Inside Opinion

What's on the minds of Tacoma News Tribune editorial writers

NOTICE: Inside Opinion has moved.

With the launch of our new website, we've moved Inside Opinion.
Visit the new section.

Tough conclusions about race and crime

Post by Patrick O'Callahan on Oct. 29, 2010 at 4:35 pm with 2 Comments »
October 29, 2010 5:25 pm

State Supreme Court justices Richard Sanders and Jim Johnson sailed into a squall a couple weeks ago when they disputed claims that racism explains the disproportionate rate of black imprisonment. The remarks prompted the Seattle Times to withdraw its endorsement of Sanders’ re-election almost as fast as NPR fired Juan Williams.

We wound up editorializing that a single-minded focus on racism can obscure more concrete problems, such as poverty and lack of legal representation, that might have concrete solutions. Centuries of institutional racism – especially slavery and Jim Crow – may have created the problem, but remedies must be found in the here-and-now.

The most ferocious challenge to the racism-only paradigm I’ve run into comes from Heather MacDonald of the conservative Manhattan Institute, who published a statistically dense rebuttal in the Spring 2008 issue of City Journal. Some of her points:

• Criminals strongly tend to be fingered by victims of the same race.

• Multiple studies by liberal scholars have found that conviction rates are driven by actual crimes, not bias.

• The disparity in federal penalties for crack and cocaine possession, sometimes cited as a factor in disparate racial imprisonment rates, has an almost negligible effect. In any event, black leaders originally called for the crackdown on crack: “It takes shameless sleight of hand to turn an effort to protect blacks into a conspiracy against them.”

• Drug enforcement in general accounts for only half a percentage point of the rate of black imprisonment.

• It takes some doing to get into prison in the first place: “In the overwhelming majority of cases, whatever the race of the convicted, prison remains what it has always been: a lifetime achievement award for persistence in criminal offending. Absent recidivism or a violent crime, the criminal-justice system will do everything it can to keep you out of the state or federal slammer.”

I’m not vouching for her conclusions, some of which lend aid and comfort to a brand of politics I don’t like, but I’ve yet to find a persuasive response to her analysis.

Leave a comment Comments → 2
  1. gowenray says:

    You are making a very good point Mr. Callahan. The tired excuses that recism is the dominate reason for disparity within the criminal justice system is pure bunk.
    The courts of law and the criminal justice system is this country were designed to afford access and fairness. The critics who sound off about it lacking that seem to have two commonalities. A criticism that sppeals to emotional dilemma and, no compairson with another system, anywhere in the world, that offers better.

  2. So why aren’t you vouching for her conclusions, since you find them convincing?

    And, an aside like “lending aid and comfort” is inappropriate. It implies volition while insinuating bias, doing neither honestly.

    Why is it so difficult for the media to cede that MacDonald does her work because she is committed to constructive outcomes for offenders as well as victims, an assumption automatically attached to every criminologist on the opposite side of the debate?

    The most reliable way to get murdered in this country is to engage in criminal activity. The lives salvaged and saved through incarceration are not only innocent victims’.

    People who resist facts because they find emotional narratives more satisfying do real harm when their myths and fantasies steer crime policy. They are the ones whose “brand of politics” should scrutinized, not someone who has already proffered a solid and compelling case. But I’m not holding my breath. The media is too saturated with fantastical ideas about crime and punishment to give up their favored themes.

*
We welcome comments. Please keep them civil, short and to the point. ALL CAPS, spam, obscene, profane, abusive and off topic comments will be deleted. Repeat offenders will be blocked. Thanks for taking part and abiding by these simple rules.

JavaScript is required to post comments.

Follow the comments on this post with RSS 2.0