Inside Opinion

What's on the minds of Tacoma News Tribune editorial writers

NOTICE: Inside Opinion has moved.

With the launch of our new website, we've moved Inside Opinion.
Visit the new section.

America pays dearly for Afghan war crimes

Post by Patrick O'Callahan on Aug. 25, 2010 at 7:52 pm with 3 Comments »
August 25, 2010 6:24 pm

This editorial will appear in tomorrow’s print edition.

For Americans, there’s actually a positive side to the murder charges pending against five Lewis- McChord soldiers.

Five is a minuscule fraction of the 4,000 members of the 5th Stryker Brigade, which came home this summer after a year’s deployment in Afghanistan. Atrocities happen in every war, but today’s professional all-volunteer American Army today may be as scrupulous a combat force as this nation has ever fielded.

There’s also the fact that the probe of the suspicious deaths of three Afghan civilians earlier this year was initiated by the brigade itself against several of its own. In the past – after Vietnam’s My Lai massacre, for example – investigations often happened despite the unit’s commanders, not because of them.

So – some good news inside the bad.

Unfortunately, the Afghan people – the people whose attitudes will determine whether America succeeds or fails in Afghanistan – may not pick up on these nuances.

The allegations are shocking. According to Army prosecutors, the five soldiers, including a staff sergeant, participated directly or indirectly in the deliberate killing of the three Afghan men, who appear to have been targeted at random. If the charges are true, the responsible soldiers appear to have killed the three men more or less for sport, on the assumption they could get away with it under the cover of wartime.

They are entitled to the presumption of innocence. Due process often casts an entirely different light on seemingly incriminating facts. The point is that any such atrocity in Afghanistan can fatally undermine the U.S. mission there. The Taliban will inevitably prevail in that country if enough of its people view the United States and its local allies as enemies. Any American who commits a crime against an Afghan noncombatant betrays America itself.

The Abu Ghraib scandal showed how this works. Photographs of U.S. soldiers humiliating and degrading prisoners held in the Baghdad prison – most of them probably innocent of any crime – inflamed the Middle East.

Extremists used them as “proof” that American soldiers in Iraq were callous, Muslim-hating conquerors. The photos helped recruit young Middle Easterners to fight against U.S. forces. The Americans behind the abuses in Abu Ghraib may have been responsible for as many U.S. deaths as any Iraqi insurgent commander.

Hence the importance of the case against the five JBLM soldiers. If they are innocent and there’s another plausible explanation for the three Afghans’ deaths, the facts must be dug out and broadcast to the world. If the accused soldiers – or some of them – did commit murder, the world must see the United States willingly hold its own troops accountable.

All military forces have their sociopaths. A corrupt army promotes them; an honorable army convicts them. We can only hope the people of Afghanistan can see the difference.

Leave a comment Comments → 3
  1. DrewHendricks says:

    “Any American who commits a crime against an Afghan noncombatant betrays America itself.”

    Too true, but you forget to mention that serving in an occupation of a country which had not attacked the United States is itself a war crime, and being in that country at all makes all 4,000 5/2 Stryker soldiers into war criminals.

    Afghanistan, even if you assume that Osama Bin Laden was based there during the attacks on 9-11-01, as a nation did not attack the US and offered to consider proof of Osama Bin Laden’s crimes. Instead, the US went to war against a county for the actions of an individual and his minions.

    This would be like the US being invaded by Britain because US privateers had taken British merchant ships in the Atlantic.

    The vast majority of the 9/11 hijackers came from Saudi Arabia, and there is legitimate evidence that they had inside help (to put it mildly).

    The prosecution of 5, or even 15 Stryker soldiers is just a smoke screen for the real war crime, which is ongoing today.

  2. Patrick O'Callahan says:

    Privateers are an odd choice to support this argument. Privateers like Francis Drake were licensed by their governments to attack the shipping of other countries. Attacks by privateers (including American privateers against British merchantmen) were internationally recognized acts of warfare.

    The parallel to Afghanistan is excellent, though. When the Taliban provided safe haven to al-Qaida and allowed it to operate terrorist training camps – a matter of record – it effectively licensed Osama and his friends to stage attacks on the United States and other countries.

    Clear act of war. That’s why there was broad international support for the U.S. and NATO intervention in Afghanistan in 2001. The U.N. Security Council authorized a six-month international military operation in Afghanistan that year when it passed Resolution 1386, which is about as close as the Security Council ever gets to putting its stamp of approval on an invasion.

  3. Interesting discussion. Ron Paul and our own Clint Didier actually proposed issuing letters of marque which are specifically authorized to Congress by Constitution. The idea being we set loose our own “privateers” on these new age pirates. I think it’s a little daffy but that’s probably why Didier got 12% of the vote.

*
We welcome comments. Please keep them civil, short and to the point. ALL CAPS, spam, obscene, profane, abusive and off topic comments will be deleted. Repeat offenders will be blocked. Thanks for taking part and abiding by these simple rules.

JavaScript is required to post comments.

Follow the comments on this post with RSS 2.0