Inside Opinion

What's on the minds of Tacoma News Tribune editorial writers

NOTICE: Inside Opinion has moved.

With the launch of our new website, we've moved Inside Opinion.
Visit the new section.

Selling UP Town Center doesn’t come cheap

Post by Kim Bradford on May 31, 2011 at 8:22 pm with 3 Comments »
May 31, 2011 8:22 pm

This editorial will appear in Wednesday’s print edition.

The City of University Place has spent, on average, $42,000 a year on travel to market Town Center over the past five years.

Is that an unreasonable expense for a property owner pitching a $250 million development with the potential to permanently expand the city’s tax base and give it the central town square it’s never had?

No. Had the city not invested the money, critics might rightfully charge that University Place hadn’t done enough to secure the project’s success.

The better question is: Did the right people take the trips to woo retailers, sketch out the shopping center’s look and lobby for federal money?

Specifically, did University Place need to send large delegations of city staff and elected officials to industry conventions and design meetings? Nearby cities have been able to map out their developments by sending a couple of key people – or, in some instances, just their developers.

University Place’s hands-on approach is a likely consequence of Town Center’s unique history, which has been beset by bad timing and vocal opposition almost from the get-go.

City officials leveraged the city’s financial health on the bet that they could lure upscale retail to Bridgeport Way West. It was an ambitious endeavor even before the recession hit, and it has seemed more Herculean with each passing year.

Undoubtedly, that is one reason behind the large entourages. City leaders are personally invested in vindicating their decision and ensuring that the gamble eventually pays off.

Face-to-face meetings have succeeded in one respect. The city secured $8 million in federal grants, in part by spending $32,000 to make several trips to Washington, D.C., to lobby federal officials. That’s a healthy return on investment.

But University Place officials appear to have gradually rethought their approach, whether by choice or fiscal necessity. Most of the $212,000 tab for travel came during the early years of marketing the development.

Lately, as the city has exhausted the list of potential contacts and changed directions on selling the property, it has scaled back travel.

This spring, for the first time in five years, no city official went to a prominent retail real estate gathering in Las Vegas. Instead, the city’s private broker went on his own dime.

Delegating the job to professionals is probably the better – although not always cheaper – course. But while University Place officials might have sent others in their stead, it’s hard to make a case that their travel bill was exorbitant given the stakes.

A $400 New York City hotel room didn’t put the city in a budget bind. The $40 million debt for Town Center did, and city officials would be remiss if they weren’t spending some money to try to work their way out from under that albatross.

Sneak preview
Leave a comment Comments → 3
  1. jimkingjr says:

    One reason the federal government is in the deep hole it is in is its propensity to waste $8 million on UP’s white elephant. Just what exactly justifies federal money in projects like this?

  2. steilacoomtaxpayer says:

    Jim, what exactly justifies anybodies money in this? Toy city, gov’t insulated from economic reality, that got it started. UP people really got hosed by the whole…..thing.

  3. jimkingjr says:

    Have I ever suggested anything about this project was justified? But UP people elected the council, and get what they voted for. The rest of us shouldn’t subsidize this, and the feds need to get out of funding local projects. Andy Jackson had it right…

We welcome comments. Please keep them civil, short and to the point. ALL CAPS, spam, obscene, profane, abusive and off topic comments will be deleted. Repeat offenders will be blocked. Thanks for taking part and abiding by these simple rules.

JavaScript is required to post comments.

Follow the comments on this post with RSS 2.0