Inside Opinion

What's on the minds of Tacoma News Tribune editorial writers

NOTICE: Inside Opinion has moved.

With the launch of our new website, we've moved Inside Opinion.
Visit the new section.

A test of humanity for Washington’s Legislature

Post by TNT Editorial Board / The News Tribune on Sep. 28, 2011 at 6:54 pm with 3 Comments »
September 28, 2011 9:56 am

This editorial will appear in Thursday’s print edition.

The impact of Washington’s looming $2 billion shortfall is coming into focus, and it is ugly indeed.

Prepping for an emergency legislative budgeting session in November, Gov. Chris Gregoire has asked her department chiefs to tell her what a 10 percent loss of funding would mean for the people their agencies serve.

Susan Dreyfus, secretary of the Department of Social and Health Services, released three scenarios this week. The first scenario includes cuts backed by some kind of logic, however tenuous.

Example: Eliminating beds for 150 patients at Western State Hospital in Lakewood, including people with dementia, traumatic brain injury and histories of violent behavior.

It costs $560 a day to house someone at Western State, which means a lot of money could be saved by placing them elsewhere. But people don’t wind up at Western State by accident; they go there because they have major problems.

James Robinson, a counselor and union president at the hospital, says, “If some of these patients go to a nursing home, they’re going to kill those people.” Those are the words of a labor leader out to protect hospital jobs, but the warning shouldn’t be dismissed lightly.

To make the plan work, DSHS would have to aggressively create and fund community homes that can handle such patients at a lower cost. Those homes don’t exist now, but the idea at least sounds doable.

But consider what DSHS and the state Health Care Authority might have to eliminate under the worst-case scenario:

• Care for 80,000 incapacitated citizens, including the mentally ill and the developmentally disabled.

• Domestic violence intervention that helps protect 4,500 children.

• The entire Basic Health Plan, whose loss would end medical coverage for 36,000 of the working poor.

• Health insurance for thousands of mentally ill and homeless Washingtonians.

• Assistance for 54,000 women with high-risk pregnancies.

A 10 percent cut at DSHS translates into $573 million in the current biennium, which runs through the middle of 2013. But state spending on social welfare is often matched by Congress. Under the 10 percent scenario, the state would forfeit about $300 million in federal funds. The total loss would be nearly $900 million.

There’s no obvious way to protect some of these endangered groups. DSHS’ budget has already been pared back by $2.2 billion, and its staff and management have been reduced despite growing caseloads. Good alternatives don’t exist within the agency, and the usual path of least political resistance – robbing higher education – is also abhorrent.

Nov. 28, the likely date of the special session, will confront the Legislature with one of the greatest challenges it has ever faced.

Leave a comment Comments → 3
  1. tree_guy says:

    “Susan Dreyfus, secretary of the Department of Social and Health Services, released three scenarios this week.”

    Well, she needs to release a fourth “scenerio.”

    The fourth scenerio is to decertify the unions representing these state workers or otherwise reduce the rate of pay for the affected workers. Once we get better control of employee costs we will be better able to conform service levels to general economic conditions.

  2. Would be interesting to go back and pull up all the quotes from Tim Eyman who mocked the predictions of dire consequences if his tax cut initiatives pass. Contrary to his claims, the sky fell.

  3. tree_guy says:

    Major test of humanity…yet plenty of money for the governor and her delegation to flit over to Paris and sleep in $500+ night rooms. I guess the governors lavish lifestyle really is more important than that of the poor people in Washington.

    Derekyoung@ why don’t you publish some of the “quotes from Tim Eyman” that you speak of? Do you really expect everyone who reads your comment to perform this research? You’re smarter than that.

*
We welcome comments. Please keep them civil, short and to the point. ALL CAPS, spam, obscene, profane, abusive and off topic comments will be deleted. Repeat offenders will be blocked. Thanks for taking part and abiding by these simple rules.

JavaScript is required to post comments.

Follow the comments on this post with RSS 2.0