Inside Opinion

What's on the minds of Tacoma News Tribune editorial writers

NOTICE: Inside Opinion has moved.

With the launch of our new website, we've moved Inside Opinion.
Visit the new section.

Why, why did Michael Hecht stay in the cross-hairs?

Post by Patrick O'Callahan on Nov. 2, 2009 at 6:40 pm with 1 Comment »
November 2, 2009 6:44 pm

Michael Hecht could have spared himself a whole lot of grief if he’d resigned earlier. After fighting prosecution for the better part of a year, he wound up resigning anyway after his convictions last week.

He could have stepped down from the court when the allegations first came to light last January. Better yet, he could have not run for office, knowing the time bombs in his past.

Without the judge’s robes, Hecht was a common john. His offenses were so commonplace, I doubt any prosecutor would have gone to the trouble of building a case against him – if the integrity of the superior court hadn’t been at stake. As it was, the state Attorney General’s Office, no less, wound up marshaling a formidable string of witnesses for a conviction worth, at most, 90 days in jail.

Only Hecht may know why he pushed things this far.

Leave a comment Comments → 1
  1. jimkingjr says:

    Whether he may now think it was worth it or not, Hecht helped this community by getting Armijo off the bench. No one else had the guts to tackle a sitting, but incompetent, judge. Where was the News Tribune throughout Armijo’s tenure? It is sad commentary on the media and the bar that he remained on the bench as long as he did.

We welcome comments. Please keep them civil, short and to the point. ALL CAPS, spam, obscene, profane, abusive and off topic comments will be deleted. Repeat offenders will be blocked. Thanks for taking part and abiding by these simple rules.

JavaScript is required to post comments.

Follow the comments on this post with RSS 2.0