Inside Opinion

What's on the minds of Tacoma News Tribune editorial writers

NOTICE: Inside Opinion has moved.

With the launch of our new website, we've moved Inside Opinion.
Visit the new section.

Mike Lonergan to council: Don’t rush to judgment about Arizona

Post by Patrick O'Callahan on May 24, 2010 at 2:12 pm with 7 Comments »
May 25, 2010 9:47 am

Mike Lonergan may have left the Tacoma City Council, but he’s still got a lot to say about city affairs. Here’s some advice he emailed Sunday to the current council:

I’m just one of 208,000 residents of Tacoma now, but I do have a different perspective because of my recent Council work. So here goes:

It is important to restoring confidence that our City government is responsive to the citizens of Tacoma that you do not move to reconsider the Resolution condemning Arizona’s recent legislation on Tuesday. Instead, Council Member Boe was exactly right when he said that this deserves more study and specific recommendations as it relates to Tacoma, with no need even to mention Arizona.

Because the Resolution specifically concludes as a fact that the Arizona law violates the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, I looked up the amendment. I assume that Council Members supporting the Resolution also do so. (Ironically, the Amendment, passed after the Civil War, deal primarily with recognizing the rights of citizens, both born and properly naturalized.) Upon what basis (i..e. whose legal opinion) is this serious allegation stated as fact in an official document of the City of Tacoma?

What policies or laws will aid the Tacoma Police in doing the job of protecting the citizens of Tacoma? What is the current extent and effect of employment and provision of social services to undocumented people in Tacoma, and what changes, if any, should be made to the City’s policies and laws? These are the questions that should be answered using the established Commitee system of the Council before any vote is taken.

The topic of the Resolution should be referred to the Public Safety, Human Services and Education Committee, for due research, staff reporting, deliberation, and possibly a do-pass recommendation for legislation. A motion to that effect by the Deputy Mayor could be made and unanimously approved on Tuesday night. I believe it could be done before public comment, since the item is not now on the agenda, thus eliminating the need for a repetition of last week’s testimony, and possibly much additional testimony. There is no need to further polarize the community,

In recent years, many items of review and consideration by Council Committees have been brought as a result of actions in other jurisdictions. The focus has been to see how the matter affects our City, not to pass judgment on another jurisdiction. That can be done by referring this matter to Committee, an action which I believe every member of the Council can support.

Thank you for the opportunity to share my thoughts with you.

Mike Lonergan

Leave a comment Comments → 7
  1. NineInchNachosII says:

    Yup. same old mike. voted against the symbolic stance on global climate change, and symbolic same-sex domestic partnership recognition.

    also it appears the avatar up-link is still in place..

  2. Be careful what you wish for Mike…

  3. mattersnot1 says:

    Asking the Council to do an indepth review before taking action hardly sounds like an impropriate suggestion.

  4. demeter says:

    hey council how about taking care of your own business before sticking you big bazoo’s in someone elses problem that you are a thousand miles away in miles and understanding. If you got nothing to do ive still got huge pot holes in front of my house

  5. sgraver says:

    Thanks for being a voice of reason Mike. You are right on the mark with your message.

  6. villager98 says:

    Mike Lonergan has never been in favor of any progressive idea or piece of council business. To his credit, however, he did abstain on the resolution to oppose R-71 rather than vote against it. Mike was good on business and budget issues but no friend of human rights.

  7. dogfish3440 says:

    That statement could not be any clearer. This council worries more about the Jones more than the City Of Tacoma.

We welcome comments. Please keep them civil, short and to the point. ALL CAPS, spam, obscene, profane, abusive and off topic comments will be deleted. Repeat offenders will be blocked. Thanks for taking part and abiding by these simple rules.

JavaScript is required to post comments.

Follow the comments on this post with RSS 2.0