Inside Opinion

What's on the minds of Tacoma News Tribune editorial writers

NOTICE: Inside Opinion has moved.

With the launch of our new website, we've moved Inside Opinion.
Visit the new section.

A Nobel prize that rides on the future

Post by Patrick O'Callahan on Oct. 11, 2009 at 6:42 pm with 2 Comments »
October 12, 2009 8:04 pm

This editorial will appear in tomorrow’s print edition.

At this point, Barack Obama – president and now Nobel laureate – lacks only canonization as a saint.

Normally that is bestowed only after rigor mortis sets in, but if the Vatican follows the lead of the Norwegian Nobel Committee, Obama could snag at least beatification by the end of his first term.

The timing of Friday’s Nobel Peace Prize was indeed a shock. Even some of his admirers were calling it premature. There had been a lot of talk of the prize going to Chinese human rights advocate Hu Jia, who has a considerable history of courageous, effective activism in the face of a hostile dictatorship. Obama – who isn’t nine months into his presidency – has no such record.

He said as much Friday, when he expressed his own surprise at the honor and acknowledged it was not a recognition of concrete achievement.

Obama’s Nobel feels more like a publisher’s advance, like the multimillion-dollar one he’s likely to get one day on the expectation that he’ll deliver something well worth reading. Or a big loan to a promising entrepreneur.

The committee that bestows this honor leans decidedly to the left these days; its Labor/Socialist majority may hope the prize will point American foreign policy in the same direction. A sort of preemptive strike against the pursuit of American interests by military and other unpleasant means.

What the committee’s chairman said out loud, though, was that Obama was being recognized for his vision of nuclear disarmament and the “new climate in international politics” he has fostered.

You could read that as a Nobel for not being George W. Bush. “Vision” and “climate” are distinctly intangible. But – since this honor is also an honor of the United States and its global leadership – let’s give intangibles their due.

Ideals, optimism, words, attitudes, hope and other software of the human mind are the foundation of civilization’s hardware – cities, arsenals, treaties, etc. Last year’s near-collapse of the international financial system, for example, was fueled by an evaporation of confidence, another intangible not to be scoffed at.

Obama has yet to secure sanctions against Iran, let alone an end to its dangerous nuclear program. He’s yet to secure even his own government’s commitment to a serious international climate-change agreement. He has yet to do a lot of good things that he’s promised to do.

But he has – at least for the time being – enhanced the world’s opinion of the United States. In doing so, he may have enhanced the possibility that other nations will follow American leadership on initiatives important to humanity.

Intangibles create facts. If Obama’s leadership does lead to realities of genuine peace, this Nobel will be seen as thoroughly justified in retrospect.

Leave a comment Comments → 2
  1. Perhaps they should have given it to the American people, for electing him, instead?

  2. Those who criticize either President Obama or the Nobel committee betray their own ignorance and laziness by their snide comments.

    Yes, the Nobel nominations closed in early February. This should make it clear that the Nobel Peace prize was NOT given for Barak Obama’s work or achievements as president.

    His campaign and ultimate election resonated around the world as a statement of the best of America; we have shown the world that, at least for one shining moment, America can see beyond color and racial profiling on the national stage.

    The Prize was given for Obama’s (and America’s) hope, promise and vision for the future.

    The Nobel Committee, of course, has its own criteria. Consider this excerpt:

    “Obama has as President created a new climate in international politics. Multilateral diplomacy has regained a central position, with emphasis on the role that the United Nations and other international institutions can play. Dialogue and negotiations are preferred as instruments for resolving even the most difficult international conflicts. The vision of a world free from nuclear arms has powerfully stimulated disarmament and arms control negotiations. Thanks to Obama’s initiative, the USA is now playing a more constructive role in meeting the great climatic challenges the world is confronting. Democracy and human rights are to be strengthened.

    Only very rarely has a person to the same extent as Obama captured the world’s attention and given its people hope for a better future. His diplomacy is founded in the concept that those who are to lead the world must do so on the basis of values and attitudes that are shared by the majority of the world’s population.”

    Only the most shallow cynic could object to this – and of course they have.

    All of us, as Americans, should be proud that we, our nation, our voters and our president have all been recognized for our willingness to listen, to work together and share our passion for an America our Founding Fathers framed, envisioned and gave their lives for.

*
We welcome comments. Please keep them civil, short and to the point. ALL CAPS, spam, obscene, profane, abusive and off topic comments will be deleted. Repeat offenders will be blocked. Thanks for taking part and abiding by these simple rules.

JavaScript is required to post comments.

Follow the comments on this post with RSS 2.0