Inside Opinion

What's on the minds of Tacoma News Tribune editorial writers

NOTICE: Inside Opinion has moved.

With the launch of our new website, we've moved Inside Opinion.
Visit the new section.

The window narrows for health care reform

Post by Patrick O'Callahan on Nov. 5, 2009 at 7:55 pm with 5 Comments »
November 5, 2009 7:55 pm

This editorial will appear in Friday’s print edition.

Health care reform wasn’t on Tuesday’s ballot, but it might as well have been.

The decisive Republican victories in the New Jersey and Virginia governors races have spooked at least some congressional Democrats recently elected from red districts. That may mean that the window for action on health care reform is beginning to close – and that the window may already be too narrow for the most controversial measures to squeeze through.

Yet House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and fellow congressional leaders continue to obsess about the single most controversial provision: the “public option,” a new government-run insurance plan that would compete with private insurers.

The public option seems to have an infinite capacity to inspire arguments. Lately, the arguments have focused on abortion, with pro-life forces bent on preserving Congress’ longstanding ban on federal abortion funding, pro-choice forces bent on removing all restrictions on abortion funding, and a seemingly reasonable compromise plan under cross-fire from both camps.

This is not just an argument between Democrats and Republicans; the real fight is within the House Democratic caucus. Roughly 40 Democrats won’t support a bill that looks like it expands abortion funding. If most of them aren’t on board, Pelosi can’t get a bill through.

That’s only the House. The Senate’s got its own set of issues with the shape and details of the public option. Another complication: Independent Sen. Joe Lieberman this week announced that he would join a Republican filibuster if the health care bill didn’t meet his specifications.

In the meantime, an election year looms. The prospects for anything like comprehensive health care reform are going to fade fast once vulnerable Democratic lawmakers from conservative districts start fixating on the threat of a GOP resurgence next fall.

This would be a very good time to stop focusing on the trees and start looking at the forest. Even President Obama has called the public option a small part of the plan.

A recent review by the Congressional Budget Office bears this out: It found that roughly 2 percent of Americans under 65 might wind up covered by the public option, as proposed. The CBO concluded the plan wouldn’t run private insurers out of business, as conservatives fear; it might even cost more than private plans.

That’s good reason not to fight the public option as though it were a resurrection of Stalinism. But it’s also good reason not to risk the entire package for the sake of an insurance scheme that may make little difference in the end.

Real health care reform must include three elements: 1) making coverage available to all Americans, including those with pre-existing conditions; 2) preserving the quality of care, and 3) not breaking the bank in the bargain.

A package that gets reasonably close to all three would be far better than what this country has today. A package that offers the public option, yet sadly didn’t get through Congress, wouldn’t be any improvement at all.

Leave a comment Comments → 5
  1. jimkingjr says:

    Have you been paying attention to the details? The proposals on the table do none of the three things you outline. The House plan is up to $1.2 trillion dollars, still cuts quality of care, and those with pre-existing conditions would find themselves having to survive for six months without insurance to qualify.

  2. Justsayin says:

    Congress is starting believe the polls that show this legislation is not popular and they’re seeing how voters are communicating their frustration with their elected officials who just won’t listen. There are a lot of seats up for grabs next year.

  3. Hoodsportwriter says:

    What? You had no idea what “issues” moved the governor races in N.J. and Virginia do you?

    The Virginia Democrats on the left of center side beat the hell out of one another in the primary. The so-called Democrat who got the nomination ran FROM Obama the entire campaign and did not support his health care reform. As a Democrat and if I were living in Virginia I would not vote for him – nor for the Republican – and this my friend is what the Democrats have really got to watch out for because that is what happened in 1994 – disgusted Democrats who didn’t vote at all. And we are disgusted over the lack of leadership and the gutless behavior of the so-called “leadership” …and that includes the “moron in tennis shoes!”

    In N.J. anyone who has followed politics since last year would know Corrzine didn’t get above a 35% approval rating ever! The Republican ran hard as a moderate and didn’t bring up any of the 3 issues the Republicans run on – guns, gays and god!

    You wrote as bad an analysis as that guy who you ran from McClatchy the day after the election. And when you all get together at your conferences back east to discuss the demise of the newspaper business – do you realize what a terrible job you have all done in reporting the facts on health care reform? Jefferson would not be pleased!

  4. johnesherman says:

    Hey, don’t forget our own WA Legislative District(s) 9, 15, and 16 November 3, 2009 General Election results; in brief, the Republican Party seems to swept the Legislative Districts here also. See November 3, 2009 General Election available at
    http://vote.wa.gov/elections/wei/ under selection tab of ‘Legislative’

    Too bad the entire State Legislative Districts representative people were not put up for voter validation this last election also; similarly, just-maybe the maybe the entire State of Washington Legislative Districts might have changed hands into Republican Party or Independent Party control.

*
We welcome comments. Please keep them civil, short and to the point. ALL CAPS, spam, obscene, profane, abusive and off topic comments will be deleted. Repeat offenders will be blocked. Thanks for taking part and abiding by these simple rules.

JavaScript is required to post comments.

Follow the comments on this post with RSS 2.0