Inside Opinion

What's on the minds of Tacoma News Tribune editorial writers

NOTICE: Inside Opinion has moved.

With the launch of our new website, we've moved Inside Opinion.
Visit the new section.

Economics make it hard to keep polls open

Post by Cheryl Tucker on Feb. 23, 2010 at 7:40 pm with 2 Comments »
February 23, 2010 5:46 pm

This editorial will appear in Wednesday’s print edition.

For the third year in a row, lawmakers from other parts of the state are trying to force Pierce County to conduct all-mail elections – like the other 38 counties already do.

Sadly, passing House Bill 1572 is probably the right thing to do. This newspaper has supported keeping an in-person option for voters, but that doesn’t look feasible anymore.

Given the cost involved with keeping polling places open – about $75,000 per election – it doesn’t make sense to spend that when the county is cutting money to law enforcement, laying off some employees and forcing others to take furloughs.

Most voters have already made the switch. Only about 10 percent of county voters cast their votes at polling places in last November’s general election, and only 3 percent in this month’s schools elections. It costs the auditor’s office about $1,500 per polling place (there were 58 in the November general election, 27 in this months’ school election).

The cost saving of all-mail voting is the reason former county auditor Jan Shabro asked the County Council last year for permission to scrap poll voting temporarily. Her request came only hours after the 2009 Legislature failed to pass the bill that would have forced the change.

County Executive Pat McCarthy later stripped $150,000 from the auditor’s budget, saying the expenditure to keep polls open could no longer be justified. Although the council refused the auditor’s request for a temporary closure, it didn’t restore the $150,000.

The council left Shabro’s successor, Julie Anderson, to figure out how to pay for poll voting without being funded for it. As she put it at the time: “I’m surprised that the County Council, which has been very supportive of poll voting, has basically de-funded poll voting,”

The auditor’s office is also facing the strong possibility of additional expenses once results of the 2010 Census come out. In 2011 the county likely will have to make election materials available in Korean and Spanish due to growth in those populations.

It’s unlikely the County Council will come up with some magical new funding source to keep the polls open – at least not one members would be able to justify to citizens already upset about cuts to the sheriff’s department. Council members might not like disappointing the few voters who still prefer to vote in person, so being forced into all-mail elections by the mean, overstepping Legislature would be more politically acceptable.

Although almost all polling places would close if HB 1572 passes, the auditor would keep a handful of voting centers open for the military, disabled people and voters who absolutely, positively must cast their ballot in person.

The House has already passed HB 1572. The Senate might as well administer the coup de grâce. And although it’s too late for this session, lawmakers should consider requiring that ballots be received by Election Day unless they’re mailed from overseas. That would allow for faster election results.

Some have argued that the earlier deadline would discourage voting. But many other states seem to be able to make the Election Day deadline work. So can Washington.

Leave a comment Comments → 2
  1. ldozy1234 says:

    This could have been easily resolved by placing the issue on the last ballot. Instead, the state will now come in and force an issue that rightfully belongs to the voters here.
    Do I think the majority of voters will vote to close the polls? Yes.
    But the right to make that decision is being taken away from the people when it would have been easily and quickly resolved by placing it on the ballot.
    State needs to back off, and Pierce County officials need to get off their duffs and make this a ballot on the upcoming election.
    To do it any other way enforces that voters are considered sheeple and can’t make any decisions on their own

  2. mattersnot1 says:

    Being old enough to remember voting with lever machines at the polls and the voting age being 21 years old or older, I find it amusing to read reports of how it cost more for poll voting than mail voting; how mail voting allows for faster election results; and how mail voting has increased the percentage of voters.
    It’s all a BIG LIE.
    They always report how much it cost for poll voting, but never tell us how much it cost for mail voting (i.e. all those extra staff hours). We used to know the outcome of elections on election night, except for very close elections.
    They tell us that mail voting has increased the number of voters. No, the number of voters has increase due to lowering the voting age to 18 and an increase in the population. It has not increased the percentage of voters. Before mail voting, the percentage was routinely over 80%. Nowadays, we’re lucky if it gets to 50%.
    Mail voting does not allow us to have FREE, EQUAL and SECURE balloting as guaranteed by our Federal and State Constitutions.
    I challenge the election department to run one election with all poll voting, then we’ll see what cost more; how fast we get election results; and what percent of the voters actually vote. Bet they won’t do it.

We welcome comments. Please keep them civil, short and to the point. ALL CAPS, spam, obscene, profane, abusive and off topic comments will be deleted. Repeat offenders will be blocked. Thanks for taking part and abiding by these simple rules.

JavaScript is required to post comments.

Follow the comments on this post with RSS 2.0