Inside Opinion

What's on the minds of Tacoma News Tribune editorial writers

NOTICE: Inside Opinion has moved.

With the launch of our new website, we've moved Inside Opinion.
Visit the new section.

Swine flu: An argument for paid sick days

Post by Kim Bradford on April 28, 2009 at 9:53 am |
April 28, 2009 9:53 am

Health authorities trying to stop the spread of swine flu are urging Americans to stay home if they feel sick. Businesses are encouraging their employees to do the same. But what about workers who can’t afford to miss a day’s pay? Is paid sick time merely a job perk or is it a matter of public health?


The Institute for Women’s Policy Research argues it’s the latter.


…analyses of Bureau of Labor Statistics and other data conducted by the Institute for Women’s Policy Research (IWPR) have found that less than half of workers have paid sick days, and only one in three are able to utilize sick days to care for sick children. Workers without paid sick days lose wages if they stay home, and many workers risk losing their jobs. As a result, workers who lack paid sick time are more likely to go to work with a communicable illness, and parents who cannot stay home with a sick child are more likely to send sick children to school or day care. Workers who work in direct contact with the public, such as restaurant workers, child care workers, and hotel employees, are among the least likely to have paid sick days.


People who go to work or school while sick may infect coworkers, customers, and classmates, resulting in even more infections. With seasonal influenza, this pattern of infection is a serious problem, costing employers and families millions of dollars a year and sometimes causing serious illness or death, especially among infants and the elderly.



The deaths among young, healthy individuals in Mexico (identified as a serious cause for concern by the CDC and WHO) suggest that the swine flu has the potential to be much more costly and dangerous than typical seasonal influenza.


The swine flu situation raises the question of the public health costs of failing to provide paid sick days. Despite the public health implications and popular support – four of five Americans think that paid sick days should be a basic labor standard – no national or state laws require that workers have paid sick days.



“Ensuring that all workers have access to a few paid sick days would yield far-reaching benefits to society and – especially during a pandemic – could have enormous preventive health and economic benefits. Many employers say they cannot afford to provide paid sick days, but during a time like this, society can’t afford to take risks with the public’s health,” comments IWPR Vice President and Director of Research Dr. Barbara Gault.


The Healthy Families Act, which would require that paid sick time be provided by employers with fifteen or more employees, is likely to be reintroduced in Congress sometime next month.


For more information on paid sick days, visit www.iwpr.org .

Categories:
Taking notice
*
The News Tribune now uses Facebook commenting on selected blogs. See editor's column for more details. Commenters are expected to abide by terms of service for Facebook as well as commenting rules for thenewstribune.com. Report violators to webmaster@thenewstribune.com.