Inside Opinion

What's on the minds of Tacoma News Tribune editorial writers

NOTICE: Inside Opinion has moved.

With the launch of our new website, we've moved Inside Opinion.
Visit the new section.

Presidential primary: One cut that won’t hurt

Post by Cheryl Tucker on Dec. 16, 2010 at 7:38 pm with 4 Comments »
December 17, 2010 9:25 am

This editorial will appear in Friday’s print edition.

Many of Gov. Chris Gregoire’s proposed state budget cuts will inflict real pain and hardship on Washington citizens, including its most vulnerable – low-income children and the elderly.

But the recommendation to save $10 million by suspending the state’s presidential primary in 2012 isn’t one that will hurt very much, if at all.

The primary is largely ceremonial in nature, with state Democrats ignoring its results and using lightly attended caucus meetings to pick their delegates to the national nominating convention. State Republicans use the results to select half of their delegates.

This state’s primary hasn’t always been successful in drawing the candidates here on the campaign trail. For instance, Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton fiercely battled for the 2008 Democratic nomination, yet neither visited Washington.
And it’s not as if this would be the first time the primary was suspended to save money; it happened previously in 2004 when the estimated cost was $6 million.

The value of the primary lies mainly in engaging citizens in the political process in a more democratic way than the caucuses, which are dominated by the party faithful.

Caucuses are also vulnerable to being hijacked by highly motivated activists – as happened when TV evangelist Pat Robertson won the state Republican caucus vote in 1988 over then Vice President George H.W. Bush. In fact, that fiasco led to the creation of the presidential primary in this state in 1989, when lawmakers approved an initiative to the Legislature.
A voter who can’t attend a caucus meeting for one reason or another – work, illness, disability or being stationed abroad with the military, for instance – has little voice in which candidate is nominated. The 2008 primary drew nearly 1.4 million voters, more than 10 times the number estimated to have attended the caucuses.

Canceling the primary for the second time in eight years doesn’t bode well for its future. And 2012 could see a lively campaign for the Republican nomination that state voters would miss out on.

If both parties abided by primary voters’ decisions in the nominating process, there’d be an argument for sparing it. But given its irrelevance, suspending it in 2012 makes sense.

Leave a comment Comments → 4
  1. About time the primary goes — what a waste of money!!!

  2. What? Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton both visited Washington. Obama spoke to an enormous crowd in Seattle on the same day that Hillary spoke at the UPS field house (I was there for that one.)

    I agree with you that cutting the primary won’t hurt, this time around, but geez it was only 2 years ago and kind of a big news story at the time.

  3. Cheryl Tucker says:


    re: What? Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton both visited Washington. Obama spoke to an enormous crowd in Seattle on the same day that Hillary spoke at the UPS field house (I was there for that one.)

    You’re right….I read that statement in another publication and a search of our own archives didn’t turn up the visits. (I must not have used the right keywords.) I should have remembered the Clinton visit at UPS; my sister went and told me all about it!

    Anyway, we’ll run a correction. Thanks for the heads up.

  4. mattersnot1 says:

    I agree and we need to get rid of all the special elections too.

We welcome comments. Please keep them civil, short and to the point. ALL CAPS, spam, obscene, profane, abusive and off topic comments will be deleted. Repeat offenders will be blocked. Thanks for taking part and abiding by these simple rules.

JavaScript is required to post comments.

Follow the comments on this post with RSS 2.0