channel billboards – and that, too, is an unwelcome choice. But at least the park district is a separate, distinct entity and not a part of municipal government like TPU.

Click Network is a business, but it is also a city asset, one owned by the citizens of Tacoma. As such, its advertising budget would be better spent on other marketing vehicles – ones not at odds with city law and its long-term interests.

Click has done other forms of advertising but decided that billboards would be more effective. Even if that is true, and could be measured in some way, that decision doesn’t take into account residents’ antipathy to billboards, especially the large nonconforming ones. Just because Click can advertise on billboards doesn’t mean it should.

Leave a comment Comments → 3
  1. packer64 says:

    I think it is ironic that the newspaper is protesting the local cable company buying billboard ads in part because the newspaper doesn’t believe billboard ads are effective as “other forms of advertising”. Is the Tribune and their corporate owners, hit hard by a steady decline in advertising revenues, more concerned with the 13 billboards used by Click! (out of 190 owned by Clear Channel in the city) or with the fact that Click! won’t advertise in the newspaper?

  2. Cheryl Tucker says:

    I wrote the editorial, and that thought didn’t cross my mind. I have no idea whether or not Click advertises in The News Tribune.

    We have long been supportive of tough outdoor advertising restrictions because we consider billboards to be blights and the new digital ones to be even worse. Our editorials on this go back many years, starting with the ones along I-5 on property owned by tribal members.

  3. olympicmtn says:

    Cheryl says that billboards are blights. Then when I see a crime stopper ad on the billboards I should protest crime stoppers? The humane society ads? I presume you agree that every political yard sign is visual trash “blight” as proclaimed by Julie Anderson queen of campaign signs.

*
We welcome comments. Please keep them civil, short and to the point. ALL CAPS, spam, obscene, profane, abusive and off topic comments will be deleted. Repeat offenders will be blocked. Thanks for taking part and abiding by these simple rules.

JavaScript is required to post comments.

Follow the comments on this post with RSS 2.0