Inside Opinion

What's on the minds of Tacoma News Tribune editorial writers

NOTICE: Inside Opinion has moved.

With the launch of our new website, we've moved Inside Opinion.
Visit the new section.

Do-it-yourselfers: Don’t try this at home

Post by Kim Bradford on May 6, 2010 at 8:48 am with 3 Comments »
May 5, 2010 9:31 pm

Today’s editorial about Pierce County’s building amnesty program described some of the safety hazards the county is finding in its search for unpermitted structures. Unfortunately, space didn’t allow us to publish photos that show those hazards. But we have them.

I emailed Chuck Kleeberg, director of Pierce County Planning and Land Services, to say essentially: Sure, we’ve all heard of the shoddy deck that killed the PLU student back in 2001, but what else have you got?

Here’s what he came up on the spot.

This photo came to me with a note that said: “See the safety concerns?” Uh, yeah. Kleeberg dubbed them traps for the tipsy.

Then there was this doozy. The inspector explained: “This deck is supported by the house roof sheathing, making it bow under the added loads. Due to the lack of proper connections, the deck roof system started to shift so the owner added cables from top of support posts to deck framing.” (You’ll have to look closely for the cables; three of them are in the lower right hand corner.)

Lastly, there was this improperly built structure that housed wood-fueled cooking vessels. You can see where they’ve singed nearby wood (they also charred the ceiling above), and what passed for ventilation.

Leave a comment Comments → 3
  1. ldozy1234 says:

    Oh my gosh… but you forgot the most dangerous items of all, all those 3,000+ sheds!!!!! I mean, wow they did “catch” 18 structures but the real story is the 3,000+ dangerous sheds that risked life and safety.
    Spin, spin spin!!

  2. YeeHaw says:

    That cooking unit is really suspiscious. Is that a RESTAURANT operation????

  3. geeterpontiac says:

    I think we are talking about exceptions rather than normality.

    Besides, I am sure there are things that are unsafe within many homes.

    Shall we put a government camera inside private homes now to monitor the interior premises? If not, why not? After all, who knows what dangerous things are happening behind closed doors?

    Or, how about a camera in the bedroom?

    You know, to ensure “safe sex”. :)

We welcome comments. Please keep them civil, short and to the point. ALL CAPS, spam, obscene, profane, abusive and off topic comments will be deleted. Repeat offenders will be blocked. Thanks for taking part and abiding by these simple rules.

JavaScript is required to post comments.

Follow the comments on this post with RSS 2.0