Inside Opinion

What's on the minds of Tacoma News Tribune editorial writers

NOTICE: Inside Opinion has moved.

With the launch of our new website, we've moved Inside Opinion.
Visit the new section.

Prop. 1 – to preserve Tacoma’s parks

Post by Patrick O'Callahan on April 10, 2010 at 6:09 pm with 3 Comments »
April 9, 2010 6:11 pm

This editorial will appear in Sunday’s print edition.

When you’ve invested a fortune in beautiful and popular parks, you don’t let them fall apart. That’s a compelling reason to vote yes for Proposition 1 on Tacoma’s April 27 ballot.

For a city its size, Tacoma has one of the most spectacular park systems in the nation.

Point Defiance alone – with its zoo, aquarium, marina, heart-stopping views and expanses of old growth forest – would be a crown jewel in any American city. Then there’s Ruston Way, with two miles of promenades, beaches, fishing, picnic spots and panoramic views on the Commencement Bay waterfront.

But the system only begins with those two gems. Metro Parks operates a total of 66 parks throughout Tacoma. Some are small, many are large; they include more than 40 soccer, football and baseball fields; four pools; more than 40 playgrounds; six community centers. They encompass 2,700 acres.

The parks host traditional league sports and community events – but also provide essential social services. A playground drop-in program serves federally subsidized free lunches to low-income children who might otherwise go hungry. After-school “clubs” offer organized activities and field trips. Hundreds of people with disabilities participate in the Special Recreation Program.

It takes serious money to maintain this much real estate and provide these services. But with inflation rising, Metro Parks’ revenues – squeezed by Initiative 747’s 1 percent cap on property taxes – have been falling relative to costs.

In recent years, the park district’s levy rate has fallen from 71 cents to 48 cents per $1,000 of a home’s value. Proposition 1 would increase Metro Parks’ taxing authority to 75 cents, equivalent to an additional $57 a year on a $220,000 home.

This would raise $5.5 million a year, not to buy anything new but to restore the district’s ability to keep the grass green, clean the restrooms, fix the pools, repair the playground equipment, etc. The alternative is a looming $5 million shortfall, which would have to be carved out of what Metro Parks has been providing the citizens of Tacoma.

We would not endorse this measure during a period of economic distress if the park district hadn’t already been aggressively squeezing its expenses. It has.

In response to its declining revenue, Metro Parks has reduced its staff and cut salaries and benefits by more than $500,000 despite the relentless inflation of medical insurance. Unlike some government agencies, it has required its employees to pay a growing share of their health care premiums – 13 percent this year, going to 14 percent next year. Two-thirds of its employees donate to the park system themselves through payroll deductions.

Proposition 1 is not about letting a fat organization stay fat. It’s about letting a leaned-out operation keep providing the superb parks and recreational programs Tacomans are accustomed to. It would be a shame if this system were allowed to slide.

Leave a comment Comments → 3
  1. Theoldsergeant says:

    Wish I could agree with you Patrick. After the raw deal the Parks gave Titlow Park, Titlow Pool and the Titlow Community, I do not trust or support them. We agreed upon a million dollar plus deal to improve the Titlow Pool. In turn the Parks people did their dance then decided to build a Pool elsewhere and take out Titlow’s pool. No Sir, I will not vote for this nor will I support the Parks Department in the future.

    Titlow Pool has been a real asset to the Community and enjoyed by all for years. Too bad local politics and bad excuses got in the way. Our loss and the Parks lose support from us down here.

  2. paulandsoon says:

    Sounds to me that the Parks Dept. owns too much property. Time to tighten the old belt, like the rest of us, and sell off some land. End of problem.

  3. I feel that we are fortunate to have as great of a parks system that we do. From what I can tell they do the best they can with what they’ve got and they’ve always been accessible when I’ve contacted them. They have my support.

We welcome comments. Please keep them civil, short and to the point. ALL CAPS, spam, obscene, profane, abusive and off topic comments will be deleted. Repeat offenders will be blocked. Thanks for taking part and abiding by these simple rules.

JavaScript is required to post comments.

Follow the comments on this post with RSS 2.0