Inside Opinion

What's on the minds of Tacoma News Tribune editorial writers

NOTICE: Inside Opinion has moved.

With the launch of our new website, we've moved Inside Opinion.
Visit the new section.

The Secretary of State’s petition saga continues

Post by Kim Bradford on Sep. 25, 2009 at 11:28 am with 1 Comment »
October 14, 2009 5:47 pm

When we last visited the unfolding political drama over Referendum 71, it had been revealed that the Secretary of State’s position that R-71 petitions could be released unredacted was something of a recent development.

Now comes news that the fight over R-71 petitions might have spurred an enterprising political operative to try to get copies of old initiative petitions while the getting’s good. The Secretary of State has received a request from someone trying to determine the costs of obtaining petitions for several initiatives dating back to 2000. Tim Eyman has sent a letter (pdf) to the Secretary of State’s office protesting the release.

The Secretary of State’s office is currently enjoined from releasing Referendum 71 petitions due to a federal court ruling. The Ninth Circuit will hear the state’s appeal next month. If the appellate court decides that Washington’s open records law violates constitutional free speech protections, the case could dismantle public disclosure of all initiative and referendum petitions.

The person looking for all those old initiative petitions: Bryan Wahl, former lobbyist for the Washington Association of Realtors (which just came out against Eyman’s latest initiative). The Secretary of State’s office quoted Wahl a price of $1,400 for the petitions relating to 11 initiatives (some are old enough to be on microfilm, which is more expensive to provide). No word from Wahl on whether he’s planning to fork over the cash to get them.

Leave a comment Comments → 1
  1. jimkingjr says:

    Maybe Sam Reed has figured out a way to raise funds to offset further cuts to his office’s budget?

    I have never supported Tim Eyman. I have never signed one of his petitions. But if he chooses to proceed with a recall over Reed’s violation of the public trust, I will suport Eyman for the very first time.

    And thank you News Tribune for covering the truth about Reed and McKenna’s misrepresentation of our state law on this subject.

We welcome comments. Please keep them civil, short and to the point. ALL CAPS, spam, obscene, profane, abusive and off topic comments will be deleted. Repeat offenders will be blocked. Thanks for taking part and abiding by these simple rules.

JavaScript is required to post comments.

Follow the comments on this post with RSS 2.0