Inside Opinion

What's on the minds of Tacoma News Tribune editorial writers

NOTICE: Inside Opinion has moved.

With the launch of our new website, we've moved Inside Opinion.
Visit the new section.

Smoking deaths are ugly; cigarette labels should be, too

Post by Cheryl Tucker on Nov. 16, 2010 at 7:36 pm with 3 Comments »
November 16, 2010 4:57 pm
One of the Food and Drug Administration’s proposed new cigarette warning labels depicts a cancer victim smoking through a tracheostomy tube in his throat. (FDA)

This editorial will appear in Wednesday’s print edition.

It’s all too easy for smokers to ignore the Surgeon General’s small “hazardous to your health” warning on cigarette packs. That won’t be the case much longer.

Under new Food and Drug Administration rules scheduled to go into effect in 2012, graphic color photos and drawings depicting the negative consequences of smoking will take up half of the front and back of each pack as well as 20 percent of cigarette advertising.

Anyone who’s bought cigarettes in Canada or one of 30 other countries won’t be startled by the more in-your-face warnings; they’ve been required there for years. While some of the FDA’s warning images are strong, they’re not nearly as cringe-inducing as many of the ones required on foreign labels.

Research in other countries supports the effectiveness of strong warning labels in getting smokers to consider quitting. In the U.S., the most effective measures have included smoking restrictions at work and in public places as well as steep increases in tobacco taxes. Since 1970, the cost of an average pack in the United States has risen from 38 cents to $5.33. During that same period, the percentage of Americans smoking has dropped from 40 percent to about 20 percent.

Still, that’s 46 million people taking part in the greatest single preventable cause of death and the No. 1 threat to public health. At least a third of smokers – about 443,000 annually – will die prematurely because of their habit.
While impressive progress has been made in lowering the smoking rate, the numbers have leveled off. And sadly, teen smoking rates almost exactly mirror the 20 percent of adult Americans who smoke.

So more aggressive tactics are called for. If graphic labels – which are costly only to the manufacturers who have to redesign their packages – can get those rates even a little lower, then they should be used. And the ickier the better.
Death by smoking isn’t pretty. Cigarette packages shouldn’t be either. Bring on the diseased mouths and toe-tagged corpses.

On the Web
To see the Food & Drug Administration’s images proposed for U.S. cigarette package warning labels, click here.

Leave a comment Comments → 3
  1. Power hungry busybodies, all of them. Complete hypocrites.

    46 million people paying billions in taxes – every year. 443,000 prematurely saving millions in healthcare costs – every year.

    Now just what is there for all the little facists to complain about? The people they don’t like anyway are getting out of their hair sooner. In the process, those early departure people are paying tons of taxes that would have to be replaced by the facists themselves if all smokers stopped smoking.

    This is not a public health issue. It might be a public funding issue except that many studies have shown that smokers rarely access public funds for healthcare.

    But carry on with your self-righteous behavior. You feel good about yourselves and that’s all that matters, right?

  2. “46 million people paying billions in taxes – every year. 443,000 prematurely saving millions in healthcare costs – every year.”

    You forgot the savings in Social Security.

    “This is not a public health issue.”

    It’s a public health issue in that it meets the public goal of helping folks live longer, disease free.

    However, if folks are not working, such as in retirement, then keeping them alive longer is going to be very expensive as you have stated.

    So if we are going have folks live longer by not smoking, we need to find something productive for them to do.

    “But carry on with your self-righteous behavior. You feel good about yourselves and that’s all that matters, right?”

    Well it’s a bit more than that. Some folks do have love ones who just want them around a bit longer. Children of smokers don’t have much a choice as to whether or not to breath cigarette smoke. Plus, many low income folks spend money on cigarettes that endangers their family’s financial security.

    However, I think you do make some good economic points.

  3. omega629 says:

    If people are stupid enough to smoke, let them. A few less stupid (and smelly) people in this world is what we need.

*
We welcome comments. Please keep them civil, short and to the point. ALL CAPS, spam, obscene, profane, abusive and off topic comments will be deleted. Repeat offenders will be blocked. Thanks for taking part and abiding by these simple rules.

JavaScript is required to post comments.

Follow the comments on this post with RSS 2.0