Inside Opinion

What's on the minds of Tacoma News Tribune editorial writers

NOTICE: Inside Opinion has moved.

With the launch of our new website, we've moved Inside Opinion.
Visit the new section.

School reform can’t wait for a booming economy

Post by TNT Editorial Board / The News Tribune on Jan. 13, 2012 at 7:44 pm with 4 Comments »
January 13, 2012 6:47 pm

This editorial will appear in tomorrow’s print edition.

The middle of an economic crisis is not the time to stop fixing public education. On the contrary.

A legislative push for new school reforms – including charter schools and greater teacher accountability – met with instant resistance this week from the usual suspects.

Singling out the bill to authorize a handful of charters – which are oddly easy to demonize in this state – the Washington Education Association issued a statement describing the measure as a “distraction from the real debate.” The real debate, naturally, is about pumping billions of dollars the state doesn’t have into a K-12 system that doesn’t work well enough.

Charter public schools are hardly the most important reform out there, but they do serve as a barometer of a state’s willingness to give every possible option to parents and children.

The highly motivated educators who typically launch charter schools sign a contract – the charter – that commits them to meet specified standards and gives them leeway to reach those goals.

These schools are hardly novelties anymore; they are legal in most states and common in many. Most of the public schools in New Orleans are chartered now. Across the nation, they routinely enroll disadvantaged students who are trapped in low-performing districts and don’t have the money for private academies.

One nice thing about charter schools is that their charters can be revoked – quickly – if they don’t deliver on their promises. Traditional schools are not bound by contracts; when they fail, they are too often allowed to go on failing and failing.

Charter schools are hardly a panacea. Washington could have a fantastic public education system without them. The problem is, it has neither. It has an inexcusably high dropout rate, especially among blacks and Latinos. It also has a miserable record of getting high school graduates into the college and technical training they need to succeed in the job market.

The WEA and other members of the old guard talk as if trainloads of cash would fix everything. In fact, pouring fortunes into the status quo would reinforce failure.

Washington’s schools do need better funding – but their need for better thinking is more fundamental and more urgent. Especially when money is tight and every possible advantage must be wrung out of every precious dollar.

The schools need a bundle of reforms. Principals and teachers need better evaluations and more accountability. Measures of student improvement based on objective performance data must be part of that accountability.

Students shouldn’t be falling into a chasm between the public schools and higher education – the two systems should be integrated. Educational experiments – including hybrids of classroom and Web learning – should be more common, not less.

It should be far easier to remove from schools the small minority of teachers who can’t effectively teach. Ability, not seniority, should drive layoff and assignment decisions.

These are all more important than charter schools. But a K-12 establishment that won’t tolerate a single charter school – not one – is never going to tackle the genuinely hard stuff.

Leave a comment Comments → 4
  1. ainsworth29 says:

    Oh dear. You are going to get an earful tomorrow for this editorial. Surprisingly, I find it spot on.

  2. sherryerdmann says:

    The effectiveness of online education such as High Speed Universities depends on the learner. If you want to learn, you learn. If you don’t, you can cram or cheat

  3. I suggest we install cameras in all the classrooms. Let the public view the videos at the school district office so folks can see for themselves what is going on.

    I would allow a few citizens to volunteer to be in on the a evaluation process.

  4. Sarajane46th says:

    Apparently you haven’t done your homework. A Stanford University study shows that only 17% of charter schools outperform their public school counterparts, while 37% of them perform worse. If you were a parent–even one desperate for a better school–are these odds you would submit your child to?

    Charter schools were originally a laboratory for experimenting with alternatives that could be generalized to the school system as a whole. Creating a system of lottery winners and losers doesn’t translate to the school system. Neither does forcing the teachers to work a longer school day and Saturday hours. These things cost more money, as do full-day kindergarten and quality pre-school, demonstrated to be the best education investments we can make.

    The for-profit competitive model is not what’s wanted. (I am not a teacher nor associated with the WEA.) Let’s give our 2011 innovation schools bill time to work. Charter schools cannot possibly be a goal, but are a tool, as the LEV says. They don’t address poverty, which is the key indicator of student failure. We need other, better tools for addressing the achievement gap.

*
We welcome comments. Please keep them civil, short and to the point. ALL CAPS, spam, obscene, profane, abusive and off topic comments will be deleted. Repeat offenders will be blocked. Thanks for taking part and abiding by these simple rules.

JavaScript is required to post comments.

Follow the comments on this post with RSS 2.0